![]() |
Originally Posted by wt93205
(Post 2528596)
I guess that is as good as any reason to just roll over and take whatever they give you. You are right. You would lose all that money if you voted no because you wouldn't want to burden the company with forcing them to pay retro for the additional time. You are so nice. Did you know Southwest is making 258 an hour plus 14.2 percent plus a nice 11.3 percent profit sharing check? Huh. They are so lucky they were just given that...
This TA is a huge improvement in a number of areas. It at least puts us in the ballpark with other carriers instead of the ridiculous pay rates we have now. Voting no means keeping those ridiculous pay rates for possibly a very long time. |
Originally Posted by DickBurns
(Post 2528618)
Dude, will you please do yourself and all of us a massive favor? Engage Art Luby personally via email. Air all of your concerns and possible situations that could hurt us. Everything you're saying on here, say that to him. And, by all means, post the exchange on here for everyone to see ( feel free to de-identify). You may be 100% correct, I don't know. You're so sure about the holes in section 1, challenge the gut that wrote it.
He must be low on billable hours this month- he said he was going to back off scope and lay low but I see on page 7 he’s running his mouth again dreaming up whackadoodle scope scenarios while twisting his mustache. |
Originally Posted by otter1
(Post 2528619)
The point is I don't think we'd ever make it up. Being nice, or snarky like your post, doesn't have anything to do with it. It's about what's realistic. Most captains making over $200K/year is a pretty good raise. I'm not "rolling over" but making a decision that I feel is the best one. The ALPA financial analyst, the MEC and the NC feel this is the best deal we can get. I doubt you know better than they do. They showed the graphs with their facts. Do you have facts that show the company can sustain much higher rates and still be profitable and attract investment? The NMB was unwilling to push for more money. So what leverage do we have? We'd still be under the TRO as well.
This TA is a huge improvement in a number of areas. It at least puts us in the ballpark with other carriers instead of the ridiculous pay rates we have now. Voting no means keeping those ridiculous pay rates for possibly a very long time. What is realistic is you just don't want to wait any longer. The company has won. So if the MEC are such experts ask them for the powerball numbers. What they say is as good as gold. They know everything according to you... |
Originally Posted by falcon2000aj
(Post 2528613)
Love the SWA comparisons. Did you know SWA CA's made half of what NWA widebody FO's made in the mid 90's?
|
Originally Posted by wt93205
(Post 2528740)
Excuses, excuses....
What is realistic is you just don't want to wait any longer. The company has won. So if the MEC are such experts ask them for the powerball numbers. What they say is as good as gold. They know everything according to you... |
Originally Posted by Dukeuno
(Post 2528607)
You do know SWA wasn’t doing this back in the 90s when they were trying to grow. ( they did have stock options and profit sharing. They had a better management team that cared). Their pay was at the bottom or close to the bottom of the industry. So you can’t compare Spirit to SWA right now. SWA 700 planes, 9200 pilots, Spirit 115 planes around 2000 pilots. Would I like more, hell ya, but I know this place needs to grow and I believe this is the best we can achieve right now. It’s not worth me to lose the LTD, Scope, DC, and pay raise to wait for who knows how long and who knows for how much more? Maybe it goes the other way and we could actually lose some of these gains, no one knows. You willing to gamble on that?
Plus if you want SWA pay and benefits they are hiring around 750 this year. |
Originally Posted by Tjamaica
(Post 2528749)
Ha the NC, MEC and the ALPA lawyers? You mean the people that have all of the factual information? The people that have combed through real numbers? The people at the table w/ the NMB and the company? People that have been working on contracts longer than some have been flying airplanes? Yes, they know more than you, me and Joe Pilot. Much more
|
Originally Posted by wt93205
(Post 2528752)
The kool aid is strong in this one! :D
|
Originally Posted by Tjamaica
(Post 2528757)
So you think I am wrong?
|
Originally Posted by Tjamaica
(Post 2528749)
Ha the NC, MEC and the ALPA lawyers? You mean the people that have all of the factual information? The people that have combed through real numbers? The people at the table w/ the NMB and the company? People that have been working on contracts longer than some have been flying airplanes? Yes, they know more than you, me and Joe Pilot. Much more
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:57 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands