Search

Notices

Difficult Decisions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-03-2024 | 02:50 PM
  #191  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 4,590
Likes: 434
Default

Originally Posted by Buchanan10
Yeah, well there is old saying, Don't Pee down back and tell me it's raining either, and in my opinion thats what you're going to get, and have already gotten with many of Elliots statements. So far SWA has not ever furloughed a single employee not once and as bad as you might think things are here, there still not that bad. Now do we need to change some things, well every company needs to change to survive and SWA is no different, and we are seeing that change right now. Just because Elliot or SWAPA disagrees with it, well to bad. SWAPA needs to stick with CBA and pilot issues.

Just about every airline out there is cutting capacity and see headwinds for the future.

Delta CEO sounds alarm about a growing problem (yahoo.com)
I understand the scenario. I didn't say I was for Elliott's plan at all, I just said I am pro regime change. Elliott so far has been long on criticism and short on plans. What even is their plan? I don't know if anyone is sure.

I listened the the Muñoz podcast today and I agree with him on every point except retaining Bob Jordan. As he stated so well, Elliott is "here for a good time, not a long time." They have no interest in the day to day running of this company other than how it attains their goals to cash out and leave.

Jordan is, I assume in an attempt to pay off a bloc of potential proxy voters, straight up bribing them with buybacks based on a scheme to become an aircraft sales and leasing organization. Great, way to finally leverage those assets, but it doesn't do anything but temporarily improve the bottom line. That temporary improvement has already been spoken for in the form of effing stock buybacks, which are quite frankly the worst possible way for a company to use its free cash.

I would like to remind everybody who got us into this mess: Gary Kelly and Bob Jordan and their stable of Kelly hand picked lieutenants. This airline needs an outside influence in a bad way. I am pro company all the way. I want Southwest to succeed and rule the world, but the current regime had their chance along with all the tools to do it. Time for someone else's turn.

To your point on furloughing employees - with all due respect, SWA attempted to furlough and SWAPA went to bat and saved pilot jobs in the "save our Johnson" campaign. Fast forward and during the dark days of Covid they chose to send warn letters over Christmas and would have certainly furloughed 1221 pilots had they not gotten a tranche of psp money from uncle sugar. So save me the pro company spiel. They aren't someone to be admired.
Reply
Old 10-03-2024 | 03:00 PM
  #192  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 4,590
Likes: 434
Default

Now Gangwahl, recently appointed to the SWA BOD, has bought a large chunk of stock. Not only does this give him outsized influence on the board and as a potential proxy voter, but he is essentially hitching his wagon to Jordan's plan of buybacks in order to boost the share price and reward himself.

As Zard said to me earlier, "is Elliott getting outmaneuvered by objectively the dumbest effing corporate board that exists today?!"

The plot certainly thickens. I think this will either end in a negotiated peace or a very close and nasty proxy battle. In any case, we are living in interesting times.

If Jordan and Kelly (they are one and the same essentially) succeed, they will have blown $2B and untold amounts of customer goodwill in an epic meltdown as well as now authorized $2.5B in buybacks to bribe the stakeholders of an activist campaign that they ushered in. Not only that, but they are short on cash to cover it, so they are leveraging hard assets to make it happen. It's going to take a lot of single engine taxi and cost index 5 to make up for that.
Reply
Old 10-03-2024 | 05:14 PM
  #193  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2022
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by e6bpilot
I understand the scenario. I didn't say I was for Elliott's plan at all, I just said I am pro regime change. Elliott so far has been long on criticism and short on plans. What even is their plan? I don't know if anyone is sure.

I listened the the Muñoz podcast today and I agree with him on every point except retaining Bob Jordan. As he stated so well, Elliott is "here for a good time, not a long time." They have no interest in the day to day running of this company other than how it attains their goals to cash out and leave.

Jordan is, I assume in an attempt to pay off a bloc of potential proxy voters, straight up bribing them with buybacks based on a scheme to become an aircraft sales and leasing organization. Great, way to finally leverage those assets, but it doesn't do anything but temporarily improve the bottom line. That temporary improvement has already been spoken for in the form of effing stock buybacks, which are quite frankly the worst possible way for a company to use its free cash.

I would like to remind everybody who got us into this mess: Gary Kelly and Bob Jordan and their stable of Kelly hand picked lieutenants. This airline needs an outside influence in a bad way. I am pro company all the way. I want Southwest to succeed and rule the world, but the current regime had their chance along with all the tools to do it. Time for someone else's turn.

To your point on furloughing employees - with all due respect, SWA attempted to furlough and SWAPA went to bat and saved pilot jobs in the "save our Johnson" campaign. Fast forward and during the dark days of Covid they chose to send warn letters over Christmas and would have certainly furloughed 1221 pilots had they not gotten a tranche of psp money from uncle sugar. So save me the pro company spiel. They aren't someone to be admired.
But did they furlough? No, has every other airline in this country furloughed? Yes, has every other airline filed bankruptcy at least once to get rid of lot of their debt to be able to compete with us? Yes, You may not like those facts, but they are large and speak volumes about SWA. Do changes need to happen? Sure they do. Are they making those changes, sure seems like it.
Reply
Old 10-03-2024 | 05:23 PM
  #194  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 767
Likes: 221
Default

Originally Posted by Buchanan10
But did they furlough? No, has every other airline in this country furloughed? Yes, has every other airline filed bankruptcy at least once to get rid of lot of their debt to be able to compete with us? Yes, You may not like those facts, but they are large and speak volumes about SWA. Do changes need to happen? Sure they do. Are they making those changes, sure seems like it.
1,221 of us aren’t buying it! Job security is no longer a valid reason to pass over the legacies for a job at SWA. If you do, you’re an idiot! There are other reasons, that’s true…but not job security.
Reply
Old 10-03-2024 | 05:32 PM
  #195  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2022
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Liberty
1,221 of us aren’t buying it! Job security is no longer a valid reason to pass over the legacies for a job at SWA. If you do, you’re an idiot! There are other reasons, that’s true…but not job security.
But you did not get furloughed that is a fact. So you call me a" idiot" because I presented you with a known fact? Thats amazing. So I would argue you have more job security here than at any other carrier, because of the fact SWA has never furloughed and they talk about that a lot. However you get Elliot's hand picked managment team in here, then they could care less, and all bets are off, because all they care about is how much money can they pull out of company. If that happens, I say the chances of pilots getting kicked to street go up 75% maybe even to 100%.
Reply
Old 10-03-2024 | 06:03 PM
  #196  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 767
Likes: 221
Default

Originally Posted by Buchanan10
But you did not get furloughed that is a fact. So you call me a" idiot" because I presented you with a known fact? Thats amazing. So I would argue you have more job security here than at any other carrier, because of the fact SWA has never furloughed and they talk about that a lot. However you get Elliot's hand picked managment team in here, then they could care less, and all bets are off, because all they care about is how much money can they pull out of company. If that happens, I say the chances of pilots getting kicked to street go up 75% maybe even to 100%.
Actually, I was in no way calling you an idiot, specifically. However, now I am. You’ve made me sure of it.
Reply
Old 10-03-2024 | 06:21 PM
  #197  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2022
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Liberty
Actually, I was in no way calling you an idiot, specifically. However, now I am. You’ve made me sure of it.
I think a person who is unwilling to accept facts is more of an idiot than someone who just reminds you of those facts. So what would that make you?
Reply
Old 10-03-2024 | 06:33 PM
  #198  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,633
Likes: 159
Default

Originally Posted by Buchanan10
But did they furlough? No, has every other airline in this country furloughed? Yes, has every other airline filed bankruptcy at least once to get rid of lot of their debt to be able to compete with us? Yes, You may not like those facts, but they are large and speak volumes about SWA. Do changes need to happen? Sure they do. Are they making those changes, sure seems like it.
no, neither Alaska or Jet Blue have ever filed for bankruptcy.
Reply
Old 10-03-2024 | 06:54 PM
  #199  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 4,590
Likes: 434
Default

Originally Posted by PNWFlyer
no, neither Alaska or Jet Blue have ever filed for bankruptcy.
Buchanan sounds like someone who has more koolaid drinking than perspective.

The point isn't whether they furloughed or not. The point is they would have if forces had not intervened. I personally think threatening 1221 pilots with furlough over Christmas (early I might add) as a bargaining chip is terrible.

All of this is beside the point. There is no special sauce at SWA. They rose above their station quickly due to great timing, luck, and market forces. They had an amazing founder who led them there. Now it is just another big airline going through an existential crisis.
Reply
Old 10-03-2024 | 06:56 PM
  #200  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2020
Posts: 2,248
Likes: 107
Default

Originally Posted by PNWFlyer
no, neither Alaska or Jet Blue have ever filed for bankruptcy.
How did an established airline like Alaska cancel pilot pensions without running their PWA through a BK proceeding? SWA and Jet Blue never had pensions to lose.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RockChalk
Technical
35
10-13-2011 01:36 PM
tangoindia
Hangar Talk
10
04-14-2009 07:53 PM
jester
Regional
23
08-09-2007 08:58 PM
kaptendiddy
ExpressJet
11
07-13-2007 07:28 PM
Prospect Pilot
Regional
8
03-17-2007 10:31 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices