Notices

Attrition

Old 09-16-2021 | 11:43 AM
  #31  
BeechedJet's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 808
Likes: 0
From: to-go plate at hotel buffet
Default

Breaking news 180,000 high fives to be paid out over the next five meltdowns.
Reply
Old 09-16-2021 | 11:47 AM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2021
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
From: Left. Cool plane
Default

Originally Posted by acecrackshot
No. It has next to nothing to do with that. If its a shortage, its a shortage of pilots willing to extremely deferred and completely speculative compensation vs. actual ROI on their education and experience.

What is your next question?
I agree. Fewer people are interested in investing such ludicrous amounts of money into a career that pays very low wages entry level for highly skilled and educated backgrounds.
Reply
Old 09-16-2021 | 11:48 AM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2021
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
From: Left. Cool plane
Default

Originally Posted by MCDUmanipulator
so no pilot shortage is why AAG is throwing 180k at its regional pilots to keep them in their pipeline vs just hiring elsewhere?
Because large attrition at the regional is figuratively a shot in the foot for
Legacy Carriers. The regionals are having a more difficult time recruiting than the majors. If there is a lot of attrition for instance at SkyWest/United Express to United, United is doing itself a disservice by imposing high turnover and staffing issues amongst its regional partners that serve United's very product.

The shortage will never be at the upper echelon of the industry such as United FedEx American etc.
Reply
Old 09-16-2021 | 11:58 AM
  #34  
JulesWinfield's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 2,837
Likes: 278
Default

Originally Posted by Skycap876
Because large attrition at the regional is figuratively a shot in the foot for
Legacy Carriers. The regionals are having a more difficult time recruiting than the majors. If there is a lot of attrition for instance at SkyWest/United Express to United, United is doing itself a disservice by imposing high turnover and staffing issues amongst its regional partners that serve United's very product.

The shortage will never be at the upper echelon of the industry such as United FedEx American etc.
Sure, but the big 3 have all stated they are going to hire 1000+ each next year.
Reply
Old 09-16-2021 | 01:49 PM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2021
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
From: Left. Cool plane
Default

Originally Posted by JulesWinfield
Sure, but the big 3 have all stated they are going to hire 1000+ each next year.
No disagreement, plenty of opportunities ahead but still no shortage at that level in my opinion.

We will see what the next few years bring. I could be vastly incorrect.
Reply
Old 09-16-2021 | 01:50 PM
  #36  
That/It/Thang
 
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 3,500
Likes: 362
Default

Originally Posted by Skycap876
I agree. Fewer people are interested in investing such ludicrous amounts of money into a career that pays very low wages entry level for highly skilled and educated backgrounds.
Yet 10-20 years ago guys were lining up for the job that paid much less, even taking inflation into account.

And 20+ years ago it paid even less and guys quid buy their first officer jobs to get experience.

So I’m not buying that guys simply don’t want the job for the pay. The pay is way up on all levels, and now we have signing bonuses.
Reply
Old 09-16-2021 | 07:42 PM
  #37  
Ed Force One's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 778
Likes: 16
From: A320 CA
Default

Regional signing bonuses are nothing more than a way to avoid paying higher wages. It's a much cheaper solution to pay new guys a bonus than pay the entire company a wage that makes them consider long term employment. TBH, I'm surprised the unions signed off on it, but then again, regional unions have never held any power.

As for attrition, can it really be any worse than historical attrition here? The majority of us are too new and have only been told stories of how bad Spirit used to be. I imagine attrition was way higher 10-15 years ago than it ever will be again, but that's only my opinion, not based in any factual info.

As unfortunate as it is, it's far cheaper for the company to train and lose a small number of pilots than to pay us all "industry standard."

But that doesn't stop me from cracking a small smile every time I hear of someone leaving.
Reply
Old 09-17-2021 | 04:24 AM
  #38  
Chimpy's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,877
Likes: 199
Default

Yeah well we are all going to be looking for new jobs if we keep touching down midway down the runway when we circle to land on 29 in EWR. We arent SWA, not sure we can survive an overrun if someone gets hurt.
Reply
Old 09-17-2021 | 07:21 AM
  #39  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Chimpy
Yeah well we are all going to be looking for new jobs if we keep touching down midway down the runway when we circle to land on 29 in EWR. We arent SWA, not sure we can survive an overrun if someone gets hurt.
LOE scenario #4 on the way

maybe they make it a CA only landing if it’s a
visual to 29
Reply
Old 09-17-2021 | 07:58 AM
  #40  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2021
Posts: 439
Likes: 30
Default

Originally Posted by Chimpy
Yeah well we are all going to be looking for new jobs if we keep touching down midway down the runway when we circle to land on 29 in EWR. We arent SWA, not sure we can survive an overrun if someone gets hurt.
Oh, that's a fun approach. I was Newark based at my last airline so I did that approach many times. I did it in the Bus for the first time a few weeks ago. I actually kinda showed the captain how to do it. It's really not a hard approach at all and not a terribly short runway. Just use medium autobrake and don't float in the flare.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dadman3000
Piedmont Airlines
6
12-06-2019 11:32 AM
havick206
Envoy Airlines
0
04-12-2018 07:24 AM
ERJ Driver
Regional
10
01-19-2008 01:17 PM
RedBaron007
Regional
67
04-30-2007 08:52 AM
palgia841
Regional
3
03-04-2007 07:36 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices