View Poll Results: T/A Vote Yes or No
Yes
50
9.38%
No
483
90.62%
Voters: 533. You may not vote on this poll
Yes or No
06-24-2022, 06:07 PM
#11
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: DOWNGRADE COMPLETE: Thanks Gary. Thanks SWAPA.
Posts: 6,605
Originally Posted by AntiPeter
I’m sure you are a yes vote, but if your mind is open consider the accuracy of the analysis and predictions by ALPA E&FA in the past.
Economic predictions are horribly inaccurate. They do not have a good track record.
I personally think you are trying to find reasons to vote yes, which is what most yes voters will need to do because this TA is terrible. But, yes voters will always find a reason to vote yes…and that reason is usually fear.
Economic predictions are horribly inaccurate. They do not have a good track record.
I personally think you are trying to find reasons to vote yes, which is what most yes voters will need to do because this TA is terrible. But, yes voters will always find a reason to vote yes…and that reason is usually fear.
06-24-2022, 06:13 PM
#12
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2011
Position: Hoping for any position
Posts: 2,504
Originally Posted by awax
0600 reserve call out assures that commuters are forced to spend a previous day off to commute in.
That alone is worth flushing this turd.
it’s NOT a money contract and it’s not a work rules contract.
That alone is worth flushing this turd.
it’s NOT a money contract and it’s not a work rules contract.
06-24-2022, 06:19 PM
#13
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2019
Posts: 432
Originally Posted by fishforfun
And the fact it eliminates all of those trips that would be covered by premium are gone. It’s a double whammy.
06-24-2022, 06:31 PM
#16
Banned
Joined APC: Feb 2022
Position: Power Isosceles
Posts: 119
A 4% raise initially with retro only back 6 months is laughable. Reserve rules haven’t really changed for the better, they’re just throwing some $$$ at the problem. The FIFO system needs to go along with the FSB. Reserve should be seniority based like everything else. Untriggered reassignment pay is gone, first day of reserve is now 6am, and a weight increase for the turd they call a 550 IS a scope give. We can do much better.
06-24-2022, 07:08 PM
#17
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 757/767 First Officer
Posts: 364
Originally Posted by friendlypilot
the 5% isn’t guaranteed to happen unless certain financial conditions happen, which we aren’t even close to it yet. If they don’t happen, we don’t get it. With this ta we get it.
I think i’ll wait for the alpa financial and economic advisors to talk about the state of the industry etc before being sure to cast my vote.
I think i’ll wait for the alpa financial and economic advisors to talk about the state of the industry etc before being sure to cast my vote.
hurry up and vote yes before the 2nd quarter earnings report!!!
06-24-2022, 07:10 PM
#18
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,192
Originally Posted by WHACKMASTER;[url=tel:3447577
3447577[/url]]You’re wasting your keystrokes on that guy. He’s a lost cause.
He’ll be the first one to ***** about it too once he actually has to live under the sections he didn’t read.
06-24-2022, 09:10 PM
#20
Banned
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 309
Please don’t just look at Section 3! Yes, we’ll be getting a small increase in pay but the rest of the TA is filled with CONCESSIONS. Why are you willing to take a few extra dollars while giving up so much? Send it back, get the 5% from the LOA and see how bad Kirby wants to right then TK ship.
The mantra about the economy, time value of money, etc makes sense only if we were not giving up so much.
The mantra about the economy, time value of money, etc makes sense only if we were not giving up so much.
