![]() |
Originally Posted by elmetal
(Post 2134846)
Are we ever going to address the fact that our FAs make 1.5x on anything above 84 and we don't...?
It's $4 override over 87. Far cry from 150%, and then it is only over 87. So a FA flies 120, they'll get 32 hours times 4. $128. Big deal. |
Originally Posted by skiK2
(Post 2135250)
You are sorely mistaken, please quit with your misinformation you spew on here.
It's $4 override over 87. Far cry from 150%, and then it is only over 87. So a FA flies 120, they'll get 32 hours times 4. $128. Big deal. and we get 0. |
Whatever the mechanic / details are on it, I'd still like to understand the background.
I am sure the company didn't give it to them out of goodness of their heart. They either gave something up or had any leverage at the time. It would be delusional to expect anything given to the pilot group right now - without giving up something else. An override scheme is nothing else but another pay increase (or cost increase) for the company. Why would they do that? Just because the FAs have something like it? I don't think so. I don't see that in our future unless there is something in return that will ultimately offsets the cost increase we can offer in return. |
From my limited understanding the pay packages for the Flight Attendants have been pretty pathetic. As in no raise and here's a coat.
|
Originally Posted by elmetal
(Post 2135144)
Yeah but have you seen their opentime? Tons of stuff to pickup.
Anything above 84 is premium for them. Whether they pick it up or are awarded. Most FAs I fly with work 110-120 a month. We need that. |
Originally Posted by IFLYPLANEZBRO
(Post 2135409)
I flew with one of the guys who negotiated this last pay package. He said the company wanted to give us time and a half for all block flown over 83hrs in a month. But sapa rejected that in favor of the increased incentive pay types. Because according to him that block incentive would have been unfair to stand up crews.... Most idiotic thing I've ever heard come out of someone's mouth.
|
Originally Posted by IFLYPLANEZBRO
(Post 2135409)
I flew with one of the guys who negotiated this last pay package. He said the company wanted to give us time and a half for all block flown over 83hrs in a month. But sapa rejected that in favor of the increased incentive pay types. Because according to him that block incentive would have been unfair to stand up crews.... Most idiotic thing I've ever heard come out of someone's mouth.
|
Originally Posted by IFLYPLANEZBRO
(Post 2135409)
I flew with one of the guys who negotiated this last pay package. He said the company wanted to give us time and a half for all block flown over 83hrs in a month. But sapa rejected that in favor of the increased incentive pay types. Because according to him that block incentive would have been unfair to stand up crews.... Most idiotic thing I've ever heard come out of someone's mouth.
|
Originally Posted by IFLYPLANEZBRO
(Post 2135409)
He said the company wanted to give us time and a half for all block flown over 83hrs in a month.
We pilots are just plain dumb sometimes. Airfix |
Originally Posted by IFLYPLANEZBRO
(Post 2135409)
I flew with one of the guys who negotiated this last pay package. He said the company wanted to give us time and a half for all block flown over 83hrs in a month. But sapa rejected that in favor of the increased incentive pay types. Because according to him that block incentive would have been unfair to stand up crews.... Most idiotic thing I've ever heard come out of someone's mouth.
Originally Posted by SMACFUM
(Post 2135422)
Really?!! Was this person K.P. in ORD?
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:39 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands