![]() |
Originally Posted by Macjet
(Post 3370146)
All of the executives will receive a bonus equal to 150% of their annual base salary. It's in the merger filing.
My ratification bonus minimum will also be 150% of my annual base salary. That's in addition to this third rate contract being propelled into its proper place as the new 5th largest airline. My 'yes' vote is going to be exxxxxppppeeeeennnnnssssssiiiiiiivvvvveeeeee. |
Originally Posted by Singlecoil
(Post 3370355)
The JCBA has a backstop of binding arbitration, does it not? You may not get to cast your no vote.
are we really expecting some kind of substantial gains??? I mean let’s hope so but I don’t know if we get too far ahead of ourselves |
Originally Posted by Halon1211
(Post 3370405)
Spirit hasn’t posted a profit since Covid yet, and Frontier airlines barely posted a profit.
are we really expecting some kind of substantial gains??? I mean let’s hope so but I don’t know if we get too far ahead of ourselves |
Originally Posted by dualinput
(Post 3370409)
What I’m worth is exclusive of how they decide to run the rest of their business to make profits. They don’t ask the gas man to pay less to make profits happen. They pay for the fuel whatever the cost so the airplanes continue to move. Same for us IMO
|
Originally Posted by Halon1211
(Post 3370421)
Okay, but where are they going to get the money to pay you what your worth? If they themselves aren’t turning a profit or barely
|
Originally Posted by OneplusF
(Post 3370427)
Name an airline that went bankrupt due to pilot salaries?
good read. Although I must admit I hate the Guardian. |
Originally Posted by Halon1211
(Post 3370421)
Okay, but where are they going to get the money to pay you what your worth? If they themselves aren’t turning a profit or barely
We are a variable cost, and while yes we are an expensive cost, we are certainly not what is standing in the way of profitability. The more we flights we operate, the more money they make. Also, Spirit turning massive profits is not the goal, we have a high plow back ratio, which means we put a lot of money back into the company to fuel growth rather than pay shareholders dividends. As long as our bills are paid and we have some operating cash on hand, we don’t expect to turn a massive profit as it all goes towards driving growth. If we can’t make our obligations, we would have to take on more and more debt, which some airlines did to cover operational expenses. We used cheap govt money which was smart, but we didn’t get over burdened like AA. Obviously these are very broad strokes, but the point is anyone who tries to rationalize low contract expectations on the belief that Spirit can’t afford to pay us is misinformed. |
Originally Posted by Halon1211
(Post 3370440)
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.the...ptcy-cut-costs
good read. Although I must admit I hate the Guardian. |
Originally Posted by Halon1211
(Post 3370421)
Okay, but where are they going to get the money to pay you what your worth? If they themselves aren’t turning a profit or barely
|
You would think that the small increase in CASM for a competitive pilot pay scale pales in comparison to the drop in RASM for cancellations and underutilization of new aircraft deliveries.
|
QUESTION from an F9 guy. Does your training cadre (sim and line check airman) have their union LEC and is there language in your CBA addressing that? My old ALPA regional had such an LEC. I don’t have your current CBA handy anymore.
Edit: just found your FEB2018 Tentative Agreement. Reading Section 9 now. Looks like it’s all spelled out and is bargained by the union. That’s great we literally have a couple guys in standards and training that can’t get anywhere with the VP of Flt Ops to adjust our rates, which are close yours but we both trail the industry average. Our lack of language for training cadre is leftover from our FAPA (in-house union) days where we drew a line between our training and union guys, so the union never negotiated language in the contract for training staff. |
Seems like it got lost in the merger craziness, but more alignment between F9 and NK. NK joins the 1500 hour club with their “Spirt Direct” program with ATP, while F9 has been doing this with Purdue for a while. Legacies might be sucking up all the ULCC pilots but the ULCCs aren’t going to leave anything for the regionals. Looks like the race for flight school partnerships is on, I give regionals 12-18months left.
|
Originally Posted by 310skying
(Post 3370473)
Seems like it got lost in the merger craziness, but more alignment between F9 and NK. NK joins the 1500 hour club with their “Spirt Direct” program with ATP, while F9 has been doing this with Purdue for a while. Legacies might be sucking up all the ULCC pilots but the ULCCs aren’t going to leave anything for the regionals. Looks like the race for flight school partnerships is on, I give regionals 12-18months left.
|
Originally Posted by Singlecoil
(Post 3370355)
The JCBA has a backstop of binding arbitration, does it not? You may not get to cast your no vote.
|
Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
(Post 3370490)
Both sides have to agree to arbitration, ALPA would never agree to arbitration. It’s always turned town
|
Originally Posted by MtnPeakCruiser
(Post 3370459)
QUESTION from an F9 guy. Does your training cadre (sim and line check airman) have their union LEC and is there language in your CBA addressing that? My old ALPA regional had such an LEC. I don’t have your current CBA handy anymore.
Edit: just found your FEB2018 Tentative Agreement. Reading Section 9 now. Looks like it’s all spelled out and is bargained by the union. That’s great we literally have a couple guys in standards and training that can’t get anywhere with the VP of Flt Ops to adjust our rates, which are close yours but we both trail the industry average. Our lack of language for training cadre is leftover from our FAPA (in-house union) days where we drew a line between our training and union guys, so the union never negotiated language in the contract for training staff. |
Originally Posted by Halon1211
(Post 3370405)
Spirit hasn’t posted a profit since Covid yet, and Frontier airlines barely posted a profit.
are we really expecting some kind of substantial gains??? I mean let’s hope so but I don’t know if we get too far ahead of ourselves You better not go over to the AA forum and try to spread that logic 😳😳 |
Originally Posted by Halon1211
(Post 3370405)
Spirit hasn’t posted a profit since Covid yet, and Frontier airlines barely posted a profit.
are we really expecting some kind of substantial gains??? I mean let’s hope so but I don’t know if we get too far ahead of ourselves |
Originally Posted by Halon1211
(Post 3370421)
Okay, but where are they going to get the money to pay you what your worth? If they themselves aren’t turning a profit or barely
They paid the C suite literally tens of millions of dollars just for the work to make the deal happen and get it closed. Sorry if I don’t care where they get the money for us from. That’s their job. Our job is to go in and get what’s ours and to make it as big as possible. It’s not our job to rationalize if it’s possible. That their job. |
Originally Posted by 310skying
(Post 3370473)
Seems like it got lost in the merger craziness, but more alignment between F9 and NK. NK joins the 1500 hour club with their “Spirt Direct” program with ATP, while F9 has been doing this with Purdue for a while. Legacies might be sucking up all the ULCC pilots but the ULCCs aren’t going to leave anything for the regionals. Looks like the race for flight school partnerships is on, I give regionals 12-18months left.
|
Originally Posted by dualinput
(Post 3370518)
Your training pilots are not represented within ALPA even at their base LEC? Are they considered management? Maybe I misunderstood what you were saying.
|
Originally Posted by dualinput
(Post 3370515)
Virgin and Alaska did go to arbitration for their JCBA. I don’t remember why bc yes arbitration has to be agreed to in normal section 6 negotiations
|
Originally Posted by MtnPeakCruiser
(Post 3370699)
Sim Instructors, Sim Check Airmen, and Line Check all stay on the seniority list, and are marked no bids for “Training” for those specific months, they can go back to the line any month they want. Our jobs as line pilots on the seniority list are protected and represented by the union, however there is no language for us regarding compensation regarding training duties, in the sim or on line performing OE or line checks. That said we have very good people in charge of sim checks and standards so it’s not one of those places you don’t want to be. However, collectively negotiating our rates isn’t something that the union handles; quite honestly it needs to.
Instructors were approached multiple times in negotiations over crafting training language. There was a group that didn’t want to be included in the contract. I’m going to guess they didn’t want to have handcuffs placed on them in respect to max hrs, trading slots amongst themselves, ect…. Having said that I agree, they need to be included. |
Originally Posted by BeatNavy
(Post 3370722)
I could be off in my recollection, but I think Alaska allowed arbitration in their CBA. Virgin I don’t think had a CBA.
Filler and *******. |
Originally Posted by Halon1211
(Post 3370421)
Okay, but where are they going to get the money to pay you what your worth? If they themselves aren’t turning a profit or barely
Point is, you can't run or expand the airline without pilots, and in today's environment the only way to keep classes full is for the company to open the pocketbook. |
Originally Posted by biigD
(Post 3370781)
AA is in the ****tiest financial position of anyone, and we fully expect a new contract soon (whether that happens or not who knows, but regardless we expect it) The company has already agreed to significant gains, it just remains to be seen what that ends up looking like.
Point is, you can't run or expand the airline without pilots, and in today's environment the only way to keep classes full is for the company to open the pocketbook. And others have said, not my F’in problem where the money comes from, let Bendo beg for cash at the red lights. Pilots are more expensive, that’s their problem. Just like in years past when contracts were gutted and we had a surplus of pilots was our problem. FUPM |
Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
(Post 3370893)
True.
And others have said, not my F’in problem where the money comes from, let Bendo beg for cash at the red lights. Pilots are more expensive, that’s their problem. Just like in years past when contracts were gutted and we had a surplus of pilots was our problem. FUPM But yeah, if it’s really a better business model it ought to be able to support a competitive pay scale - even for new hires. |
Originally Posted by Excargodog
(Post 3370897)
Damn, that’s twice we’ve agreed now. That’s almost scary.
But yeah, if it’s really a better business model it ought to be able to support a competitive pay scale - even for new hires. |
Originally Posted by biigD
(Post 3370781)
AA is in the ****tiest financial position of anyone, and we fully expect a new contract soon (whether that happens or not who knows, but regardless we expect it) The company has already agreed to significant gains, it just remains to be seen what that ends up looking like.
Point is, you can't run or expand the airline without pilots, and in today's environment the only way to keep classes full is for the company to open the pocketbook. they still try to find cheap ways to solve the problem. ( creativity is important, listen to the market and think of new ways to tell our stories……) WTF is this |
Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
(Post 3370900)
McDonalds was forced to increase pay to $20/hr in some spots to get workers….McDonalds. So if Ronald McDonald can afford these raises out of necessity, no different.
He’s the back office, light duty, hey is it possible to get the hazelnut flavor coffee mate creamer cop. He’s the rack up the overtime working the county fair, Boy Scout parade, and weekend outlet mall parking lot cop. He’s the almost got us kicked out of the shooting range for flashing innocent civilians, and me, one too many times. I bought him a rape whistle for Xmas, for those who get the reference. With overtime and benefits, he pulled down over 230k last year. It’s all available online. Either we get paid this contract or I’m quitting and joining the sheriffs office. |
Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
(Post 3370900)
McDonalds was forced to increase pay to $20/hr in some spots to get workers….McDonalds. So if Ronald McDonald can afford these raises out of necessity, no different.
|
Originally Posted by TransWorld
(Post 3370981)
My McDonalds went to kiosks except for the drive through and one counter. Six kiosks, two humans. Kiosks, after initial capital cost are $0 per hour. And those other workers they replaced now get $20/hr at 0 hrs = $0.
|
It’s not really their choice right now in my opinion. They either pay or go under. There’s a going rate and that’s what will be asked for. And they don’t even really have time to fight it either. They aren’t dumb they knew this when they agreed to merge.
|
|
Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
(Post 3370900)
McDonalds was forced to increase pay to $20/hr in some spots to get workers….McDonalds. So if Ronald McDonald can afford these raises out of necessity, no different.
And if inflation is going to continue at the present rate, we really need to think about indexing the pay scale to the CPI or some other index. Social Security does that, Military retirement does that. Heck, even bank lines of credit go for LIBOR plus however many points. While I would like to think that inflation is going to mellow out after the supply chains get fixed, even just two years at 7.5% is a huge hit. Imagine if it were to last five years without renegotiation…. |
Originally Posted by TransWorld
(Post 3370981)
My McDonalds went to kiosks except for the drive through and one counter. Six kiosks, two humans. Kiosks, after initial capital cost are $0 per hour. And those other workers they replaced now get $20/hr at 0 hrs = $0.
|
Originally Posted by JulesWinfield
(Post 3371045)
Don't be so quick to dance on their grave. The same thing will happen to pilots.
|
Originally Posted by Halon1211
(Post 3371055)
the same engineers that made the 737 MAX are going to be the ones that make it happen, right?
This is what Amazon looked like 20 years ago when they were selling books on a new thing called the internet. Around the time this screenshot was taken, there were quite a few FEs on mainline aircraft. What happened to those guys? |
Originally Posted by JulesWinfield
(Post 3371062)
https://img.huffingtonpost.com/asset..._970_noupscale
This is what Amazon looked like 20 years ago when they were selling books on a new thing called the internet. Around the time this screenshot was taken, there were quite a few FEs on mainline aircraft. What happened to those guys? |
We need to get paid and get our 401ks stuffed before the robots take our jobs.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:29 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands