Notices

-800 jumpseats

Old 10-08-2019, 03:02 PM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,898
Default

Originally Posted by KnockKnock View Post
So you’re saying the gate agent should just usurp the CA’s authority and put jumpseaters on without asking? They’re asking you because it’s the chain of command and the seat belongs to the CA not because he/she assumes you drive to work and don’t want to be uncomfortable, as you so fancifully pulled out of your ***. I (we) get asked at every station throughout the system....yes....even SFO, by....you guessed it, former VX gate agents. Why on earth would you say such dumb, inflammatory, nonsense that AS pilots systematically refuse jumpseats due to the fact they live in base? You got proof to back that trash up? I used to think you had half a brain but now understand why other VXers called you out on OUR forum.
You’re yelling past me. Read again, I’m talking about the culture issue. No, at VX they never asked. They just put them on. They would give a heads up and say hey full flight you may have jumpseaters. You need CA permission to ride in the physical jumpseat. The gate agent can still list someone, and you can still deny them. The shift I saw has happened since the merger especially since 2017. I’ve never seen it as a problem when 1 JS lists. They don’t even ask me. What they always ask is are you okay with 2 jumpseaters? If they’re taking 1 without even asking the CA, it then ask if they’re okay with 2, then what conclusion can you draw other than it’s a comfort issue? I just told my story that happened last month, on my own metal a UA guy ahead goes to list for the jumpseat. The gate agent never asked any CA or told the UA guy he had to wait until permission is received. She just listed him. I was next and she directly told me she already have one JSer, so she has to ask the CA if it is okay to take 2. I said okay, but can you please list anyway? And then she did. And btw, SFO had had a lot of turnover. Don’t assume they’re all ex VX. Many quit and left after the merger. Anyway. It sounds like you took offense to the live in base and not caring comment. Because there’s no way to conclusively point to that as a direct reason, I apologize for insinuating such. Talking pre-2016, let’s be honest that when an an outsider looks in, and sees a legacy with no scope, industry bottom work rules, low voting percentages in their own election cycles, one of the very few major passenger airlines to use block representation, what other conclusion are they left to draw other than the fact that this place is “unique” and chosen because of its AK/PacNW presence, and the kind of mentality that has prevailed that goes along with that? The good news is more than half the airline is less than 10 years longevity and there is enough new blood that they are demanding change. The “old way” won’t work. To give credit where it’s due, lots of legacy AS are also on the same boat united together for improvements.
ShyGuy is offline  
Old 10-09-2019, 08:48 AM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2018
Posts: 692
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy View Post
You’re yelling past me. Read again, I’m talking about the culture issue. No, at VX they never asked. They just put them on. They would give a heads up and say hey full flight you may have jumpseaters. You need CA permission to ride in the physical jumpseat. The gate agent can still list someone, and you can still deny them. The shift I saw has happened since the merger especially since 2017. I’ve never seen it as a problem when 1 JS lists. They don’t even ask me. What they always ask is are you okay with 2 jumpseaters? If they’re taking 1 without even asking the CA, it then ask if they’re okay with 2, then what conclusion can you draw other than it’s a comfort issue? I just told my story that happened last month, on my own metal a UA guy ahead goes to list for the jumpseat. The gate agent never asked any CA or told the UA guy he had to wait until permission is received. She just listed him. I was next and she directly told me she already have one JSer, so she has to ask the CA if it is okay to take 2. I said okay, but can you please list anyway? And then she did. And btw, SFO had had a lot of turnover. Don’t assume they’re all ex VX. Many quit and left after the merger. Anyway. It sounds like you took offense to the live in base and not caring comment. Because there’s no way to conclusively point to that as a direct reason, I apologize for insinuating such. Talking pre-2016, let’s be honest that when an an outsider looks in, and sees a legacy with no scope, industry bottom work rules, low voting percentages in their own election cycles, one of the very few major passenger airlines to use block representation, what other conclusion are they left to draw other than the fact that this place is “unique” and chosen because of its AK/PacNW presence, and the kind of mentality that has prevailed that goes along with that? The good news is more than half the airline is less than 10 years longevity and there is enough new blood that they are demanding change. The “old way” won’t work. To give credit where it’s due, lots of legacy AS are also on the same boat united together for improvements.
I don’t intend to hijack this SW thread so I’ll drop it after this. Gate agents refusing to list pilots is not unique to AS and is not due to the culture surrounding the pilots operating the flight. I’ve had it happen occasionally to me at different airlines. More than a few times at AA, even after the CA said “come on down”. I actually started avoiding them because of it. I don’t blame the pilots for the actions of the gate agent.

Yes, a lot of pilots choose to come to AS because it allows them live in base. I’d say that’s a a major motivator at most airlines. Pilots gravitate towards the company that affords them the QOL boost that comes with driving to work. We can go into the pros and cons of AS or VX but that’s for another thread. Believe me when I tell you, there is no culture, practice or other shared experience causing the gate agents and certainly not the pilots to deny the use of either jump-seat. It may be the way the gate agents are being trained, it may be the gate agent is having a bad day but it most definitely is not because the CA drives to work and insists on being comfortable. I assume you were not denied the jump-seat in your scenario, in fact, you should have had priority which tells me the gate agent was inexperienced and didn’t know the listing priority.

I apologize for going low bar on you but I thought it pretty petty to paint our pilot groups as you did. The only thing to take away from this is jump-seaters are welcome in both seats on AS!
KnockKnock is offline  
Old 10-10-2019, 08:57 AM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Position: I got into this business so I wouldn't have to work.
Posts: 1,034
Default

Originally Posted by KnockKnock View Post
I don’t intend to hijack this SW thread so I’ll drop it after this. Gate agents refusing to list pilots is not unique to AS and is not due to the culture surrounding the pilots operating the flight. I’ve had it happen occasionally to me at different airlines. More than a few times at AA, even after the CA said “come on down”. I actually started avoiding them because of it. I don’t blame the pilots for the actions of the gate agent.

Yes, a lot of pilots choose to come to AS because it allows them live in base. I’d say that’s a a major motivator at most airlines. Pilots gravitate towards the company that affords them the QOL boost that comes with driving to work. We can go into the pros and cons of AS or VX but that’s for another thread. Believe me when I tell you, there is no culture, practice or other shared experience causing the gate agents and certainly not the pilots to deny the use of either jump-seat. It may be the way the gate agents are being trained, it may be the gate agent is having a bad day but it most definitely is not because the CA drives to work and insists on being comfortable. I assume you were not denied the jump-seat in your scenario, in fact, you should have had priority which tells me the gate agent was inexperienced and didn’t know the listing priority.

I apologize for going low bar on you but I thought it pretty petty to paint our pilot groups as you did. The only thing to take away from this is jump-seaters are welcome in both seats on AS!
Most commuters just want a ride to or from work. Thanks for adding some illumination for me and other commuters. Bottom line, if you meet the Capt and he/she says come on down, it should be a no-brainer. If the gate agent says, "NO!" then speak to the Capt. His/her word will trump all of the angst at the counter.
Vincent Chase is offline  
Old 10-11-2019, 08:00 AM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2019
Posts: 300
Default

Originally Posted by IceFlash View Post
You can always compare the tail number to this list
Are these the aircraft (single jumpseat) we are taking(UAL)? I believe they are all -700s. Was told it will take over a month per plane to configure for UAL specs (no printer, different radios, remove HUDs, not to mention cabin). They will also NOT get the split schimitar winglets so we have to update our manuals with regular winglet limitations (again..). We won’t see these aircraft until the end of next year at the earliest.
Vernon Demerest is offline  
Old 10-15-2019, 09:27 AM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 664
Default

Originally Posted by Vernon Demerest View Post
Are these the aircraft (single jumpseat) we are taking(UAL)? I believe they are all -700s. Was told it will take over a month per plane to configure for UAL specs (no printer, different radios, remove HUDs, not to mention cabin). They will also NOT get the split schimitar winglets so we have to update our manuals with regular winglet limitations (again..). We won’t see these aircraft until the end of next year at the earliest.
It is my understanding that all the -700s going from SWA to UAL are former AirTran birds, virtually all of which came with only one jumpseat.
Smokey23 is offline  
Old 10-15-2019, 11:12 AM
  #36  
Line holder
 
symbian simian's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: On the bus,seat 0A
Posts: 3,228
Default

Originally Posted by Smokey23 View Post
It is my understanding that all the -700s going from SWA to UAL are former AirTran birds, virtually all of which came with only one jumpseat.
Well, seeing as I JS mostly on SWA and UAL, no change for me...
symbian simian is offline  
Old 10-15-2019, 01:29 PM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: B737 Captain
Posts: 236
Default

Originally Posted by Smokey23 View Post
It is my understanding that all the -700s going from SWA to UAL are former AirTran birds, virtually all of which came with only one jumpseat.
They had 52 -700's. 30 of them had 1 JS. Those are the ones that they ordered/bought. The other 22 have 2 JS. Those were leased from GE Capital Aviation Services and International Lease Finance Corporation.
tr4a is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
candlerman
FedEx
2
03-30-2019 08:42 AM
block30
Safety
198
11-16-2015 08:19 AM
C5skippy
Major
1
03-28-2008 08:43 AM
Freight Dog
Regional
12
06-07-2006 02:01 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices