Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Southwest
Dallas Morning News SWA article? >

Dallas Morning News SWA article?

Search
Notices

Dallas Morning News SWA article?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-06-2020, 11:03 PM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,898
Default Dallas Morning News SWA article?

Anyone have access to copy/paste?

I’m curious what Gary Kelly said:


Southwest Airlines CEO Gary Kelly: ‘If things don’t improve, this just can’t continue’

A Q&A with the leader of the Dallas-based carrier, which is still expanding amid the worst financial crisis in commercial aviation history.
BY KYLE ARNOLD4:00 AMMEMBER EXCLUSIVE
ShyGuy is offline  
Old 09-07-2020, 01:40 AM
  #2  
Super Moderator
 
usmc-sgt's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,945
Default

Not SW, but this is fairly obvious and universal to the entire hospitality industry. NOTHING will survive in the whole industry if this continues. An airline can’t sell assets/furlough employees fast enough to even have a chance at a smaller size. Chapter 7/11 would be the only hope.
usmc-sgt is offline  
Old 09-07-2020, 04:22 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2018
Posts: 751
Default

it was posted in its entirety in the swapa forums or the thread below this one.
Crockrocket95 is offline  
Old 09-07-2020, 04:24 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Posts: 276
Default

Southwest Airlines CEO Gary Kelly: ‘If things don’t improve, this just can’t continue’

A Q&A with the leader of the Dallas-based carrier, which is still expanding amid the worst financial crisis in commercial aviation history.





Going into the office every day, Southwest Airlines CEO Gary Kelly describes the Dallas headquarters atmosphere as feeling a bit like the mountain hotel from the 1980s horror flick The Shining.

“We’ve got a skeleton staff here,” he said. “Our headquarters can accommodate about 5,000 people roughly and there are maybe 100 people here every day. "

Those halls and cubicles are empty for the same reason many airplanes are. The COVID-19 pandemic has changed every aspect of life for the past six months.

Kelly, who succeeded Southwest founder Herb Kelleher in 2008, spoke with The Dallas Morning News on Thursday about how the airline known for its upbeat attitude and friendly service is handling the toughest financial crisis in aviation history. His answers have been edited for brevity and clarity.

How do you see the flying experience now?

I’ve only flown Southwest and the Southwest experience has been phenomenal. Everybody has to wear a mask and we don’t book the middle seat, effectively, right now. We’ve got all of our cleaning protocols in place. The customers are very happy, The feedback that we get from the people that fly is record levels of satisfaction. The operation is running very smooth, very much on time. And it’s a pleasure to fly. You can also get a good, low fare.

We’re in the seventh month of this pandemic. How would you describe where the airline industry is today?

Oh, gosh, the effect has been catastrophic. There’s no other way to think about it. It’s truly a pandemic in the greatest sense of the word. The effect on travel and tourism and services in general, it’s just been catastrophic. I don’t think it’s shocking that we are where we are.

You go back to the spring and a lot of it was so new for the United States. People were wondering whether this was going to be more like a seasonal flu. I was reluctant to make any predictions in the spring about what would happen. I’m more of a planner rather than a prognosticator. All we could do is try to establish some boundaries for planning, especially when the federal government came through with the CARES Act. It just provided us some breathing room. We made radical adjustments and changes to the airline.

We know a lot more seven months in than we knew one week in. I believe we’re going to have to muddle through this until we get a vaccine, until we functionally reach herd immunity.

Is it frustrating to watch the pandemic drag on?

It’s frustrating if one lets himself get frustrated. We don’t have time for that. We’ve got to keep our eye on the ball. We need to run a safe airline. We need to do everything we can to make sure the business survives. We need to do the best job we can to take care of our people and our customers. And we’ve just got to persevere. We’re battle-hardened at Southwest. We are up to the challenge. I don’t see that it serves any purpose to be frustrated with things that are totally outside of your control.

You and other airline executives had predicted that travel would be down about 30% in fall. That forecast isn’t looking very good right now.

I never predicted that. What I was sharing was that was our guess. That was our plan, knowing we could adjust it if need be. It’s easier for us to cut flights than it is to add flights back. But in any event, that’s way too optimistic currently because we’re down twice that much.

What I would predict now is that I don’t see that changing significantly from here until we get a vaccine. We’ll see some lift at that point and until behaviors change. People are going to have to be confident that we’ve reached herd immunity. Until we get to that point, I wouldn’t expect us to see a significant improvement in our traffic. That will be sometime in 2021 at best.

Airlines For America’s Nicholas Calio said there may not be a full recovery until 2024. Are you looking at the possibility of an extended three- or four-year recovery?

It’s 34 years in the business for me. It was a long decade after 9/11 and it was a long slog after the Great Recession in 2008. Absolutely, we’re prepared for a long recovery here.

We were very well prepared for the pandemic coming into it with record low levels of debt. We had plenty of cash and we boosted our cash reserves dramatically this year. And we’re working on adjusting our cost structure. We’ve already got a low-cost structure in the first place and very well suited to serve the leisure side of the market in addition to the business travel market.

But I’m certainly not bullish that business travel is going to bounce right back. In fact, I would argue that relative to a normal recession and recovery scenario, this will be twice as long. I wouldn’t be surprised to see business travel languish for a decade before it gets back to 2019 levels. So yes, we’ll be prepared for that.

Southwest Airlines is launching new year-round routes later this year to Miami and Palm Springs -- the first time the Dallas-based carrier is flying direct to the popular beach and desert locations.

Southwest announced service this week to Miami and Palm Springs, Calif. Why would you fly to Miami after you’ve been so strong in Fort Lauderdale?

First of all, there are huge numbers of growth opportunities remaining for Southwest.

No. 2, we’re in an environment where our business challenge is customers. We’ve had a catastrophic reduction in customers flying — off 65% versus a year ago. And so what we need to remedy our business problem is more customers. At this point in time, there’s no way to get more depth in the market. Right now, there are only so many people that are going to fly between Dallas and Houston. I’ll call that depth.

The opportunity for us is more breadth and tap into new destinations that will give our loyal customers another opportunity to choose Southwest. We serve multiple airports in the Washington, D.C., metro area. We serve multiple airports in the Boston metro area, in the San Francisco Bay Area and the Los Angeles basin area. We believe South Florida offers the same kind of potential. Miami is obviously a very vibrant area and it’s a leisure destination. In addition to that, we’ll win a few new customers in those markets, even though we’ll be a relatively small presence.

Palm Springs is similar and different. It’s is a unique destination. You get a little seasonal contradiction there — its high season is in the winter months, which is helpful. We’re already the No. 1 airline in California in every way.

As long as we’re covering our flight costs, we’ll be contributing cash. And that’s key when we have so many assets that are being underutilized and so many employees that are also not working to their full potential. That makes the marginal cost of adding the service really, really small.

Does the cash on hand enable you to expand to places like Miami and Palm Springs?

No, because we’re not really incurring any significant capital expenditure to make this happen. I wouldn’t characterize it as no-cost expansion, but it is in relative terms. We have the airplanes already. We’ve got 100 airplanes that aren’t flying. Even with the early retirement or voluntary leave program, we still have an overstaffing situation. So we’re not fully utilizing our employees. The company has been built for capacity that is double what we’re doing.

Do you think you’ll need to continue spacing out seating when it’s not profitable to do so?

I don’t think we can do it indefinitely. I agree with that. And I think our customers understand that. What we hear from customers is they’re very comfortable with what we’re doing. Obviously, the middle seats are an element of that. Right now, we are interested in learning more about the science of physical distancing on the airplane given all of the other layers of safety and health protection that are in place. In the end, it’s all about what customers are comfortable with.

Customers are really happy with the Southwest Promise today. I’m not really prepared to say when we might change, but at some point yes, absolutely, we’re going to have to get our business back. It’s just going to have to be at the right time.



Southwest had 28% of employees take voluntary leave or early retirement. Why do you think they’re willing to do so when the global economic outlook is so uncertain?

It’s not just one thing that went into people’s decisions. It was probably a handful of things and with some people maybe more. You have a lot of people that really answered the call. They could do this personally, from their own financial perspectives, and they could help out their family members here at Southwest. They could help the company.

It was also a reflection of the generosity in terms of the offer. If you were thinking about retiring over the next several years and you had this pretty lucrative offer, for a lot of people, it’d be crazy to pass it up. I suspect that there were a lot of people who understood this is a really tough time. ‘I’m not sure exactly what kind of effort and sacrifice it’s going to take. And I might not be up for that.’ That’s fair, too, because we are going to need all hands on deck to get through this crisis. Our folks are going to have to work really, really hard.

I was pleased with that result because it certainly helps us get our costs down and we’re able to take care of our people and not force any involuntary furloughs.

What’s the possibility of avoiding furloughs in early 2021 as this pandemic continues?

If things don’t improve, this just can’t continue. We can’t lose the kind of cash we lost in the second quarter, for quarter upon quarter upon quarter. We’d be out of business. A lot depends on how the revenue environment improves. That’s front and center of why we are announcing Miami and Palm Springs because it will help chip away at that revenue deficiency.

There are still some levers we can pull. But the vaccine has to come online. It’s got to work. We’ve got to begin to get back to normal. Or else we’re just talking about a completely different catastrophic scenario for the airline industry, and other industries for that matter.

Competing airlines are taking a page out of the Southwest playbook by lowering and dropping change fees. Does that cut down on Southwest’s competitive advantage?

The differences between our airlines just shift. I will point out that they’re not moving to the Southwest position because most tickets aren’t subject to change fees, but with us, it’s all tickets. It’s somewhat hypocritical to claim that this is the right thing to do and then not do it. They have been all about fees and sticking it to customers for a long time. It’s not effective now or they wouldn’t be making a change.

This just means that now they’re going to have to match our fares. And our cost structure’s lower and our fares are lower. For them to replace this change fee revenue, they’re going to have to raise fares. It’s just going to make it more difficult for them to make a profit and still try to match Southwest fares. That’s why they did this in the first place. They needed some gimmick to strip out revenue and reduce their published fare knowing that they can get money from hidden fees. And now that advantage is being taken away.

I think it’s better for Southwest. It’s a more level playing field.

Are the next six months going to be just as damaging as the last six?

I think we’re past the dark days of March and April. Things for us have been pretty stable since July Fourth. We went into a stall when the COVID-19 cases spiked so sharply there in early July, which was a shame because we were on a pretty good trajectory and people were feeling more and more comfortable with travel.

The good news is it’s pretty stable. Stable’s good but we’re at unsustainable levels and it can’t go on indefinitely. Beyond the self-help steps taken, what is the government going to do in terms of creating CARES Act 2 and what will be in there for continuing the payroll support for the airlines? That has a major bearing on our outlook for the next six months.

Our visibility is not very far into the future. It’s pretty easy to predict that we shouldn’t expect much improvement in 2020. But I’m still hopeful about the first quarter of next year.

We’ll continue to press Congress and the administration for CARES 2. I think that would be very helpful to the country, not just the airlines, but to the whole country. We’re in a situation that, absent some kind of sovereign effort for liquidity, the country goes into depression.

No company can be prepared for an almost total loss of revenue and customers. The only way through that temporary trough is with assistance from the government.
Salukidawg is offline  
Old 09-07-2020, 07:44 AM
  #5  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Dec 2016
Posts: 98
Default

No where in that Q&A did he thank me(the US taxpayer) for making his job easier. The government can’t give, until it TAKES from someone else.

Quit paying people not to work. Spread the flying among all pilots. Reduced guarantees are still better than unemployment.

Payroll support isn’t a job program for the airlines, it’s unemployment. But instead of $1000 weekly paychecks, airlines are paying their unemployed pilots $1900/week on average.

We’re passed bridging the gap, it’s certain now, airlines aren’t recovering for years.

Do what a normal company does. If you’ve got 10 employees working 40hr weeks(400 total hours). If demand changes it to 320hrs, you can either lay off 2 employees, or keep all 10 and reduce their weekly average to 32hrs.

A normal business would NEVER pay someone to sit at home without contributing something, unless of course it wasn’t the business’s money that they were using to pay that person.
Reese is offline  
Old 09-07-2020, 07:57 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,845
Default

As long as people keep crediting 150+ every month, I won’t take less than guarantee.

If you want to spread it around more, limit OT flying to 130% of guarantee (110-115). If you can’t make ends meet on that, you’ve got issues.
flyguy81 is offline  
Old 09-07-2020, 09:23 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2016
Posts: 252
Default

Last 2 guys I flew with said they averaged 150 and 170 per month. Neither one was taking ExTO, clearly. I’d figure out how they were able to bank that much, but their boards were blocked, obviously.

As long as it’s all above board, good on them. It’s a big reason many of us chose to come here is the opportunity to work hard for more money. With the lack of POT, that’s a lot of work! I just wonder how it will be if we ever did have pilots on the streets.
Psycho18th is offline  
Old 09-07-2020, 10:17 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Mozam's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2016
Position: Left
Posts: 1,188
Default

Originally Posted by Reese View Post
No where in that Q&A did he thank me(the US taxpayer) for making his job easier. The government can’t give, until it TAKES from someone else.

Quit paying people not to work. Spread the flying among all pilots. Reduced guarantees are still better than unemployment.

Payroll support isn’t a job program for the airlines, it’s unemployment. But instead of $1000 weekly paychecks, airlines are paying their unemployed pilots $1900/week on average.

We’re passed bridging the gap, it’s certain now, airlines aren’t recovering for years.

Do what a normal company does. If you’ve got 10 employees working 40hr weeks(400 total hours). If demand changes it to 320hrs, you can either lay off 2 employees, or keep all 10 and reduce their weekly average to 32hrs.

A normal business would NEVER pay someone to sit at home without contributing something, unless of course it wasn’t the business’s money that they were using to pay that person.
I think you and I live in different Countries. Where I live no one wants to work and they are making more on unemployment than they would if they where working .
Mozam is offline  
Old 09-07-2020, 10:39 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,845
Default

Originally Posted by Psycho18th View Post
Last 2 guys I flew with said they averaged 150 and 170 per month. Neither one was taking ExTO, clearly. I’d figure out how they were able to bank that much, but their boards were blocked, obviously.

As long as it’s all above board, good on them. It’s a big reason many of us chose to come here is the opportunity to work hard for more money. With the lack of POT, that’s a lot of work! I just wonder how it will be if we ever did have pilots on the streets.
Not many days off...that’s for sure. I didn’t become a pilot to work 24 days a month. Good on them if they want to do it, but the gravy train ends when people are shown the door.
flyguy81 is offline  
Old 09-07-2020, 10:45 AM
  #10  
Furloughed Again?!
 
ZapBrannigan's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: Boeing 737
Posts: 4,796
Default

That gravy train better come to an abrupt halt if there are furloughs.

Nobody will look kindly upon pilots who gorge themselves at the trough while their brothers and sisters are on the unemployment line.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
ZapBrannigan is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Plane Ramrod
Hangar Talk
9
02-05-2016 02:30 PM
av8r4aa
Major
82
11-29-2006 08:11 PM
AlyE
Major
11
09-28-2006 11:16 AM
SWAjet
Major
2
02-26-2006 02:23 PM
SWAjet
Major
10
10-27-2005 01:01 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices