Wait, what?
#71
.
#73
Line Holder
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
It’s really a risk calculus, how low you can go on experience. But making proper risk assessments—or assessments based on anything other than the short term bottom line—has never been management’s strong suit anyways.
#74
Line Holder
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 843
Likes: 24
#75
These people need to know where they stand with the company.
Why would SWA retain FordHarrison (proper spelling) if they cared about the employees?
FH is the number one union-busting law firm representing most negotiations with most labor groups with most airlines. They even advise the airlines on healthcare, FMLA and the covid vax situation, turning what should be simple, humane programs into leverage over labor.
Don’t believe SWA is on board? They were the presenters at the 2017 Airline Labor Relations (read, union busting) symposium in TX.
https://www.fordharrison.com/webfile...0Agenda(1).pdf
Last edited by Grumpyaviator; 02-04-2023 at 05:45 AM.
#76
#77
Line Holder
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 641
Likes: 124
From: 737CA
In practice, it is severely lacking in my own experience but especially as evidenced by the stories I've heard about our pilots or their family members dealing with serious medical situations and then also having to deal with the stress of rejected claims and the bureaucracy of trying to get them processed correctly.
And then on the NEC, we are industry-lagging on the company contribution rate and severely lagging in our career retirement fund accumulation. Given our career-average hourly/TFP rates compared to the typical lifetime progression at our peer Big Three airlines, FedEx, and UPS, we would need a dramatically better NEC contribution than them to pull even in terms of end-of-career retirement fund amounts with them. I'm not a tax expert, so even dramatically better rates may not be able to do it once IRS limitations are taken into account (not sure).
Since 2008 the largest nine airlines now are the largest four in market share. That brings stability to the industry. Excess cash flows over the last decade have given airlines the ability to pay down billions in debt. Pay dividends, stock buy backs, etc. Pensions as a percentage of the total long term liabilities are much smaller than it was pre 9/11. And its getting smaller as retired guys pass away. Single digit operating margins have given away to the mid teens. That's pretty damn good for a capital intensive industry. Look at the melt down. Net loss was only 200 million for the quarter. WE still made 723 million for the year. 2019 we made 2.3 billion. When the company is firing on all cylinders, this place mints money. It paid off three billion in debt in 2022. Like I said I leave it to the EF&A guys to crunch the numbers but it seems to me affordable.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



