Search

Notices

Difficult Decisions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-30-2024 | 03:55 AM
  #151  
hoover's Avatar
At your mom's house
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,719
Likes: 486
From: cpt 737
Default

Originally Posted by at6d
We have Coke Zero? Huh, learned something new.
they hide it with the ginger ale
Reply
Old 09-30-2024 | 08:55 AM
  #152  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 258
Likes: 6
From: 75/76 CA
Default

Originally Posted by e6bpilot
I don't think our illustrious COB is looking to do anything evil, he is just looking out for number one and the legacy that he built after the founder left. Had he bailed in 2019, he would have been hailed a hero and we probably would have had Tom Nealon as our CEO. Instead, that succession plan fell apart and he slashed and burned during Covid, delaying our recovery, then Boeing happened, the meltdown happened, and we all know the rest. Gary Kelly did some remarkable things in terms of growing the company, but he left a legacy of paying investors when we should have been getting the plumbing and electrical upgraded resulting in the biggest meltdown in the industry's history. Now he wants to get his and leave as much of his team that he has in place intact. I don't blame him, I am not mad at him, he just kind of sucks and I don't trust him to do anything more. It isn't personal. Good luck to him and his exotic car collection. Go enjoy the grandkids while there is still time. Adios. Time to leave...like why are you still here?

Smart people have peeked under the hood and seen what SWA has going on. It isn't pretty. We got here by thinking we were smarter than everyone else when really we were mostly just lucky. I would agree with your assessment about the corporate raiders and free cash except they just announced stock buybacks which will require a boatload of free cash that they currently don't have. So instead of generating the free cash first and then being like "man, we are out of stuff to spend money on, let's buy our own stock", they are saying "let's sell some airplanes and leverage our order book to generate free cash to buy back stock". That isn't the way it's supposed to work. It's a clear signal to institutional investors that we are willing to buy our way out of this problem.

The funny thing about this whole situation is that neither Elliott nor the company has the final say in what happens. It's just the way the financial markets work right now. Both are sending up big signals to try and get other people to change their minds. That's it. Its a multi billion dollar game where someone behind the curtain picks the winner which definitely won't be any of us.
probably this... I'm not at SWA, and I'm on airline #5. I always tried to sharp shoot the system. It isn't possible. If you like the flying and drive to work, think twice before uprooting your whole life. and remember... free advice is worth what you pay for it..

did you see this? thoughts?

https://youtu.be/wjqE3d0tJZA?si=pGtJNAC68xGJgzoa
Reply
Old 09-30-2024 | 05:31 PM
  #153  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 767
Likes: 221
Default

Is there no way to get rid of Monkey Pox over here? This ATL FA is insufferable! He’s overshooting his goal of being the most noxious presence on the forum…
Reply
Old 09-30-2024 | 06:41 PM
  #154  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2023
Posts: 534
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Liberty
Is there no way to get rid of Monkey Pox over here? This ATL FA is insufferable! He’s overshooting his goal of being the most noxious presence on the forum…
So you have Monkey Pox?
Reply
Old 09-30-2024 | 06:45 PM
  #155  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2023
Posts: 534
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Zard
Coke zero. Two coffee cups of ice. Thanks.

How's the ATL FA group taking the news?
You must be a Air Tran guy who thinks he got hosed when SWA bought it outright? Now that was the worse decision Gary Kelly ever made IMO. He should have just waited for it to go belly up and bought it's pieces and had all you guys all interview. 3/4 of would not have gotten hired.
Reply
Old 10-01-2024 | 12:58 PM
  #156  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2022
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Default

I fear this Elliot group not interested in running an airline and only interested in taking money out of the airline. That's there track history.
Reply
Old 10-01-2024 | 01:30 PM
  #157  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,167
Likes: 803
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by Buchanan10
I fear this Elliot group not interested in running an airline and only interested in taking money out of the airline. That's there track history.
Could be. But that's a dangerous game to play in the era of "too big to fail" airlines.
Reply
Old 10-01-2024 | 01:37 PM
  #158  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2022
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
Could be. But that's a dangerous game to play in the era of "too big to fail" airlines.
I think a lot of people thought the same thing with Eastern, Braniff, and TWA. And if Wikipedia is right Elliot had a hand in their restructuring did it not? If you look at Elliots past statement with other companies, they are running the same game plan here at SWA as other companies they tried to muscle in. I think everyone should be suspicious of this group.
Reply
Old 10-01-2024 | 04:59 PM
  #159  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,167
Likes: 803
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by Buchanan10
I think a lot of people thought the same thing with Eastern, Braniff, and TWA. And if Wikipedia is right Elliot had a hand in their restructuring did it not? If you look at Elliots past statement with other companies, they are running the same game plan here at SWA as other companies they tried to muscle in. I think everyone should be suspicious of this group.
My point was that a corporate raider's flexibility might get inhibited by .gov if it was looking to significantly screw up air travel capacity. They might get stuck with a white elephant, and no way to squeeze blood from the stone.

Your examples are post-deregulation fallout. I think the last of that was settled with the big BK's and mergers 15-20 years ago, and the rise of the ULCC's.

We're in a new era now. Don't forget the past, but there are differences.
Reply
Old 10-01-2024 | 06:06 PM
  #160  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2022
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
My point was that a corporate raider's flexibility might get inhibited by .gov if it was looking to significantly screw up air travel capacity. They might get stuck with a white elephant, and no way to squeeze blood from the stone.

Your examples are post-deregulation fallout. I think the last of that was settled with the big BK's and mergers 15-20 years ago, and the rise of the ULCC's.

We're in a new era now. Don't forget the past, but there are differences.
Well I don't trust Elliot. When the letters putting companies on notice only differentiate by the dates and the names at the top, I find that awful telling. To me that says they have a game plan to rake in as much money as they can no matter the cost to the companies or its employees.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RockChalk
Technical
35
10-13-2011 01:36 PM
tangoindia
Hangar Talk
10
04-14-2009 07:53 PM
jester
Regional
23
08-09-2007 08:58 PM
kaptendiddy
ExpressJet
11
07-13-2007 07:28 PM
Prospect Pilot
Regional
8
03-17-2007 10:31 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices