Notices

750 flights/day

Old 08-11-2020 | 01:21 PM
  #411  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 663
Likes: 46
Default

Originally Posted by ASAPsafetyGUY
Or a drop in the bucket for the top 1 percenters.
it only take $521k for salary or about 10M net worth to be in the top 1% in the US. Not exactly a drop in the bucket for all those in the 1%
Reply
Old 08-11-2020 | 01:59 PM
  #412  
Tranquility's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 1,691
Likes: 21
From: 60’s Tech, Right
Default

Originally Posted by AllOva736
it only take $521k for salary or about 10M net worth to be in the top 1% in the US. Not exactly a drop in the bucket for all those in the 1%
You say only like it's water off a duck's back, but only 1% of this country are at that point.... It's no small feat. Personally, I'm 'only' in the top 2-3% for my age for both net worth and income.... I guess I'm slacking.
Reply
Old 08-11-2020 | 02:42 PM
  #413  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,603
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Mtnbikemike
Yeah exactly, because adding trillions in debt to subsidize airline pilot jobs so we can all sit around is all that matters.
Now is actually a good time to be short sighted and not big picture.

Being on reserve especially as a commuter isn’t sitting around. Further those not on reserve are working everyday and if those below them weren’t on reserve they would be and they would be sitting around “doing nothing”. Pre Covid all airlines had reserves and many “did nothing” as you incorrectly describe.

Further, in your lifetime tell me how the national debt increasing has affected your life in any way for the worse? And while it’s the highest it’s ever been it’s not the highest it’s ever been as a percentage of GDP. We aren’t Greece. We actually can spend our way out of this.

I’m not advocating for an endless welfare state because if you never get back to producing then servicing the debt does become a problem, but spending big for a short term crisis actually makes perfect sense. As long as GDP grows faster than the debt over time it literally never has to be paid back in its entirety. Old pieces get paid off as new pieces get added. This can go on forever as long as GDP over time grows at a faster rate than the debt. 2020 is a point on chart and while this year the debt will grow and GDP will contract it’s only a small point in history. You obviously cannot do it forever but history shows that not spending enough now will cost more on revenues later than you save today.

Your life and finances have a finite horizon. The United States does not. Stop thinking about it like your household budget.
Reply
Old 08-11-2020 | 02:50 PM
  #414  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Default

Actually our GDP to debt ratio isn’t that great. By a long shot.
136.6%
Reply
Old 08-11-2020 | 03:03 PM
  #415  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Qotsaautopilot
Now is actually a good time to be short sighted and not big picture.

Being on reserve especially as a commuter isn’t sitting around. Further those not on reserve are working everyday and if those below them weren’t on reserve they would be and they would be sitting around “doing nothing”. Pre Covid all airlines had reserves and many “did nothing” as you incorrectly describe.

Further, in your lifetime tell me how the national debt increasing has affected your life in any way for the worse? And while it’s the highest it’s ever been it’s not the highest it’s ever been as a percentage of GDP. We aren’t Greece. We actually can spend our way out of this.

I’m not advocating for an endless welfare state because if you never get back to producing then servicing the debt does become a problem, but spending big for a short term crisis actually makes perfect sense. As long as GDP grows faster than the debt over time it literally never has to be paid back in its entirety. Old pieces get paid off as new pieces get added. This can go on forever as long as GDP over time grows at a faster rate than the debt. 2020 is a point on chart and while this year the debt will grow and GDP will contract it’s only a small point in history. You obviously cannot do it forever but history shows that not spending enough now will cost more on revenues later than you save today.

Your life and finances have a finite horizon. The United States does not. Stop thinking about it like your household budget.
Thanks for looking that up on Wikipedia. Not sure where I would get that wealth of information without you Boy Scout.
I just don’t want my grandchildren’s children and their children paying for it. Maybe with Covid, there will be a baby bump and increase GDP 30 years from now.
Reply
Old 08-11-2020 | 03:04 PM
  #416  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,603
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Jimdunbar
Actually our GDP to debt ratio isn’t that great. By a long shot.
136.6%
again, a point in time. You obviously cannot deficit spend and cut taxes forever. But not spending a lot on Covid relief (short term big problem) will cost the country much more in revenues down line than it would save now by not spending it. Crisis stimulus isn’t like social security of welfare. It’s a short term solution for a short term problem.
Reply
Old 08-11-2020 | 03:13 PM
  #417  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,603
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Mtnbikemike
Thanks for looking that up on Wikipedia. Not sure where I would get that wealth of information without you Boy Scout.
I just don’t want my grandchildren’s children and their children paying for it. Maybe with Covid, there will be a baby bump and increase GDP 30 years from now.
not off wiki btw, but it’s misinformation that the national debt is a big scary thing and a valid reason to not spend stimulus money on a crisis when it’s very much needed. Also the airlines as a whole got less than $50 billion of a multi trillion dollar package. Keeping the airlines solvent and held together for now is worth the relative small dollars. Why? Because it’s an investment that will pay back more in future tax revenues and law makers know it but unfortunately their kitchen table economist constituents don’t.

edit:
and if for no other reason, if you are a pilot think of all the money you’ve paid in taxes in years past. Look at this as getting some of it back. If you’re too senior to be furloughed or downgraded look at as in investment in your job security (stability of the company). And if the feds won’t grant the airlines the money who do you think they will look to for the grant. at the very least an investment in your relative seniority that will slide back if your brothers are let go.
Reply
Old 08-11-2020 | 03:19 PM
  #418  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 663
Likes: 46
Default

Originally Posted by Tranquility
You say only like it's water off a duck's back, but only 1% of this country are at that point.... It's no small feat. Personally, I'm 'only' in the top 2-3% for my age for both net worth and income.... I guess I'm slacking.
I’m not saying it’s nothing, just stating you don’t have to be a billionaire to be in that group. I got my violin ready if you need it though.
Reply
Old 08-11-2020 | 03:20 PM
  #419  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Qotsaautopilot
not off wiki btw, but it’s misinformation that the national debt is a big scary thing and a valid reason to not spend stimulus money on a crisis when it’s very much needed. Also the airlines as a whole got less than $50 billion of a multi trillion dollar package. Keeping the airlines solvent and held together for now is worth the relative small dollars. Why? Because it’s an investment that will pay back more in future tax revenues and law makers know it but unfortunately their kitchen table economist constituents don’t.
Just razzing you. I agree with most of what you are saying. I think that’s what’s sustaining the market right now. Peeps are still spending on non essential goods and services. The $600 extra in unemployment as well as the stimulus have many feeling rich. It’s helping drive the economy and keep it from taking a nose dive.
I just don’t agree with another stimulus that has so much pork that is non Covid.
Reply
Old 08-11-2020 | 04:14 PM
  #420  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Tranquility
Dead on arrival or not, it is the responsibility of the Senate to do their ****ing job and pass their version. If the President vetoes what blended version the Congress passes, it’s on him. Like or dislike what’s in HR6800, the House did their job; they passed something, a few months ago in fact. The Senate as usual has done squat and had ample time to negotiate with the House, or to pass their own version and meet in conference..... But, McConnell chose to do NOTHING...
...And Shumer decided to do nothing. There, you were missing part of the sentence. You can't have far left radical wants and propose that as "a deal," then tell their Republican counterparts they need to come to the center. It was a disingenuous comment plain and simple, partisan hack politics, and yes-I blame both sides. But to put this solely on McConnell is wrong too. Remember 49-51 is not negotiations.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SaintNick
Major
11
10-08-2019 07:33 PM
CubWrangler
Regional
29
05-02-2019 09:41 AM
BoilerUP
The Boneyard
4
11-29-2007 05:38 PM
rickair7777
Regional
9
05-29-2007 05:24 PM
GliderCFI
Regional
18
04-26-2007 08:10 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices