ATL overstaffed SWA
#41
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: Mostly Herks. Soon to be Guppys and FRED
Posts: 280
#42
That is the problem, because you are an outsider that has no access to the the documents pertaining to the deal, you are forced to come to an internet web board and make assumptions based on the BS that is spewed here regularly. You can't make informed decisions without all the info. So forgive me if I disregard your opinion. I will happily listen when someone actually involved loves or hates the deal. The decisions that were made actually effect them and they have access to the information that allows them to make truly informed assessments, the rest is just internet noise.
#43
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2011
Posts: 166
There's a bigger Golden Rule in the world of negotiations--don't overplay your hand--ask the Frontier guys how that worked out. But seriously--we're just beating dead horses into dust talking about the SLI. It was spelled out in black and white in SL-10 that SWA would dictate who went to training based on the "needs of the company". If you're ****ed off about how the transition is going why weren't you screaming for a do-over on the Transition Bid when it was announced the 717's were going away? That was a total game-changer that no one on either side saw coming.
#44
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: DOWNGRADE COMPLETE: Thanks Gary. Thanks SWAPA.
Posts: 6,621
Complete and utter bu77schit. To answer your question, not as many as you'd like to think. I should know. I fly with them. Not to burst your bubble, but I hear "Never had any interest in working there" more than people having an app in.
Besides, it's completely irrelevant to the partial staple job.
Besides, it's completely irrelevant to the partial staple job.
#45
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: CA
Posts: 1,207
2) All of what you said might be true to some degree, maybe not but the fact still remains that SWA brought in their own people to run things in ATL while they could've transitioned some of the AirTran ATL people. So yes, some of the AirTran folks are being pushed out.....not the SWA employees.
I actually had and still have access to the documents pertaining to the deal. So therefore, I can and still will have opinions when I see foul play. That's how and why I have made comments that you might not particularly agree with.....especially when you are part of the group that screwed 1,700 pilots. Sorry if its too much for you to handle Shoelu. Just saying........
#46
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 668
Besides, it's completely irrelevant to the partial staple job.
#47
Reserve Sucks
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 189
Just because you say it over and over doesn't make it true. There is no way to substantiate you statement. No telling how many would have gone and how many just had apps in everywhere. I know I had apps in all over the place when I was furloughed.
#49
On Reserve
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Posts: 23
Since the acquisition was announced, I have no doubt that all of the sudden there are no ATN pilots who will admit to having an app in a SWA. Just like when a turd of a TA or Side Letter gets voted in by pilots, a year or so later there magically doesn't seem to be anyone still around who voted yes.
Except MatthewAMEL, he was proud of his yes vote.
#50
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2011
Posts: 166
Here's a few facts that can be substantiated. Max pay rates at AT before being purchased by SWA--$152/hr Capt -- $79/hr FO --about what a maxed out FO and 2nd year FO were making at SWA. Number of former AT pilots at SWA--90ish. Number of former SWA pilots at AT--zero. I'm sure there were a group of senior guys at AT who had found their niche and were content to drive to work in ATL or MCO to fly teal jets. But claiming that pre-SWA AirTran was a land of milk and honey for junior guys and not a stepping stone for bigger and better things is madness.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post