WARN letters issued to MX
#121
Line Holder
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
I'm not that easy to replace considering the standards here in the US, But anybody that requires less than 2 years of training to replace... WARN SCHMARN, you'd report to work one day only to get handed a furlough notice. I wouldn't even try to get concessions from you.
So God forgive me, I guess I'm the biggest jerk in the world.
#122
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
From: Cabin Temp Management Specialist
Kernal....Let me correct your error in union thinking. You equate public service employee unions, clerical unions, service unions etc with professional trade/skill unions/guilds. That is an apples to square pegs comparison. Police, pipe fitters, pilots, fireman, lineman, carpenters.....We bring skill, training, work ethic, integrity and overall “skin in the game”. For that we expect from our employer a fair return for our families and our futures. We bring tremendous stability and with that, consistency and an environment where our employers have the greatest likelihood of success. The other “unions “ bring none of that and I, as a lifelong and still active UBC member and a 24yr ALPA member, refuse to be associated with them.
Might I suggest you do a personal life interview. They are great for humility. You may find at the intersections of your success that your “union job” played a pivotal role. Be it a land purchase, an equipment purchase, your credit worthiness or simply paying the bills Having a W2 likely has changed the outcome. Congrats on your successful life outside of the 737....
Might I suggest you do a personal life interview. They are great for humility. You may find at the intersections of your success that your “union job” played a pivotal role. Be it a land purchase, an equipment purchase, your credit worthiness or simply paying the bills Having a W2 likely has changed the outcome. Congrats on your successful life outside of the 737....
Kernal....Let me correct your error in union thinking. You equate public service employee unions, clerical unions, service unions etc with professional trade/skill unions/guilds. That is an apples to square pegs comparison. Police, pipe fitters, pilots, fireman, lineman, carpenters.....We bring skill, training, work ethic, integrity and overall “skin in the game”. For that we expect from our employer a fair return for our families and our futures. We bring tremendous stability and with that, consistency and an environment where our employers have the greatest likelihood of success. The other “unions “ bring none of that and I, as a lifelong and still active UBC member and a 24yr ALPA member, refuse to be associated with them.
Might I suggest you do a personal life interview. They are great for humility. You may find at the intersections of your success that your “union job” played a pivotal role. Be it a land purchase, an equipment purchase, your credit worthiness or simply paying the bills Having a W2 likely has changed the outcome. Congrats on your successful life outside of the 737....
Might I suggest you do a personal life interview. They are great for humility. You may find at the intersections of your success that your “union job” played a pivotal role. Be it a land purchase, an equipment purchase, your credit worthiness or simply paying the bills Having a W2 likely has changed the outcome. Congrats on your successful life outside of the 737....
I also find it interesting that you segregate police and firefighters out from all other public-sector employees. Why is that? Does someone need to put themselves in harm's way in order to qualify for the benefits of unionism?
The true benefits of unionism extend beyond mere job protection and collective bargaining. Unionism in and of itself creates classes of stable jobs which allow a middle class to exist. It's become all the rage to throw stones at public sector employees who still enjoy some semblance of the kinds of benefits which far more Americans used to. Forty years ago, a third of US employees belonged to unions. Today, six percent of do. The decline in unionized jobs tracks closely with the downward spiral of the American middle class. We are now flirting with levels of income inequality and wealth concentration which haven't existed in this country since the age of Getty and Rockefeller.
So rather than bash on the few folks who still have it relatively good, wouldn't it be more productive to ask why so many Americans have it so much worse than their parents and grandparents ever did?
#123
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 291
Likes: 0
What’s keeping her from going to work in a charter or private school? Would she make more money with better benefits? (Legitimately asking).
On another note. Personally, this year has made me want to completely do away with public education and go toward a system like Sweden. In Sweden, the kids parents get a check and they take it to any school they want to get their kid the best education they can. The teachers that can’t teach or teach their politics should get fired. And when the government decides that schools should be shut down the parents should be able to send their kids to private or charter schools like Gavin Newsom did. (School choice)
Also, pensions are dumb. (The point I think the guy was making.) They’re a scheme that doesn’t work accept when backed by the government/ you and me. I met many retired auto workers driving truck to make ends meat because their pensions went away when the company went away. Fully vested 401K all the way. I doubt most people have a problem with certain union protections.
On another note. Personally, this year has made me want to completely do away with public education and go toward a system like Sweden. In Sweden, the kids parents get a check and they take it to any school they want to get their kid the best education they can. The teachers that can’t teach or teach their politics should get fired. And when the government decides that schools should be shut down the parents should be able to send their kids to private or charter schools like Gavin Newsom did. (School choice)
Also, pensions are dumb. (The point I think the guy was making.) They’re a scheme that doesn’t work accept when backed by the government/ you and me. I met many retired auto workers driving truck to make ends meat because their pensions went away when the company went away. Fully vested 401K all the way. I doubt most people have a problem with certain union protections.
Last edited by usernamehere; 11-30-2020 at 08:37 AM.
#124
Line Holder
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 641
Likes: 125
From: 737CA
Also, pensions are dumb. (The point I think the guy was making.) They’re a scheme that doesn’t work accept when backed by the government/ you and me. I met many retired auto workers driving truck to make ends meat because their pensions went away when the company went away. Fully vested 401K all the way. I doubt most people have a problem with certain union protections.
Their are still many private companies that have pensions. UPS, Prudential,J&J, Coca Cola. All are profitable and all are not the on the dime of the taxpayers. About 13 million Americans get a private pension check. 401k's were set up to put the burden of retirement to the employees and not the employers. YOU have to put your earned money to get a match from the employer 99% of the time. Throw in the fact that employees pay more of for healthcare than their employers and you can see why Americans have hardly any retirement savings and 400 bucks away from a catastrophe. Greatest labor theft in the last 50 years IMO.
#125
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
From: Cabin Temp Management Specialist
Their are still many private companies that have pensions. UPS, Prudential,J&J, Coca Cola. All are profitable and all are not the on the dime of the taxpayers. About 13 million Americans get a private pension check. 401k's were set up to put the burden of retirement to the employees and not the employers. YOU have to put your earned money to get a match from the employer 99% of the time. Throw in the fact that employees pay more of for healthcare than their employers and you can see why Americans have hardly any retirement savings and 400 bucks away from a catastrophe. Greatest labor theft in the last 50 years IMO.
#126
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 1,264
Likes: 0
I disagree with this assertion that public employees are somehow undeserving of the benefits of unionism because they perform tasks which, in your mind, don't rise to the level of skilled labor. My wife has been a public school educator for seventeen years. To watch her take charge of a roomful of kids and get them to learn and to listen, all while navigating the labyrinthine requirements of high-stakes standardized testing, is something which has to be seen to be believed. I often think that, of the two of us, hers is the far more demanding job. She brings skill and integrity to the job every single day and she does it without the benefit of a union. As a reward for her talent and dedication, she's seen her wages stagnate and her benefits whittled away to the point that if I were to lose my job and we had to put the family on her insurance, our monthly premium would be $1,200 for a plan which would continue to gouge us every time we had an interaction with a medical professional.
I also find it interesting that you segregate police and firefighters out from all other public-sector employees. Why is that? Does someone need to put themselves in harm's way in order to qualify for the benefits of unionism?
The true benefits of unionism extend beyond mere job protection and collective bargaining. Unionism in and of itself creates classes of stable jobs which allow a middle class to exist. It's become all the rage to throw stones at public sector employees who still enjoy some semblance of the kinds of benefits which far more Americans used to. Forty years ago, a third of US employees belonged to unions. Today, six percent of do. The decline in unionized jobs tracks closely with the downward spiral of the American middle class. We are now flirting with levels of income inequality and wealth concentration which haven't existed in this country since the age of Getty and Rockefeller.
So rather than bash on the few folks who still have it relatively good, wouldn't it be more productive to ask why so many Americans have it so much worse than their parents and grandparents ever did?
I also find it interesting that you segregate police and firefighters out from all other public-sector employees. Why is that? Does someone need to put themselves in harm's way in order to qualify for the benefits of unionism?
The true benefits of unionism extend beyond mere job protection and collective bargaining. Unionism in and of itself creates classes of stable jobs which allow a middle class to exist. It's become all the rage to throw stones at public sector employees who still enjoy some semblance of the kinds of benefits which far more Americans used to. Forty years ago, a third of US employees belonged to unions. Today, six percent of do. The decline in unionized jobs tracks closely with the downward spiral of the American middle class. We are now flirting with levels of income inequality and wealth concentration which haven't existed in this country since the age of Getty and Rockefeller.
So rather than bash on the few folks who still have it relatively good, wouldn't it be more productive to ask why so many Americans have it so much worse than their parents and grandparents ever did?
#128
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2019
Posts: 791
Likes: 0
Lebowski, your wife is a rare gem. She deserves far more than she gets but she is dragging the dead weight of the NEA around with her. She is not allowed to rise up. She clearly has integrity and a strong work ethic to produce those results. Likely a strong, moral character but she is one of too few in a field of too many....
#130
Coal miners are union.
Remember unions originated to protect workers from dangerous working conditions. Collective bargaining was a perk. Typically skilled labor doesn’t need to be unionized. (Doctors for example)
Remember unions originated to protect workers from dangerous working conditions. Collective bargaining was a perk. Typically skilled labor doesn’t need to be unionized. (Doctors for example)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



