Search

Notices

Application window open

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-25-2025 | 02:15 PM
  #151  
CaptTX's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2022
Posts: 247
Likes: 35
From: B737 FO
Default

Originally Posted by ap0312
Yall see the vacancy projection map in the latest crew planning video? The math ain’t mathin or am I wrong?
in recurrent we were told a new base is in fact coming, but what city and when is still TBA, bets on either MCI or AUS with how many DEN is losing over the next 6 months.
Reply
Old 09-25-2025 | 02:38 PM
  #152  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,696
Likes: 325
Default

Originally Posted by CaptTX
in recurrent we were told a new base is in fact coming, but what city and when is still TBA, bets on either MCI or AUS with how many DEN is losing over the next 6 months.
They keep saying they don't want a TPA or S. FL base because they don't want storms taking out 2 bases. Guess they've never seen spring weather in TX if they're actually considering AUS. I can't wait to pop a bag of popcorn next April/May as the email pleas for people to pick up OT hits a fever pitch as 3 bases get shut down. STL/MCI would make the most sense....MCI considering the new terminal and airport not run by no talent clowns (like STL) would have the edge for me.
Reply
Old 09-25-2025 | 02:39 PM
  #153  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Sep 2025
Posts: 39
Likes: 17
From: 737
Default

Originally Posted by CaptTX
in recurrent we were told a new base is in fact coming, but what city and when is still TBA, bets on either MCI or AUS with how many DEN is losing over the next 6 months.
MCI and AUS both make sense than STL.

STL going from 16 RON a/c currently to 13-14 next year, meanwhile MCI increases from 15 to 16. AUS goes from 15 to 18 by next April.

STL airport authority is notoriously difficult to deal with (although so is MNAA and that didn’t stop the BNA base from opening)

AUS and MCI will have more RON a/c than ATL, BNA, LAX, and OAK.

SMF and SAN could easily work as bases, question is if the company wants to deal with California labor rules and regulations any more than they have to.
Reply
Old 09-25-2025 | 02:44 PM
  #154  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Aug 2023
Posts: 85
Likes: 12
Default

Interesting. I vote whatever people would put above LAX because I just wanna get home from BWI.
Reply
Old 09-25-2025 | 04:18 PM
  #155  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Sep 2025
Posts: 39
Likes: 17
From: 737
Default

Originally Posted by ap0312
Interesting. I vote whatever people would put above LAX because I just wanna get home from BWI.
Part of what’s driving BWI so junior is the fact that so many new hires were coming from SkyWest. Very few people from an airline with “west” in its name want to be based in BWI or MCO.

Maybe we’ll hiring some more east coast guys this time around.
Reply
Old 09-26-2025 | 06:29 AM
  #156  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 771
Likes: 78
Default

Other airlines are opening bases to attract pilots. And although hiring is going to be slow here for a while, it would make sense to open a popular base (Austin) vs another poo-hole (MCI or God forbid - STL). So ya... don't expect that kind of logical thinking here. They're more likely to open Scranton or Toledo. Or maybe East Palestine, OH. Because it's what they do. Until Dallas gets a good enema, expect more stupidity.
Reply
Old 09-26-2025 | 07:33 AM
  #157  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Aug 2023
Posts: 85
Likes: 12
Default

Originally Posted by DAnnunzio
Part of what’s driving BWI so junior is the fact that so many new hires were coming from SkyWest. Very few people from an airline with “west” in its name want to be based in BWI or MCO.

Maybe we’ll hiring some more east coast guys this time around.
lol. In my case, Southwest was the first and only to call…so far.

The ****tiest part has been seeing guys get into LAX who were not even displaced from their base but just want to get some ETOPs flying in. Since ROR only applies to vacancies this has been happening. I get it, seniority is key and it’s their right. But it sucks to see.
Reply
Old 09-26-2025 | 07:42 AM
  #158  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 147
Default

Originally Posted by MudhammedCJ
Other airlines are opening bases to attract pilots.
That's an interesting assertion.
Reply
Old 09-26-2025 | 08:13 AM
  #159  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 654
Likes: 132
From: 737CA
Default

Originally Posted by MudhammedCJ
Other airlines are opening bases to attract pilots. And although hiring is going to be slow here for a while, it would make sense to open a popular base (Austin) vs another poo-hole (MCI or God forbid - STL). So ya... don't expect that kind of logical thinking here. They're more likely to open Scranton or Toledo. Or maybe East Palestine, OH. Because it's what they do. Until Dallas gets a good enema, expect more stupidity.
Now that's the funniest post on here in a while. Pilot think. That's exactly how crew planning decides a base. Pilots are not allowed in the room for a reason. That's almost as a good as "we should do more flying out of X airport because it has long runway's". Love it.
Reply
Old 09-26-2025 | 08:15 AM
  #160  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Sep 2025
Posts: 39
Likes: 17
From: 737
Default

Originally Posted by flensr
That's an interesting assertion.
Why else would UA have opened MCO and LAS?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Redbird79
Southwest
33
07-19-2019 11:25 AM
BrickTamblin
Southwest
0
04-24-2019 01:22 PM
A320 Driver
Cargo
2
06-30-2011 09:17 PM
skyrider76
Cargo
1
04-20-2011 05:19 PM
LOBO
Cargo
71
08-21-2007 03:47 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices