![]() |
Originally Posted by elmetal
(Post 2134846)
Are we ever going to address the fact that our FAs make 1.5x on anything above 84 and we don't...?
|
Originally Posted by Utah
(Post 2135091)
They had to do that in order to get the flight attendants to work more. The pilots are already doing it whether they like it or not. They'll just hold your attendance records, that they'll share with Delta, over your head if you try to work less. And it's working.
Why do they not just assign FAs with 90 credit hours as with pilots? What is the difference there? |
Originally Posted by N1234
(Post 2135123)
Why do they not just assign FAs with 90 credit hours as with pilots? What is the difference there?
Why pay overtime when you can pay someone else straight pay? |
Originally Posted by zondaracer
(Post 2135135)
It takes three weeks to train a flight attendant with absolutely 0 experience. Unlimited supply of FAs off the street. No shortage there. Have you seen how easy it is for FAs to drop trips?
Why pay overtime when you can pay someone else straight pay? Anything above 84 is premium for them. Whether they pick it up or are awarded. Most FAs I fly with work 110-120 a month. We need that. |
Originally Posted by elmetal
(Post 2135144)
Yeah but have you seen their opentime? Tons of stuff to pickup.
Anything above 84 is premium for them. Whether they pick it up or are awarded. Most FAs I fly with work 110-120 a month. We need that. |
Originally Posted by Is offline
(Post 2135150)
You really think we are going to get that when SAPA got us a whopping 1% the last package?
|
Not even a dollar.
|
Originally Posted by Turbosina
(Post 2135015)
Yeah, seriously. Where do these unicorn trips exist?!?
|
Originally Posted by zondaracer
(Post 2135135)
It takes three weeks to train a flight attendant with absolutely 0 experience. Unlimited supply of FAs off the street. No shortage there. Have you seen how easy it is for FAs to drop trips?
Why pay overtime when you can pay someone else straight pay? Having an abundance of FA is even more of an argument not to give them anything extra. So there must be some history that would be good to understand... |
Originally Posted by elmetal
(Post 2134846)
Are we ever going to address the fact that our FAs make 1.5x on anything above 84 and we don't...?
Originally Posted by N1234
(Post 2135123)
Why do they not just assign FAs with 90 credit hours as with pilots? What is the difference there?
Originally Posted by N1234
(Post 2135180)
That's all fine and dandy. You could still assign them 90 hours at straight time... you need fewer FAs which reduces overall cost. What I am trying to understand is where there 1.5x for everything over 84 is coming from. What is the history?
Having an abundance of FA is even more of an argument not to give them anything extra. So there must be some history that would be good to understand... |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:23 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands