Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Southwest
Union hints of acquisition >

Union hints of acquisition

Search

Notices

Union hints of acquisition

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-16-2025 | 04:55 AM
  #541  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 556
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by chucknorris
You also get nearly 4 billion in cash.
Not only the $4B Cash, but all the real estate/slots, BOS, JFK/T5&T6, FLL, MCO (new terminal), Caribbean SJU, Europe Slots in LHR, CDG, AMS, MAD, etc. etc.

In my opinion, the real question for WN and B6 is; do they want to change their business model to compete with DL/UA/AA??

Do they want to go after Premium Customers, Lounges, First Class, which all leads to big Credit Card and Loyalty $$$, One World or some other alliance.

OR do they want stick with LCC/Niche model. If the answer is to change their business model to compete with Big 3, then IMO it’s good for both WN/B6.

But, just a humble opinion.
Reply
Old 02-16-2025 | 06:09 AM
  #542  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 767
Likes: 221
Default

I suppose it would have been a done deal if we didn’t have the leadership challenges. Now, we have a board that wants to get the house cleaning complete before we take on something that we’re, sadly, incapable of executing. We’ll be prepared for it after the ideal season has passed for m&a. You know, kinda like we’re doing with the “premium” services. Too little, too late. I think we needed a shakeup years ago and we might have been prepared for this moment.
Reply
Old 02-16-2025 | 06:38 AM
  #543  
WHACKMASTER's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 7,578
Likes: 288
From: DOWNGRADE COMPLETE: Thanks Gary. Thanks SWAPA.
Default

Originally Posted by Liberty
I suppose it would have been a done deal if we didn’t have the leadership challenges. Now, we have a board that wants to get the house cleaning complete before we take on something that we’re, sadly, incapable of executing. We’ll be prepared for it after the ideal season has passed for m&a. You know, kinda like we’re doing with the “premium” services. Too little, too late. I think we needed a shakeup years ago and we might have been prepared for this moment.
Exactly. Not to mention the new SWA “premium service “ is going to be an utter joke. Let’s get some new seats (that are probably just as thin and uncomfortable), reduce pitch in 2/3rds of the plane to increase pitch in the front 1/3rd, keep the same 3+3 abreast, and not offer any additional food items.

SWA premium seating! The clown show continues.
Reply
Old 02-16-2025 | 07:09 AM
  #544  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 282
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by WHACKMASTER
Exactly. Not to mention the new SWA “premium service “ is going to be an utter joke. Let’s get some new seats (that are probably just as thin and uncomfortable), reduce pitch in 2/3rds of the plane to increase pitch in the front 1/3rd, keep the same 3+3 abreast, and not offer any additional food items.

SWA premium seating! The clown show continues.

Just wait and see Emirates will envious of our cabins !!!! We are going to take on the world with this premium seating and excellent service from our FA’s.
Reply
Old 02-16-2025 | 07:33 AM
  #545  
Gets Weekend Reserve
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,277
Likes: 274
From: B737CA
Default

Originally Posted by Zman81
Just wait and see Emirates will envious of our cabins !!!! We are going to take on the world with this premium seating and excellent service from our FA’s.
Reply
Old 02-16-2025 | 10:29 AM
  #546  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 767
Likes: 221
Default

Originally Posted by RJSAviator76
How is it that every pilot knows our FAs are next-level harassers of the traveling public but it isn’t showing up in customer survey numbers? This doesn’t make sense to me and I’m choosing to disbelieve the company on this. The same way that I chose to disbelieve them when they said customer surveys show a preference for open seating which I knew couldn’t be true…as soon as Elliott showed up, we found out the truth.
Reply
Old 02-16-2025 | 11:07 AM
  #547  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Aug 2021
Posts: 37
Likes: 3
Default JetBlue

JetBlue currently has about 12 airframes parked with the Pratt & Whitney PW1100G-JM engines.
The latest turn around time for these engines is currently 1 year. JetBlue said next year they will have high teen number of aircraft parked for the engine issue.
IMO, I doubt Southwest would want to merge with them with the engine problems on the A321 and A220.
Reply
Old 02-16-2025 | 12:26 PM
  #548  
Flyby1206's Avatar
SDQ Base Chief
20 Years
On Reserve
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,089
Likes: 48
From: 320 CA
Default

Originally Posted by Plane driver
JetBlue currently has about 12 airframes parked with the Pratt & Whitney PW1100G-JM engines.
The latest turn around time for these engines is currently 1 year. JetBlue said next year they will have high teen number of aircraft parked for the engine issue.
IMO, I doubt Southwest would want to merge with them with the engine problems on the A321 and A220.
…737MAX enters the chat…
Reply
Old 02-16-2025 | 12:33 PM
  #549  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 556
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by Plane driver
JetBlue currently has about 12 airframes parked with the Pratt & Whitney PW1100G-JM engines.
The latest turn around time for these engines is currently 1 year. JetBlue said next year they will have high teen number of aircraft parked for the engine issue.
IMO, I doubt Southwest would want to merge with them with the engine problems on the A321 and A220.
Just to clarify; between now and next year JetBlue has up to the high teens (total in that given period) affected by P&W. 2026 is the projected get well/healthy year, and then they also have deferred deliveries available. Basically no growth mode for a couple years except for increased ASMs due to retirement of E190 and delivery of A220s.

To sum that up for a WN/B6 scenario - B6 would be healthy (engine wise) by the time any Merger or single operating certificate were to be finalized (hypothetically).

Just sayin, back to my forum now, sorry to interrupt.
Reply
Old 02-17-2025 | 06:07 AM
  #550  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 1,866
Likes: 0
From: Left
Default

Well, it's about time! I say buy BOTH JB and Breeze (make Dave Neeleman really happy!) and double down on the A220 for future fleet growth - including forcing Airbus to finally build the proposed stretched A220 (the A220-500). The economics on the proposed A220-500 would be unmatched in that seat category - better ASM than both the A320 NEO and the 737 MAX 7 & 8. The merged airline should be the launch customer for the stretched version. It sounds like Airbus has been working hard to improve the supply chain issues associated with the A220.

Buying both JB and Breeze will immediately reduce fleet risk related to Boeing and it would provide more gate access to critical business centers like JFK & BOS. I assume the SWA board wants to add more high-margin business travelers to the SWA passenger mix, and JB would provide access to more business-focused markets. Buying Breeze would take out a low-cost competitor and provide immediate access to a desirable fleet type that SWA already knows well after it's evaluation of the A220. And logically, future combined fleet should focus on scaling the A220 (300/500), A321 NEO and B737 MAX (if certified & available) fleets over time.

So, those are my initial thoughts - fingers crossed that we see some strategic moves like this soon! And your lower backs will thank me once you move out of the B737 with those awful cockpit seats!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Laughing_Jakal
=> United Contract 2022
132
10-12-2022 05:20 PM
Spoilers Deploy
United
34
10-11-2022 11:29 PM
White Cap
Cargo
49
09-26-2019 06:11 PM
jetstar1
FedEx
33
08-31-2015 04:24 PM
Fegelein
Cargo
22
05-04-2015 01:03 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices