Search

Notices

This thing is a NO!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-04-2018 | 10:35 AM
  #181  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Ed Force One
Yes. If it's an overwhelming NO vote, then yes.
If only 70% on chest thumper central are voting no, that means the real world is 70% yes. If this contract fails, it will be by a shortncurly leading to no leaverage for anything better.
Reply
Old 02-04-2018 | 10:39 AM
  #182  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,603
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by YourMom
Mediator made it clear the company is offering enough. If you want better work rules and this is voted down they will take it from pay and that will possibly perpetuate further delays in a contract. At $5000+ a month loss by voting no I just can't justify it.
The $5k a month is for you and you’re right. I seriously doubt they would bring TA2 with lower pay to improve work rules if they want it to pass.

What’s $5k/mo to you for a few months or a year if you don’t have a job in 10 years or 2 years.
Reply
Old 02-04-2018 | 10:45 AM
  #183  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Default

So...is this thing passing. It looks like sticker shock wore off and people are rationally talking now.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply
Old 02-04-2018 | 11:01 AM
  #184  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by illtake2
So...is this thing passing. It looks like sticker shock wore off and people are rationally talking now.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It will pass if the majority of pilots want to lose their this QOL, and give into the company. The company isn't losing a DIME with this contract. In fact, they probably making money off this contract. #KnowYourWorth

Last edited by Stan Spadowski; 02-04-2018 at 11:30 AM. Reason: To make the Spelling NAZI happy on here. Damn DFW people
Reply
Old 02-04-2018 | 11:11 AM
  #185  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Stan Spadowski
It will pass if the majority of pilots want to loose their this QOL, and given into the company. The company isn't loosing a DIME with this contract. In fact, they probably making money off this contract. #KnowYourWorth
#knowhowtospell
Reply
Old 02-04-2018 | 11:14 AM
  #186  
Tranquility's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 1,691
Likes: 21
From: 60’s Tech, Right
Default

Originally Posted by CLRtoPush
#knowhowtospell
That there is funny....
Reply
Old 02-04-2018 | 11:27 AM
  #187  
Gravy Choker
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Qotsaautopilot
The $5k a month is for you and you’re right. I seriously doubt they would bring TA2 with lower pay to improve work rules if they want it to pass.

What’s $5k/mo to you for a few months or a year if you don’t have a job in 10 years or 2 years.
I understand you don't like the scope, you have been screaming it on the 30 pages you created. It's not iron clad I get it. It sure is better than what we have. A merger is most likely in the future and it has protections for that. No one can predict the future. But our economy is strong now, if this doesn't pass the company will just reshuffle the deck and we are out thousands while we wait. The economy will slow eventually and I don't want to be negotiating TA when the economy goes south.
Reply
Old 02-04-2018 | 02:46 PM
  #188  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,451
Likes: 24
From: Airplanes
Default

Originally Posted by NKSpilot
Dont forget we are unprotected and left exposed on our scope right now....currently...during the length of negotiations.
The scope in the TA doesn't protect you either. Voting YES is a placebo for those with too much fear in them.
Reply
Old 02-05-2018 | 08:33 AM
  #189  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Macjet
The scope in the TA doesn't protect you either. Voting YES is a placebo for those with too much fear in them.


At least know the truth, this scope protects all current pilots on property.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply
Old 02-05-2018 | 09:08 AM
  #190  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 729
Likes: 22
From: Bus CA
Default

Originally Posted by ForTheWin
100% correct! I'm a yes vote. This TA doesn't address all my concerns; however, it definitely raises the bar in many, many areas. Take the gains now and get the clock started on the next bargaining cycle.
You’re an imbecile if you don’t think history will repeat itself. The industry is cyclical, the executives that run it are not even remotely creative. Even if this industry is still in a good condition 5 years from now, you’ll still be stuck bargaining past the amendable date for 2-3 years, exactly because they got a bargain on this contract. It will be no better than the set of conditions you’re under now, except in the year 2025 or 2026. For those who make it to Spirit around the age of 33 and plan to retire at age 65, 8 years under the next contract will be 25% of your entire career. I wouldn’t be in a huge hurry to start that 8 year clock on a painful “fly it and grieve it” contract. Whackmaster is right, don’t sacrifice your leverage. You guys have waited too long to settle now. You have my support, I’ll be at your next picket!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
EWR73FO
United
3
09-26-2012 04:21 PM
bulldog3
Foreign
1
06-20-2008 12:47 PM
АЕРОФЛОТ 214
Regional
28
04-08-2007 08:12 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices