![]() |
Originally Posted by skigambia
(Post 4026256)
The business model was wildly successful pre-NEOs and pre-Covid and pre-Ted.
|
Originally Posted by skigambia
(Post 4026256)
The business model was wildly successful pre-NEOs and pre-Covid and pre-Ted.
|
Originally Posted by Smooth at FL450
(Post 4026264)
and most importantly, pre-basic eceonomy
|
Originally Posted by Chimpy
(Post 4026237)
|
Originally Posted by skigambia
(Post 4026256)
The business model was wildly successful pre-NEOs and pre-Covid and pre-Ted.
When you add up the cost of traveling with luggage, it was hardly low cost. You might save $20/ticket over the legacies. Which was not worth the hassle in case of delays/cancellations as Spirit didn't have the capacity/frequency/structure to reaccommodate passengers quickly. People wised up and now either travel with no luggage or they travel with someone else. Or pay an extra $20 flying basic economy with a "more reputable" brand. Lastly, have you looked at the pay of the likes of Ryan Air in Europe? It's significantly less than than their "national main brand" counterparts and they skirt labor laws with the way their bases are structured. When Spirit's labor cost creeped up, it was the last straw, it was no longer a low cost airline, just a crappy one. |
Originally Posted by mudpie
(Post 4026278)
It was wildly successful because it was arguably predatory. American consumers were either unfamiliar with the unbundling concept or the market segment was too stupid to pay attention. That's why ancillary fees were a majority percentage of the revenue.
When you add up the cost of traveling with luggage, it was hardly low cost. You might save $20/ticket over the legacies. Which was not worth the hassle in case of delays/cancellations as Spirit didn't have the capacity/frequency/structure to reaccommodate passengers quickly. People wised up and now either travel with no luggage or they travel with someone else. Or pay an extra $20 flying basic economy with a "more reputable" brand. Lastly, have you looked at the pay of the likes of Ryan Air in Europe? It's significantly less than than their "national main brand" counterparts and they skirt labor laws with the way their bases are structured. When Spirit's labor cost creeped up, it was the last straw, it was no longer a low cost airline, just a crappy one. |
Originally Posted by flier320
(Post 4026269)
In line with the rest of his STUPID decisions lately. But it will buy the company another 6 months. Whoptie do
|
Originally Posted by skigambia
(Post 4026282)
Why does Sun Country have such large margins?
Also their labor rate is noticeably less than legacy sized airline. My family actually flies Allegiant quite a bit even though at times it costs more than a legacy. It allows direct flights to vacation spots out of my non major hub city. |
Originally Posted by Chimpy
(Post 4026237)
|
Originally Posted by Stankhunt42
(Post 4026295)
Great now the taxpayer has to dump more money on the fire. What a waste.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:13 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands