Search

Notices

Open Trips For JA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-04-2017 | 02:54 PM
  #81  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
From: A-320
Default

The difference that you're not understanding is that the Delta thing was union sanctioned if I read it correctly. I think that makes a big difference. Maybe not.
Reply
Old 05-04-2017 | 03:39 PM
  #82  
gringo's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,125
Likes: 0
From: Under the Frog
Default

Originally Posted by ovrtake92
The difference that you're not understanding is that the Delta thing was union sanctioned if I read it correctly. I think that makes a big difference. Maybe not.
Won't make any difference. The company can (and will) sue.

Whether they'll win is a topic of another debate, but the idea that a company can't sue to force people to work on days off is just incorrect.
Reply
Old 05-04-2017 | 03:39 PM
  #83  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Trowserchilli
Yes they can. It's already been done.
If the amount of open time being covered by folks on days off has significantly changed from prior to negotiations they sure can. In addition if it's causing the company financial duress today they can.
It's not suing one individual for not working on a day off.
The suit goes against the entire group.

I posted the link to the DAL suit against the pilots.
Here's a copy of a portion of the findings.

"(4) There has been a substantial reduction in overtime requests since August of 2000. This reduction dramatically increased throughout November and the first days of December, 2000. The reduction has resulted in the cancellation of hundreds of flights which has seriously inconvenienced tens of thousands of passengers. When compared to the requests for overtime during the same months of 1999, the statistics differ so substantially that the difference can only be explained by the efforts of an undisclosed number of pilots to undermine contract negotiations, seeking leverage for a salary increase.

(5) An undisclosed number of pilots are actively encouraging, through e-mail and other means, the rejection of overtime opportunities. This "no-overtime" campaign has primarily been effectuated through e-mails, many of which rise to the level of intimidation and harassment. These communications include messages encouraging pilots not to respond to phone calls from Delta regarding inverse assignments. Not answering these calls effectively forecloses Delta's ability to staff the flights that are normally staffed by the pilots electing to fly overtime but are suddenly electing not to.

(6) This reduction in requests for over-time is causing harm to Delta and the traveling public. Delta has lost millions of dollars in revenues, rerouting expenses, extra operating costs, and overnight hotel and meal vouchers. Additionally, Delta has suffered loss in the form of good will and traffic which is immeasurable. The public has suffered loss in time and money from the delays and cancellations which is also immeasurable.

(7) Neither the Union leadership nor the present Delta Master Executive Council ("MEC") of ALPA supports this effort and both have, in fact, counseled against it. The Delta MEC serves as ALPA's coordinating council for Delta pilots. Pilots at pilot bases are represented through ALPA Local Executive Councils ("LECs"), whose elected representatives constitute the Delta MEC."
54 cancellations so far today via flightaware. Does the company have a good argument for a lawsuit? Sure, but a lawsuit would just push the aggression to the company that much farther resulting in fueling the fire and.....more cancelled flights costing them more money in the long run.
Bring on the lawsuit...54 cancellations can easily turn into 154 cancellations.
Ladies and gents, I believe things are about to get very ugly...
Reply
Old 05-04-2017 | 03:43 PM
  #84  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
From: A-320
Default

They're also telling the passengers it's all weather related so they don't have to pay them. I'd like to hear the conversation when they go to blame this on us and sue. Things that make you go hmmmmm
Reply
Old 05-04-2017 | 03:46 PM
  #85  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ovrtake92
The difference that you're not understanding is that the Delta thing was union sanctioned if I read it correctly. I think that makes a big difference. Maybe not.
Did you read my post?

Here's one section of the findings I posted which clearly illustrates the union did not support it nor was it backed by the union.

"(7) Neither the Union leadership nor the present Delta Master Executive Council ("MEC") of ALPA supports this effort and both have, in fact, counseled against it. The Delta MEC serves as ALPA's coordinating council for Delta pilots. Pilots at pilot bases are represented through ALPA Local Executive Councils ("LECs"), whose elected representatives constitute the Delta MEC."
Reply
Old 05-04-2017 | 03:48 PM
  #86  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
From: A-320
Default

Originally Posted by Trowserchilli
Did you read my post?

Here's one section of the findings I posted which clearly illustrates the union did not support it nor was it backed by the union.

"(7) Neither the Union leadership nor the present Delta Master Executive Council ("MEC") of ALPA supports this effort and both have, in fact, counseled against it. The Delta MEC serves as ALPA's coordinating council for Delta pilots. Pilots at pilot bases are represented through ALPA Local Executive Councils ("LECs"), whose elected representatives constitute the Delta MEC."
Moot point. The company is blaming this all on weather so they don't have to pay passengers. We're off the hook. Those dummies
Reply
Old 05-04-2017 | 03:53 PM
  #87  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by AldiAirbus
54 cancellations so far today via flightaware. Does the company have a good argument for a lawsuit? Sure, but a lawsuit would just push the aggression to the company that much farther resulting in fueling the fire and.....more cancelled flights costing them more money in the long run.
Bring on the lawsuit.
If they sue the first thing they'll ask for is an injunction. Which has worked against United, AA, DAL and others. The injunction will demand everyone stop whatever actions are taking place.
They may also sue. AA sued the pilots and were awarded 45 million.
That's not what was paid, but was awarded.

My only dog in the fight is hoping you guys get a stellar contract.
Nobody needs negotiations to be stalled via an uneeded law suit.
Good luck.
Reply
Old 05-04-2017 | 03:58 PM
  #88  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
From: A-320
Default

Originally Posted by Trowserchilli
If they sue the first thing they'll ask for is an injunction. Which has worked against United, AA, DAL and others. The injunction will demand everyone stop whatever actions are taking place.
They may also sue. AA sued the pilots and were awarded 45 million.
That's not what was paid, but was awarded.

My only dog in the fight is hoping you guys get a stellar contract.
Nobody needs negotiations to be stalled via an uneeded law suit.
Good luck.
An injunction against the weather? They literally have a hotline set up blaming the weather.
I appreciate your knowledgeable input but I think the company has itself backed into a corner and this is their own making. Not ours. Def not their first incompetence induced meltdown either so there's that.
Reply
Old 05-04-2017 | 04:16 PM
  #89  
Car Ramrod's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
From: Bus FO
Default

Yeah be careful out there guys... otherwise you may end up like Delta.
Reply
Old 05-04-2017 | 04:19 PM
  #90  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,603
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Car Ramrod
Yeah be careful out there guys... otherwise you may end up like Delta.
There some perspective!!!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CaptainCarl
Trans States Airlines
11103
12-31-2015 11:54 AM
newarkblows
Regional
265
08-12-2010 12:21 PM
NoHaz
Cargo
55
01-14-2009 01:08 PM
Airfix
Regional
8
11-20-2008 11:18 AM
MoneyMan
Cargo
34
11-07-2007 12:28 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices