Spirit Airlines current hiring
#443
New Hire
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
I'm gonna chime in , don't give up transition. There's a reason that a small portion of our schedules have more than min days off ( even rsv) . Think about it if they could , (just like every airline out there) build a schedule it would like this for us
xxxxooooxxxxooooxxxxooooxxxx
That's 12 days off with 4 days off between every trip . Now if they did that to all our lines we would all get 16 days off due to conflicts .
So if you even consider giving up conflict , give it up for min days off of 16 period . I PERSONALLY WILL GIVE UP NOTHING fyi!
Someone mention earlier that it's hard to conflict . Totally BS ! You bid ,then you pick up or trade into the conflict before you bid next months . Plain and simple . Red /green helped us out (especially the FO side) to easily manipulate our schedule .
Just my .02
xxxxooooxxxxooooxxxxooooxxxx
That's 12 days off with 4 days off between every trip . Now if they did that to all our lines we would all get 16 days off due to conflicts .
So if you even consider giving up conflict , give it up for min days off of 16 period . I PERSONALLY WILL GIVE UP NOTHING fyi!
Someone mention earlier that it's hard to conflict . Totally BS ! You bid ,then you pick up or trade into the conflict before you bid next months . Plain and simple . Red /green helped us out (especially the FO side) to easily manipulate our schedule .
Just my .02
#444
Great. We're ****ed. Because of your "principles" I guess I'll have to tell my wife and kids goodbye for an additional 5-6 days a month when I usually get a conflict. Bendo will be loving every line he reads if this kind of thing ever makes it to his desk. By bidding transition conflicts I'm doing absolutely nothing outside of the confines of my CBA and I certainly don't feel like my "principles" are compromised; I'm just working within the rules both sides gave me.
But you're telling me you'll give it away just so you don't feel "bad" about it and you want to work for every penny you earn? Tell me, how does that work out for you when you get paid 4 hours a day for an 8 hour day of recurrent? Or when you sit around a hotel for virtually free (due to trip averaging) away from your family?
***Note: I changed and highlighted your "more money" to reflect more "time off" so I'm not labeled an "overtime wh@re", thereby a threat to myself and others ***
But you're telling me you'll give it away just so you don't feel "bad" about it and you want to work for every penny you earn? Tell me, how does that work out for you when you get paid 4 hours a day for an 8 hour day of recurrent? Or when you sit around a hotel for virtually free (due to trip averaging) away from your family?
***Note: I changed and highlighted your "more money" to reflect more "time off" so I'm not labeled an "overtime wh@re", thereby a threat to myself and others ***
Now, moving forward... What is the conflict language worth? If you get 5 days off in transition and end up with a 21 day off line that pays you $10k for the month. What difference would it be if you were able to just flat out drop that trip and still have 21 days off and still make $10k for the month? Point is: you CAN put a $ amount on the conflict language, and if ALPA chooses to trade it away I will listen to what the company has to offer in return.
#445
Ramrod: You know the pilots are not going to allow PBS, so how would you like to handle transition. If you happen to bid of days off and results in you working 6 days and losing credit for the parts you can't fly would you be cool with that? My guess is you would be happy to accept the current conflict language conflict. Soft time is a reality in the industry, and you are not doing anything wrong by abiding by the contract that company had agreed on. If you don't want to go after it no worries, but I don't see it going away.
How would I handle the transition? Pay me enough on my hourly rate to offset lost credit in transition-plus a raise. Then I'd be cool with it. Maybe take those who bid conflicts and give them priority in IOT..? I'm not sure how other airlines who bid regular schedules do it..
Would I be happy to accept the current conflict language? Yes.
The problem I have with it is this: There is already a large disparity in pay as you move up in longevity based on hourly rates. The very senior are able to bid conflicts AND get the days off they want. Then pick up over their dropped trip and make even more resulting in an even larger gap in earnings. Then you have the people in the middle of the seniority list who can get a conflict most months but don't because they need certain days off and don't want to take the risk in IOT or DOT and end up having to work on their anniversary or kids birthday. I choose most months to get the guaranteed days off in my monthly bid. Then there are those at the bottom who have trouble getting either one of the above scenarios. I feel that, for most, the language is somewhat restrictive unless you are at the top of the seniority list. For the record: I think your schedules and pay should get better with seniority.
I have been in this industry for long enough to know that soft time is a reality. I'd like to see increased rigs on top of it. At least that will force the company to make more productive schedules.
I agree we are not doing anything wrong by abiding by the contract. See my post above.
I'm not sure if transition conflict will go away. What I am sure of, is that if it does, it had better be for something better for the group as a whole.
#446
Line Holder
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
From: A-320 Captain
#447
Line Holder
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 683
Likes: 30
Exactly it's better to get guaranteed money over hoping to work language in your favor every month. And I know joey's example was just for illustration but a more accurate representation would be is better to make $190/hr at 72 hrs (3 yr captain) than try to work language to make 108hrs of credit at $126/hr.
I'm not advocating giving up any language. For what? There is no reason to. The market dictates big raises with zero give backs. It's not 2010. Always take guaranteed money over maybe money that you have to strategicly bid for and sacrifice other parts of your month to get and only a small percentage of the group actually achieves. That's just common sense. The other way would be like taking profit sharing over a 16% retirement contribution. Just stupid.
I'm not advocating giving up any language. For what? There is no reason to. The market dictates big raises with zero give backs. It's not 2010. Always take guaranteed money over maybe money that you have to strategicly bid for and sacrifice other parts of your month to get and only a small percentage of the group actually achieves. That's just common sense. The other way would be like taking profit sharing over a 16% retirement contribution. Just stupid.
How about keep what we have annnnnd request guarantee money?
#448
Banned
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,929
Likes: 0
From: A-320
I'm gonna chime in , don't give up transition. There's a reason that a small portion of our schedules have more than min days off ( even rsv) . Think about it if they could , (just like every airline out there) build a schedule it would like this for us
xxxxooooxxxxooooxxxxooooxxxx
That's 12 days off with 4 days off between every trip . Now if they did that to all our lines we would all get 16 days off due to conflicts .
So if you even consider giving up conflict , give it up for min days off of 16 period . I PERSONALLY WILL GIVE UP NOTHING fyi!
Someone mention earlier that it's hard to conflict . Totally BS ! You bid ,then you pick up or trade into the conflict before you bid next months . Plain and simple . Red /green helped us out (especially the FO side) to easily manipulate our schedule .
Just my .02
xxxxooooxxxxooooxxxxooooxxxx
That's 12 days off with 4 days off between every trip . Now if they did that to all our lines we would all get 16 days off due to conflicts .
So if you even consider giving up conflict , give it up for min days off of 16 period . I PERSONALLY WILL GIVE UP NOTHING fyi!
Someone mention earlier that it's hard to conflict . Totally BS ! You bid ,then you pick up or trade into the conflict before you bid next months . Plain and simple . Red /green helped us out (especially the FO side) to easily manipulate our schedule .
Just my .02
#449
New Hire
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
DFW had maybe 10 trips in IOT , and 30+ after. Of course I was already close to having a conflict , I just filled in the gaps . I'm just saying you can be junior and conflict rather easy. Might require bidding RSV but if you want lots time off its a nice option ...
#450
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
I don't know who these guys are who are able to credit over 100 hours on a consistent basis but I can tell you I've certainly never met any in person. As a commuter, it is nearly impossible to credit anything over 85 hours unless you are willing to completely sacrifice your personal life. I have been here for 18 months and have yet to credit more than 90 hours in a month while typically crediting between 72 and 80 hours.
Yes, I've heard stories of guys that live in base and sit on the phone with crew scheduling 24/7 crediting an egregious amount of hours but this is certainly not the norm (and also not really helping out the rest of the pilot group but that's another argument). It's also not the way I hope most of us want to live our lives in order to make what United and Delta A320 pilots are making.
The point is, although transition conflict and some of our other work rules are nice, they need to be supplemented with more important things such as a stronger trip rig (at least 5.25 hours per calendar day) and industry standard A320 pay. Without those two things, we will all be spending the rest of our careers sitting on the phone with crew scheduling begging for open time at straight pay and taking ourselves down to 4 days off per month just to make what are brothers and sisters at United and Delta are making.
Don't get me wrong. I love it here and really would like to make a career of Spirit. We have some great work rules. We also have some severe deficiencies (pay, trip rigs and retirement) and I think some guys like to try to justify those deficiencies with things such as the transition conflict. The transition conflict is great and I think we should keep it, but we shouldn't have to count on it every single month in order to credit 120 hours so that we can make the same amount as our A320 peers who only need to credit 80 hours per month to make the same amount of money. In my 18 months here, I've experiences a whopping 3 transition conflicts, 2 of them on RSV which if you actually follow the contract, you'll know that you cannot pick up open time in order to credit above guarantee.
If we are going to make some gains in the next contract, we need to quit living in fantasy land and admit that we have some serious deficiencies. Yes, Spirit is a great place to work and we have some good work rules but seriously guys, let's be real. We have some work to do.
Yes, I've heard stories of guys that live in base and sit on the phone with crew scheduling 24/7 crediting an egregious amount of hours but this is certainly not the norm (and also not really helping out the rest of the pilot group but that's another argument). It's also not the way I hope most of us want to live our lives in order to make what United and Delta A320 pilots are making.
The point is, although transition conflict and some of our other work rules are nice, they need to be supplemented with more important things such as a stronger trip rig (at least 5.25 hours per calendar day) and industry standard A320 pay. Without those two things, we will all be spending the rest of our careers sitting on the phone with crew scheduling begging for open time at straight pay and taking ourselves down to 4 days off per month just to make what are brothers and sisters at United and Delta are making.
Don't get me wrong. I love it here and really would like to make a career of Spirit. We have some great work rules. We also have some severe deficiencies (pay, trip rigs and retirement) and I think some guys like to try to justify those deficiencies with things such as the transition conflict. The transition conflict is great and I think we should keep it, but we shouldn't have to count on it every single month in order to credit 120 hours so that we can make the same amount as our A320 peers who only need to credit 80 hours per month to make the same amount of money. In my 18 months here, I've experiences a whopping 3 transition conflicts, 2 of them on RSV which if you actually follow the contract, you'll know that you cannot pick up open time in order to credit above guarantee.
If we are going to make some gains in the next contract, we need to quit living in fantasy land and admit that we have some serious deficiencies. Yes, Spirit is a great place to work and we have some good work rules but seriously guys, let's be real. We have some work to do.
Last edited by WelcomeToBen; 10-08-2014 at 03:01 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



