![]() |
Originally Posted by ScrappyCocoa
(Post 4025914)
Yes! God I miss when the “stewardesses” were openly objectified.
/s |
Is this like when I tell my kids “I’ll think about it”
|
Originally Posted by ScrappyCocoa
(Post 4025914)
Yes! God I miss when the “stewardesses” were openly objectified.
/s We all use what we got to get ahead in life. |
Originally Posted by RiddleEagle18
(Post 4025950)
Is this like when I tell my kids “I’ll think about it”
https://www.reuters.com/business/sav...ad-2026-04-21/ |
Originally Posted by LNAVVNAVPATH
(Post 4026011)
Looks like the writing is on the wall. |
Originally Posted by LNAVVNAVPATH
(Post 4026011)
"What would someone buy?" Duffy asked. "If no one else wants to buy them, why would we buy them? "By the way if you do do *Spirit, who comes next? Who is the third?" He added: "I care about the employees at Spirit... We also have to be good stewards of the tax dollar. We can't make dumb investments, we can't put taxpayer money that is going to be lost or just forestall the inevitable." "If Spirit goes away, it's better for JetBlue," Duffy said. "If we bail out Spirit, I can't imagine that JetBlue would love that." He is correct on all points. Does it suck, yup. But spending tax dollars to bail out an airline that cant show any direction to correct course is such waste. |
Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
(Post 4026033)
"What would someone buy?" Duffy asked. "If no one else wants to buy them, why would we buy them?
"By the way if you do do *Spirit, who comes next? Who is the third?" He added: "I care about the employees at Spirit... We also have to be good stewards of the tax dollar. We can't make dumb investments, we can't put taxpayer money that is going to be lost or just forestall the inevitable." "If Spirit goes away, it's better for JetBlue," Duffy said. "If we bail out Spirit, I can't imagine that JetBlue would love that." He is correct on all points. Does it suck, yup. But spending tax dollars to bail out an airline that cant show any direction to correct course is such waste. |
Originally Posted by LNAVVNAVPATH
(Post 4026011)
|
Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
(Post 4026033)
"What would someone buy?" Duffy asked. "If no one else wants to buy them, why would we buy them?
"By the way if you do do *Spirit, who comes next? Who is the third?" He added: "I care about the employees at Spirit... We also have to be good stewards of the tax dollar. We can't make dumb investments, we can't put taxpayer money that is going to be lost or just forestall the inevitable." "If Spirit goes away, it's better for JetBlue," Duffy said. "If we bail out Spirit, I can't imagine that JetBlue would love that." He is correct on all points. Does it suck, yup. But spending tax dollars to bail out an airline that cant show any direction to correct course is such waste. |
Originally Posted by BlueJuicer17
(Post 4026123)
I guess he is right, why burden the tax payers on a product that does not generate revenue. ULCC is dead.
Don't forget, U.S. commercial aviation is the least free market, most regulated industry in this country. Government involvement isn't uncommon. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:36 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands