![]() |
Wow. 21 pages in and no SLI argument / fights. I'm impressed APC :)
|
Originally Posted by Xdashdriver
(Post 3368512)
No, it's in the original agreement. IIRC same language as the previous contract.
|
Originally Posted by TheFly
(Post 3368500)
NK-ers, is there talk of hiring slowing down as a result of the merger?
|
Originally Posted by dualinput
(Post 3368386)
This kind of attitude gets you shiit and it exactly why we have the contracts we have. You do more with less everyday compared to other airlines in the same planes. There is absolutely zero reason we cannot achieve the highest paying narrow body contract (not some nonsense like sun country dos+5) and absolute best work rules. Yes they can drag their feet and stall as usual and yes they can try and keep us separate for as long as possible but if they want to grow and attract and retain pilots they are going to have to go big. We get to decide. Know when to hold them and know when to fold them. They are going to bluff all the way to the end.
|
Originally Posted by TheFly
(Post 3368500)
NK-ers, is there talk of hiring slowing down as a result of the merger?
|
Originally Posted by Macjet
(Post 3368539)
We hired 69 in January and lost 53 for a net of 16 new hires. We need to increase that by a factor of 6 and this announcement just made Firit an even uglier option compared to anywhere else. I'd think it would have to increase, exponentially, to cover to mass exodus off stage left.
And I TOTALLY agree. We both have an uphill battle. I don't know how many NK guys are still around that remember the Franke/Biffle show but it's not necessarily all that great. How they were able to stay in charge is a wonder. Given their track record and the silliness we both experience on a day to day basis on the line, the ultimate focus has GOT to be the contract and getting - what I consider - widebody rates (since we haul more passengers than legacy 75/76). With a me too. Trust me, w/ our combined CASM and increased efficiencies, they can more than afford it. This is the time. The most important aspect of both of our business models at this point has to be growth and retention and despite a merger, that just doesn't happen w/ legacy efforts and their pay scales. |
I’ve seen a lot of concern about losing the ability to drop to 0 with Frontiers contract but our min of 60 can be fairly lucrative as well. I had a big example of mine typed up but it was confusing out of context. In short, I started the month with 85 hours in my base MCO but ended the month with 60 in LAS and DEN, didn’t fly a single trip in MCO, and had 22 days off. Oh and I’m still on probation and that was the first month I could hold a line. Buuuuut I hope we keep the 0 hour clause. Sounds cool.
Also with reserve. Yes it’s pretty easy to manipulate your schedule. It has become more difficult as we become short on crews but you can, subject to limitations, swap reserve days, drop reserve days, pick up open time on days off, aggressive reserve (pick up open time trips while on reserve the day prior to their beginning), and get released early. It’s not perfect and I have ideas to improve it but it’s not too bad. I really hope we stand together and fight to make this place awesome. The prospective seniority lists that circulated today were based on relative % and DOH. I only was 16# apart from each method. In short I (mostly) don’t care how they integrate as long as we keep growing. That will only happen if we take the best of both contracts and make this place the envy of our competition. I look forward to Frontspears continued success. |
Originally Posted by daOldMan
(Post 3368485)
But this will still be an ULCC. If you want a real OCC and real support, go to a legacy airline. If you want a garage sale type airline with folding tables in the OCC, go to an ULCC.
This merger will not make Sprontier a real legacy airline. It is just a larger ULCC. Period. |
Originally Posted by gonyon
(Post 3368316)
I think this time is different because of the labor scarcity. They need to polish this place up quickly if they want to grow
my mans!!!!! He’s back! deeZ nutz |
Originally Posted by Xdashdriver
(Post 3368498)
25.M.3 ..."At no time shall a Pilot be allowed to Drop below fifty (50) hours of Pay Credit..."
|
So leave it to you to toss the grenade and get it going. You never cease to amaze me. Go back to our page and defend Constance’s actions in nyc instead of starting a fight here
Originally Posted by ShyGuy
(Post 3368519)
Wow. 21 pages in and no SLI argument / fights. I'm impressed APC :)
|
Originally Posted by Ala5ka
(Post 3368626)
So leave it to you to toss the grenade and get it going. You never cease to amaze me. Go back to our page and defend Constance’s actions in nyc instead of starting a fight here
Not much to talk about with the SLI… ALPA to ALPA. If you look at both list, your seniority based on DOH a lone will give you almost the same % within the new mega ULCC. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro |
The difference in flexibility between Spirit and F9 is simple
At Spirit you can drop as much flying as the system will allow and never hear a word from a manager Chief pilot or the training department unless you're going to dequal. At F9, if you don't maintain at least 60 hours per month 6 months a year, and 70 hours per month 6 months per year, expect to hear from your Chief pilot. The work-life balance at Spirit is far superior. |
Originally Posted by Skycap876
(Post 3368645)
The difference in flexibility between Spirit and F9 is simple
At Spirit you can drop as much flying as the system will allow and never hear a word from a manager Chief pilot or the training department unless you're going to dequal. At F9, if you don't maintain at least 60 hours per month 6 months a year, and 70 hours per month 6 months per year, expect to hear from your Chief pilot. The work-life balance at Spirit is far superior. |
Just want to pop in and say that I am so pleased how well everyone is working together so far. If we can keep this up as a pilot group, we will be in for a big win. Together we are much better than seperated. Thankfully the differences in our current contracts are small, so this should go fairly smoothly, at least on our end. Glad to be partnering up with the F9'ers.
|
Originally Posted by cyio
(Post 3368661)
just want to pop in and say that i am so pleased how well everyone is working together so far. If we can keep this up as a pilot group, we will be in for a big win. Together we are much better than seperated. Thankfully the differences in our current contracts are small, so this should go fairly smoothly, at least on our end. Glad to be partnering up with the f9'ers.
|
Originally Posted by Chimpy
(Post 3368618)
my mans!!!!! He’s back! deeZ nutz
….. |
Hello fellow F9'ers. Looking forward to working with y'all. Just a few questions/rumors I've heard.
Is it true that it's 50% scheduled deadhead pay? I read that in the contract comparison our union put out and my eyes almost popped out of my head. Also do they really make you pay for your snacks while flying? That being said your 125% over 82 hours with our green/red, dropping to zero, and 200% premium pay would be great. |
Originally Posted by Skycap876
(Post 3368645)
The difference in flexibility between Spirit and F9 is simple
At Spirit you can drop as much flying as the system will allow and never hear a word from a manager Chief pilot or the training department unless you're going to dequal. At F9, if you don't maintain at least 60 hours per month 6 months a year, and 70 hours per month 6 months per year, expect to hear from your Chief pilot. The work-life balance at Spirit is far superior. I would definitely not call that "far superior". It is better, and as an F9 I agree that we should be able to drop lower and would be interested in retaining zero in the spirit contract. |
Originally Posted by VIRotate
(Post 3368694)
Hello fellow F9'ers. Looking forward to working with y'all. Just a few questions/rumors I've heard.
Is it true that it's 50% scheduled deadhead pay? I read that in the contract comparison our union put out and my eyes almost popped out of my head. Also do they really make you pay for your snacks while flying? That being said your 125% over 82 hours with our green/red, dropping to zero, and 200% premium pay would be great. Supposed to pay for snack. 50% discount. |
Originally Posted by daOldMan
(Post 3368485)
But this will still be an ULCC. If you want a real OCC and real support, go to a legacy airline. If you want a garage sale type airline with folding tables in the OCC, go to an ULCC.
This merger will not make Sprontier a real legacy airline. It is just a larger ULCC. Period. |
Originally Posted by Cyio
(Post 3368661)
Just want to pop in and say that I am so pleased how well everyone is working together so far. If we can keep this up as a pilot group, we will be in for a big win. Together we are much better than seperated. Thankfully the differences in our current contracts are small, so this should go fairly smoothly, at least on our end. Glad to be partnering up with the F9'ers.
I'll say it anyways... For the love of all that is holy to you - do not publically state what you are willing accept. Please keep the topics simply - what you like and don't like about your carrier's contract - so that we can decide what we do and don't like and can communicate that to our respective representatives. I believe if we do that, we can most certainly have an industry leading contract. |
Originally Posted by dracir1
(Post 3368562)
the ultimate focus has GOT to be the contract and getting - what I consider - widebody rates (since we haul more passengers than legacy 75/76). With a me too. Trust me, w/ our combined CASM and increased efficiencies, they can more than afford it.
|
Originally Posted by DumboDrop
(Post 3368710)
I would definitely not call that "far superior".
It is better, and as an F9 I agree that we should be able to drop lower and would be interested in retaining zero in the spirit contract. |
Originally Posted by Chimpy
(Post 3368619)
sorry F9 guys but that is bad. Very bad, lol
Pretty sure that’s not correct. 25.m is monthly opentime language which doesn’t exist now. Unfortunately it’s true with the flica fence. Might be part of a recent clarification loa? It’s been a point of contention. Moving along. |
Originally Posted by FLYBOYMATTHEW
(Post 3368759)
So, the least amount you are allowed to fly in a year is 780 hours? Being allowed to drop to zero is FAR superior. Many at NK are hard NOs on any contract that gives up this language.
|
I think everyone can agree dropping to 0 is better and I don’t think there’s a single guy at F9 that will argue otherwise unless the new negotiated rules really screw up the reserve grid (red/green as you call it).
What we are saying is our QOL isn’t as bad as may have been led on, which is a good thing, because it is less of a gap to negotiate. Historically drop/swap have been very easy tools to use at F9. |
We haven’t even got to the hard stuff yet. Like reassignment. Lol.
|
I live far enough from base that driving for 3-4 day trips is no big deal, but driving out for 1-2 day trips would quickly suck. Are people wanting to fight to preserve the minimum 4 days off after a trip guarantee, both for itself and to prevent Sprontier from going to a day trip model?
|
Originally Posted by Aero1900
(Post 3368753)
Not to be a Debbie downer, but you realize both airlines lost money last year, right?
|
Originally Posted by Fyziksisphun
(Post 3368801)
I live far enough from base that driving for 3-4 day trips is no big deal, but driving out for 1-2 day trips would quickly suck. Are people wanting to fight to preserve the minimum 4 days off after a trip guarantee, both for itself and to prevent Sprontier from going to a day trip model?
That being said, they did do a decent job of blending the percent trips to something like 40% 1 Day, 25% 2 Day, 25% 3 Day, 10% 4 Day (generally speaking). It seemed like everyone got a little bit of what they wanted but where the commuters were most mad was how productive the day trips were in comparison to the multi-day pairings. At Frontier Average credit per day went down something like .5 hours per day of a trip. So a 1 day could be damn near 7hr credit / day versus a 4 day being something like 5.5hr credit/day. Some captains found it was better to do hotels/crash pad to make more money at work by picking up turns. This is particularly true for the newer bases at Frontier, FWIW YMMV. You can see our average trip breakdown in the “Day turns” thread under the frontier section. |
Originally Posted by sobo
(Post 3368816)
You’re going to find that the day trip model is pretty contentious. Commuters hate it, people that live far away hate it. Personally, when i lived in base I had the best QOL I could have ever hoped for and got a ton of days off per month to boot with day trips.
That being said, they did do a decent job of blending the percent trips to something like 40% 1 Day, 25% 2 Day, 25% 3 Day, 10% 4 Day (generally speaking). It seemed like everyone got a little bit of what they wanted but where the commuters were most mad was how productive the day trips were in comparison to the multi-day pairings. At Frontier Average credit per day went down something like .5 hours per day of a trip. So a 1 day could be damn near 7hr credit / day versus a 4 day being something like 5.5hr credit/day. Some captains found it was better to do hotels/crash pad to make more money at work by picking up turns. This is particularly true for the newer bases at Frontier, FWIW YMMV. You can see our average trip breakdown in the “Day turns” thread under the frontier section. |
Originally Posted by Fyziksisphun
(Post 3368832)
I was looking at that and something like 80% of the trips at the base by me are 1-2 day trips. That's what made me concerned, it would really reduce my QOL, and QOL was my reason to go to Spirit. I can see how it would be nice if you live *right* by the airport, but 1-2 hours out plus traffic (or commuting) it seems it would quickly start to suck.
|
Originally Posted by Fyziksisphun
(Post 3368832)
I was looking at that and something like 80% of the trips at the base by me are 1-2 day trips. That's what made me concerned, it would really reduce my QOL, and QOL was my reason to go to Spirit. I can see how it would be nice if you live *right* by the airport, but 1-2 hours out plus traffic (or commuting) it seems it would quickly start to suck.
You might have language that dictates required trip composition percentages? No idea but it’s common. |
Does Spirit have trip and/or duty rigs?
|
Originally Posted by Bornflying
(Post 3368875)
Does Spirit have trip and/or duty rigs?
|
Originally Posted by FNGFO
(Post 3368879)
Of course.
|
Originally Posted by Bornflying
(Post 3368875)
Does Spirit have trip and/or duty rigs?
|
Originally Posted by Bornflying
(Post 3368883)
Thanks, Spirit has both? What are the rigs?
1:3.5 trip Which I believe are better than current F9 contract rigs |
Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
(Post 3368894)
1:2 duty
1:3.5 trip Which I believe are better than current F9 contract rigs SPIRIT PILOTS’ CONTRACT COMPARISON SPIRIT AIRLINES MEC https://ravencareers.com/wp-content/...1632627896.pdf yeah F9 is "Greater of 1 for 6 or actual block hours" or 1:3.75 trip |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:29 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands