![]() |
Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
(Post 3504382)
Management and ExCargo would clearly love to throw cash at year 1 and training and be done with it, but that won’t happen.
Right now the management seems to be entirely happy to operate an airline with soon-to-be-topped-out-at-old-rates CA over 12s and guys barely off consolidation. Cinco’s screw-our-junior-brethren plan doesn’t seem to be very effective, and it is hurting our junior brethren. |
Originally Posted by Excargodog
(Post 3504566)
I’d make them pay year 1 @ $150 an hour with full insurance and 75 hr MMG starting day one of intro. That way it would actually make it more cost effective to raise everyone’s pay than to allow attrition and backfill with newbies. That’s a far more rationale (and humane) plan than just continuing to cr@p on the newbies.
Right now the management seems to be entirely happy to operate an airline with soon-to-be-topped-out-at-old-rates CA over 12s and guys barely off consolidation. Cinco’s screw-our-junior-brethren plan doesn’t seem to be very effective, and it is hurting our junior brethren. Anyone on first year understands that the gains will be worth it, if they choose to stay. If they don’t, I wish them best. |
Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
(Post 3504594)
You’re incredibly ignorant. Those horrible training rates and first year pay is the only chance we have to get gains for all.
So you repeatedly assert. Yet Alaska made gains for all, without screwing over their newbies. Anyone on first year understands that the gains will be worth it, if they choose to stay. If they don’t, I wish them best. So how long must this not work before you’ll admit you are wrong? Right now newbies are being used by management as cheap replacements for attrition. For all practical purposes, negating the leverage that attrition would otherwise give you. Threatening management with having to backfill people leaving with even cheaper replacements doesn’t seem like it’s the threat you claim it is. |
Originally Posted by MCDUmanipulator
(Post 3503950)
Sounds like company only wants to increase first year and training pay.
https://theaudiodope.files.wordpress...mer-fran1.jpeg |
Curious what people and management think is gonna happen with the influx of pilots. Y’all have bad attrition but had a well of fresh pilots to bring in but with the increases at regionals the only thing NK really has to offer is a320 type and maybe bases that might be attractive to those who currently commute. The prospect of an instant $10 raise off old rates which then doubled year two was great but with the recent huge increases the pay aspect isn’t a huge pull to regional pilots. Best case it’s a lateral move financially at this point. I don’t see spirit being as attractive and I don’t see as many people readily jumping ship to join. Begs the question with problems keeping people already and the regional pool drying up what’s company gonna do
|
Originally Posted by CLE to IAH
(Post 3504661)
|
Originally Posted by Excargodog
(Post 3504623)
So you repeatedly assert. Yet Alaska made gains for all, without screwing over their newbies.
Worth it or not worth it is not the issue. Necessary and effective is the issue, and so far no evidence whatsoever of either. So how long must this not work before you’ll admit you are wrong? Right now newbies are being used by management as cheap replacements for attrition. For all practical purposes, negating the leverage that attrition would otherwise give you. Threatening management with having to backfill people leaving with even cheaper replacements doesn’t seem like it’s the threat you claim it is. But maybe you're saying fix 1st year and not give everyone else a raise? Otherwise I don't understand the argument. Management needs to fix 1st year pay, the union says "yes, and also bring everyone else up to current market". Not hard. |
1 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by Bluedriver
(Post 3504673)
I don't think he's saying to fix everyone's pay and leave 1st year crap...
But maybe you're saying fix 1st year and not give everyone else a raise? Otherwise I don't understand the argument. Management needs to fix 1st year pay, the union says "yes, and also bring everyone else up to current market". Not hard. |
Originally Posted by Bluedriver
(Post 3504673)
I don't think he's saying to fix everyone's pay and leave 1st year crap...
But maybe you're saying fix 1st year and not give everyone else a raise? Otherwise I don't understand the argument. Management needs to fix 1st year pay, the union says "yes, and also bring everyone else up to current market". Not hard. But like CLE said, Cargo gets off on making himself the champion of the first year pay. But here is the irony, I’ll bring you up to speed. Ol Cargo used to be at Compass and he would come on the Spirit forums and chastise first year pay and proclaim how he would never come here because he can make more at Compass. One bankrupt company later, now he is here, for the same pay he swore he would never work for. However his song remains the same. The American pilots had to return him from their forums because he became an annoyance over there. |
Irony has nothing to do with it. Right now the issue is sort of one about scope. Attrition isn’t bothering management much because everybody being lost is being replaced by someone cheaper. Unless and until nobody is accepting CJOs from NK, management can tolerate the current attrition forever. Cinco continues with this argument that allowing first year guys to be. Screwed somehow gives everybody else tremendous leverage, but there is scant evidence to support that. We’ve had first year people at this ridiculous pay level since 2018 and the alleged “leverage” hasn’t worked so far.
So I ask again, Cinco, how long does this shibboleth of yours of screwing over the newbie have to not work before you admit it’s not working? |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:22 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands