Search
Notices

ATL overstaffed SWA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-13-2013, 04:59 PM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Herkdrv's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: Mostly Herks. Soon to be Guppys and FRED
Posts: 280
Default

Originally Posted by 27 driver View Post
Like that makes any difference at all.
Well the vast majority of FO's were willing to staple themselves at year one pay and probation for a year. That's my point.
Herkdrv is offline  
Old 05-13-2013, 05:10 PM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
blakman7's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 270
Default

Originally Posted by shoelu View Post
That is the problem, because you are an outsider that has no access to the the documents pertaining to the deal, you are forced to come to an internet web board and make assumptions based on the BS that is spewed here regularly. You can't make informed decisions without all the info. So forgive me if I disregard your opinion. I will happily listen when someone actually involved loves or hates the deal. The decisions that were made actually effect them and they have access to the information that allows them to make truly informed assessments, the rest is just internet noise.
I actually had and still have access to the documents pertaining to the deal. So therefore, I can and still will have opinions when I see foul play. That's how and why I have made comments that you might not particularly agree with.....especially when you are part of the group that screwed 1,700 pilots. Sorry if its too much for you to handle Shoelu. Just saying........
blakman7 is offline  
Old 05-13-2013, 06:03 PM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2011
Posts: 166
Default

There's a bigger Golden Rule in the world of negotiations--don't overplay your hand--ask the Frontier guys how that worked out. But seriously--we're just beating dead horses into dust talking about the SLI. It was spelled out in black and white in SL-10 that SWA would dictate who went to training based on the "needs of the company". If you're ****ed off about how the transition is going why weren't you screaming for a do-over on the Transition Bid when it was announced the 717's were going away? That was a total game-changer that no one on either side saw coming.
V169 is offline  
Old 05-13-2013, 06:06 PM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
WHACKMASTER's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: DOWNGRADE COMPLETE: Thanks Gary. Thanks SWAPA.
Posts: 6,621
Default

Originally Posted by Herkdrv View Post
Of which how many had active apps at SW?
Complete and utter bu77schit. To answer your question, not as many as you'd like to think. I should know. I fly with them. Not to burst your bubble, but I hear "Never had any interest in working there" more than people having an app in.

Besides, it's completely irrelevant to the partial staple job.
WHACKMASTER is offline  
Old 05-14-2013, 07:49 AM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: CA
Posts: 1,207
Default

Originally Posted by blakman7 View Post
2) All of what you said might be true to some degree, maybe not but the fact still remains that SWA brought in their own people to run things in ATL while they could've transitioned some of the AirTran ATL people. So yes, some of the AirTran folks are being pushed out.....not the SWA employees.
Perhaps you at one time saw some of the documents although I truly doubt it, but when you make comments like this it is very apparent that you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. You clearly are not a member of either group and not receiving timely union or company correspondence regarding these issues.

Originally Posted by blakman7 View Post
I actually had and still have access to the documents pertaining to the deal. So therefore, I can and still will have opinions when I see foul play. That's how and why I have made comments that you might not particularly agree with.....especially when you are part of the group that screwed 1,700 pilots. Sorry if its too much for you to handle Shoelu. Just saying........
It is certainly not too much for me to handle and I will continue to point out when you have absolutely no clue what you are talking about. Because of your lack of timely information that can only be obtained by an individual directly involved you are missing the pieces to an ever evolving situation.
shoelu is offline  
Old 05-14-2013, 08:51 AM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 668
Default

Originally Posted by WHACKMASTER View Post
Complete and utter bu77schit. To answer your question, not as many as you'd like to think. I should know. I fly with them. Not to burst your bubble, but I hear "Never had any interest in working there" more than people having an app in.
Since the acquisition was announced, I have no doubt that all of the sudden there are no ATN pilots who will admit to having an app in a SWA. Just like when a turd of a TA or Side Letter gets voted in by pilots, a year or so later there magically doesn't seem to be anyone still around who voted yes.

Besides, it's completely irrelevant to the partial staple job.
Maybe yes, maybe no. We'll never know for sure. Though the fact that there were a significant number of ATN pilots who had applied to work for SWA (and a significant number who actually did come from ATN pre-acquisition), I believe played a role in how the final SLI proposals were structured by SWA mgmt.
Smokey23 is offline  
Old 05-14-2013, 11:43 AM
  #47  
Reserve Sucks
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 189
Default

Originally Posted by Herkdrv View Post
Well the vast majority of FO's were willing to staple themselves at year one pay and probation for a year. That's my point.

Just because you say it over and over doesn't make it true. There is no way to substantiate you statement. No telling how many would have gone and how many just had apps in everywhere. I know I had apps in all over the place when I was furloughed.
27 driver is offline  
Old 05-14-2013, 03:53 PM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MatthewAMEL's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 735
Default

..........

Last edited by MatthewAMEL; 05-14-2013 at 03:54 PM. Reason: not worth it
MatthewAMEL is offline  
Old 05-14-2013, 05:35 PM
  #49  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Posts: 23
Default

Originally Posted by Smokey23 View Post
Since the acquisition was announced, I have no doubt that all of the sudden there are no ATN pilots who will admit to having an app in a SWA. Just like when a turd of a TA or Side Letter gets voted in by pilots, a year or so later there magically doesn't seem to be anyone still around who voted yes.
It's ironic, it's also hard to find anyone that was part of the 84% that voted in favor of this POS either.

Except MatthewAMEL, he was proud of his yes vote.
luv2bflyin is offline  
Old 05-14-2013, 06:24 PM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2011
Posts: 166
Default

Here's a few facts that can be substantiated. Max pay rates at AT before being purchased by SWA--$152/hr Capt -- $79/hr FO --about what a maxed out FO and 2nd year FO were making at SWA. Number of former AT pilots at SWA--90ish. Number of former SWA pilots at AT--zero. I'm sure there were a group of senior guys at AT who had found their niche and were content to drive to work in ATL or MCO to fly teal jets. But claiming that pre-SWA AirTran was a land of milk and honey for junior guys and not a stepping stone for bigger and better things is madness.
V169 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MatthewAMEL
Southwest
120
11-28-2011 10:26 AM
Sr. Barco
Southwest
270
11-05-2011 10:53 AM
Metal121
Major
20
02-04-2008 08:31 PM
corl737
Major
7
01-22-2006 10:05 PM
SWAjet
Major
44
01-19-2006 12:21 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices