Search

Notices

Another incident ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-01-2024 | 06:08 AM
  #31  
UGBSM's Avatar
FlySmarterNotHarder
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 596
Likes: 1
From: fifi flyer
Default

Originally Posted by Beech Dude
I agree. But any pilot worth their salt knows that CTAF and UNICOM are not one in the same. If they don't, they shouldn't have a commercial ticket, let alone an ATP.
Pilots use a CTAF to communicate with each other and coordinate their movements. UNICOM, on the other hand, is more like a customer service desk at the airport. CTAF is usually the tower frequency, and UNICOM exists specifically to keep that sort of traffic off the tower frequency.
Reply
Old 07-01-2024 | 07:09 AM
  #32  
Margaritaville's Avatar
It's 5 o'clock somewhere
 
Joined: Oct 2020
Posts: 2,671
Likes: 17
Default

Originally Posted by UGBSM
Pilots use a CTAF to communicate with each other and coordinate their movements. UNICOM, on the other hand, is more like a customer service desk at the airport. CTAF is usually the tower frequency, and UNICOM exists specifically to keep that sort of traffic off the tower frequency.
Exactly. UNICOM at large airports is usally monitored by the FBO(s) and is used to arrange fuel and parking and passenger pickups etc. This is not the same as CTAF and every professional pilot should know this.
Reply
Old 07-01-2024 | 08:26 AM
  #33  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,164
Likes: 803
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by joepilot50
Making calls over CTAF are not a requirement at least FAR's.

I am not sure if SWA procedures dictate crews shall monitor and broadcast over CTAF at uncontrolled/tower closed fields.
You can still get violated for not complying with the AIM and maybe even AC's if said non-compliance creates a problem (such as an accident).

If the FAA promulgated the info, and you didn't read and heed, that can be grounds for 91.13.
Reply
Old 07-01-2024 | 10:00 AM
  #34  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2022
Posts: 591
Likes: 176
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
You can still get violated for not complying with the AIM and maybe even AC's if said non-compliance creates a problem (such as an accident).

If the FAA promulgated the info, and you didn't read and heed, that can be grounds for 91.13.
Simply calling out the said statement of, " required CTAF calls"

You don't have to make them, but you certainly will probably have to defend that decision if anything happens.
Reply
Old 07-01-2024 | 01:36 PM
  #35  
galaxy flyer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 5,244
Likes: 2
From: Baja Vermont
Default

Originally Posted by UGBSM
Pilots use a CTAF to communicate with each other and coordinate their movements. UNICOM, on the other hand, is more like a customer service desk at the airport. CTAF is usually the tower frequency, and UNICOM exists specifically to keep that sort of traffic off the tower frequency.
Sort of, true uncontrolled airports often use Unicom as the CTAF frequency.
Reply
Old 07-01-2024 | 04:00 PM
  #36  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 250
Likes: 10
Default

Originally Posted by galaxy flyer
Sort of, true uncontrolled airports often use Unicom as the CTAF frequency.
Correct. They may not have a "FAA" freq assigned to them, such as 122.80 etc. I came from the 135 world of little airports and some fields use UNICOM as that is also the freq for their light system, etc. For those old enough, remember the FSS each state had? They had a freq as well and would "coordinate" traffic etc, albeit "advisory" only.

This is PPL 101. All of the airports we serve the jeep app plate will have a CTAF above whatever freq that airport uses and a ball note for the lighting if different then CTAF.
Reply
Old 07-01-2024 | 06:51 PM
  #37  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 767
Likes: 221
Default

This forum turned into a junior Civil Air Patrol chat group.
Reply
Old 07-01-2024 | 07:20 PM
  #38  
TiredSoul's Avatar
All is fine at .79
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 4,490
Likes: 43
From: Paahlot
Default

Originally Posted by Liberty
This forum turned into a junior Civil Air Patrol chat group.
They probably would have done better then this SW crew.

*mic drop*
Reply
Old 07-01-2024 | 07:20 PM
  #39  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 250
Likes: 10
Default

Originally Posted by Liberty
This forum turned into a junior Civil Air Patrol chat group.
Few things seem worse. I'm outa here.
Reply
Old 07-01-2024 | 07:32 PM
  #40  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 767
Likes: 221
Default

Originally Posted by TiredSoul
They probably would have done better then this SW crew.

*mic drop*
☝️ See what I mean….
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Propwash72
Career Questions
4
10-06-2019 03:42 AM
pem0055
Career Questions
6
03-14-2017 08:32 PM
uboatdriver
Career Questions
3
07-03-2013 03:41 PM
Flameout
Major
64
09-17-2008 02:40 PM
2cylinderdriver
Regional
28
09-17-2006 04:13 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices