Notices

Spirit of NKS, Part II

Old 08-12-2016 | 06:03 PM
  #7981  
Judge Smails's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 933
Likes: 207
From: A320
Default

Originally Posted by flensr
I can see keeping A319s on order for smaller markets, but I'm having a lot of trouble wrapping my brain around turning Spirit from a LCC to an oversized regional. Competing with every single existing regional out there on price alone just doesn't seem to be a plan for success. What, we're gonna run skywest (or whatever regional you want to compare with) out of business because we have the A320 CASM thing wired? I just don't get it. Entering a market already saturated with struggling companies is a good way to go broke unless you're willing to take big losses while running everyone else out of money *cough*walmart*cough*. I don't think spirit is the next walmart.
Do you understand how the whole regional, fee for departure thing works? Skywest, or any other regional for that matter, doesn't sell its own tickets. They get paid only by the mainline carrier(s) they have contracts with, and their profitability is based on the quality of those contracts. Where they fly to and from doesn't affect their bottom line.
Old 08-12-2016 | 06:31 PM
  #7982  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,364
Likes: 145
Default

Originally Posted by Judge Smails
Do you understand how the whole regional, fee for departure thing works? Skywest, or any other regional for that matter, doesn't sell its own tickets. They get paid only by the mainline carrier(s) they have contracts with, and their profitability is based on the quality of those contracts. Where they fly to and from doesn't affect their bottom line.
I still don't think Spirit is going to displace those regardless, because I'm not convinced Spirit can fly a c-series cheaply enough to displace everyone else servicing those markets. The regionals have been flying small planes on small profit margins for quite a while so trying to out-small the smaller operators doesn't seem to be an attractive business strategy no matter who's selling the tickets. Just because Spirit is super-efficient with the A320 doesn't make me assume that they'll be so efficient with a smaller plane that they can create a new market at the low end or displace existing smaller plane operators.

Spirit lists their payscale and "juniority" as a CASM "tailwind" in their investor presentation. How much below regional payscales do they think they can go, and are they planning on flying them with crews somehow "more junior" than other small operators, to maintain that CASM competitive advantage? I don't see maneuvering airspace down on that end of the costs equation, so where's the compelling business advantage to justify adding an airframe type to either open up a new market or capture an existing one?

Of course, my MBA was mail order so I'm probably full of crap. I just don't see the business model where it makes sense for spirit to buy a new type of smaller planes, thats all. I could be wrong, I'm totally the new guy, and this is just bar talk for discussion...
Old 08-12-2016 | 07:07 PM
  #7983  
captlonestar's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by flensr
I still don't think Spirit is going to displace those regardless, because I'm not convinced Spirit can fly a c-series cheaply enough to displace everyone else servicing those markets. The regionals have been flying small planes on small profit margins for quite a while so trying to out-small the smaller operators doesn't seem to be an attractive business strategy no matter who's selling the tickets. Just because Spirit is super-efficient with the A320 doesn't make me assume that they'll be so efficient with a smaller plane that they can create a new market at the low end or displace existing smaller plane operators.

Spirit lists their payscale and "juniority" as a CASM "tailwind" in their investor presentation. How much below regional payscales do they think they can go, and are they planning on flying them with crews somehow "more junior" than other small operators, to maintain that CASM competitive advantage? I don't see maneuvering airspace down on that end of the costs equation, so where's the compelling business advantage to justify adding an airframe type to either open up a new market or capture an existing one?

Of course, my MBA was mail order so I'm probably full of crap. I just don't see the business model where it makes sense for spirit to buy a new type of smaller planes, thats all. I could be wrong, I'm totally the new guy, and this is just bar talk for discussion...
Man just stick to flying. This stuff is way above your pay grade.

It's better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than open it and remove all doubt - Mark Twain
Old 08-12-2016 | 07:18 PM
  #7984  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,385
Likes: 0
From: Airplane
Default

Originally Posted by captlonestar
Man just stick to flying. This stuff is way above your pay grade.

It's better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than open it and remove all doubt - Mark Twain
Sometimes it's just fun to speculate and play CEO. No harm in it.

One thing to keep in mind, as we start have an AirTran-like revival in the near future, they ran with a two type operation and did quite well at it. People return to what worked for them in the past, what they're familiar with and good at. It wouldn't surprise me if Mr. Fornaro convinced the Board that it worked at AirTran, it can work here at Spirit. Not saying it's right, not saying it's wrong, or even this is in the plan, but it wouldn't surprise me.

With fuel prices being so low, it doesn't make sense to me, but who knows, I'm just a dumb pilot who's Master's Degree was from mail order too.
Old 08-12-2016 | 07:34 PM
  #7985  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
Default

Fume event MCO. News all over it. NK says it was bad freon in the packs. Are you f'n kidding me?!?!
Old 08-12-2016 | 07:56 PM
  #7986  
Tranquility's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 1,690
Likes: 20
From: 60’s Tech, Right
Default

Dammit, the jig is up; that freon is a crucial ingredient in mixing chemtrails.... Damn our spokesman for outing us!
Old 08-12-2016 | 11:12 PM
  #7987  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,603
Likes: 0
Default

I couldn't give two shoots where we fly as long as we are compensated properly.

Small markets are actually very lucrative. Regional airlines don't make money because the mainline "partner" keeps all the profits and pays the regional a set rate per hour no matter where they go or how many folks are on the plane.

Try buying a ticket from BFE to BFE. It's super expensive. It's just a matter of identifying which markets can be connected point to point and fill a jet. Allegiant does it and it's the southwest bread and butter. People love not having to connect in a hub city

That said, where the fukc is my quid and my RATIFIABLE contract?!
Old 08-13-2016 | 01:43 AM
  #7988  
gonyon's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,499
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by flensr
I still don't think Spirit is going to displace those regardless, because I'm not convinced Spirit can fly a c-series cheaply enough to displace everyone else servicing those markets. The regionals have been flying small planes on small profit margins for quite a while so trying to out-small the smaller operators doesn't seem to be an attractive business strategy no matter who's selling the tickets. Just because Spirit is super-efficient with the A320 doesn't make me assume that they'll be so efficient with a smaller plane that they can create a new market at the low end or displace existing smaller plane operators.



Spirit lists their payscale and "juniority" as a CASM "tailwind" in their investor presentation. How much below regional payscales do they think they can go, and are they planning on flying them with crews somehow "more junior" than other small operators, to maintain that CASM competitive advantage? I don't see maneuvering airspace down on that end of the costs equation, so where's the compelling business advantage to justify adding an airframe type to either open up a new market or capture an existing one?



Of course, my MBA was mail order so I'm probably full of crap. I just don't see the business model where it makes sense for spirit to buy a new type of smaller planes, thats all. I could be wrong, I'm totally the new guy, and this is just bar talk for discussion...


Those routes aren't profitable on their own for the regionals or the mainline that subsidizes them. They recoup the losses on the connections. So homey flies Dayton to philly to Miami.
They make the money over the entire leg but if divided up by segment they lose on the regional leg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Old 08-13-2016 | 04:36 AM
  #7989  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 487
Likes: 24
Default

Although I prefer to not see a new plane on property..
And
Personally
Don't want to or plan to leave the bus... I think if it's a too good of a deal they might decide to go that route. Airbus is pretty back logged with orders. Could they deliver another 100 in next 8 years? Maybe but just take a look at their outstanding orders. Maybe not.
Bombardier has one big suitor (delta). My guess is bombardier would basically seel them to us at
Cost along with some free sim time and maintenance parts for a period of time to get the publicity and ink another large order. Not to mention they can deliver them much quicker. (Assuming). Bringing another type on property would have headaches but if the cost benefit analysis shows that they are 1/3 the price of the Airbus I think they would seriously consider it... And they prolly have
Old 08-13-2016 | 06:11 AM
  #7990  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 388
Likes: 9
From: A320 CA
Default

Originally Posted by Lobaeux
Sometimes it's just fun to speculate and play CEO. No harm in it.
No real benefit either.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
De La Ghetto
Flight Schools and Training
22
11-26-2014 05:41 PM
dl773
Flight Schools and Training
2
06-17-2014 03:03 PM
emj55
Major
8
06-04-2008 03:58 AM
downinthegroove
Regional
2
06-03-2008 05:55 PM
N618FT
Regional
34
11-19-2007 07:28 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices