Search

Notices

Iad 777/787

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-08-2017 | 04:08 AM
  #21  
dmeg13021's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 927
Likes: 110
Default

Base, Equipment, Seat
Reply
Old 04-08-2017 | 05:20 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by fireman0174
BES stands for what? [retired guy]
Domicile.
Reply
Old 04-08-2017 | 06:54 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 456
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by pilotgolfer
Kirby's first move will be to require Business Class passengers to fill out the Form 0-96 after each meal.
Lol, who's required to bring smokers to board meetings?
Reply
Old 04-08-2017 | 09:02 AM
  #24  
pilotgolfer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,982
Likes: 0
From: A320 Captain
Default

Can anybody take a stab at what the timeline might look like for the DCA pilots? Most of my vacation weeks are late fall / early winter and I'm wondering if I should try to trade out of them vs. losing them due to training conflicts.

I'm guessing it's too early to make an educated guess.
Reply
Old 04-08-2017 | 09:59 AM
  #25  
oldmako's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 3,076
Likes: 3
From: The GF of FUPM
Default

Originally Posted by Probe
787 to IAD looks like a non-event. Same flying, slightly different mix of aircraft. It will be staffed with mostly the same pilots. As long as Manpower doesn't screw the pooch too bad on the transition, no big deal.
Closing the IAH 787 is a bit expensive, but so was a bunch of non-productive trips after LOS went away. Some flying will leave the base as they were doing international trips out of other bases. IAH is still a huge base, with other opportunities for most of the bumped pilots.

Even closing the SFO 400 base doesn't change much. All the flying is still there, on aircraft that pay the same. The new airframes will be much more reliable. Still sad I never bid it.

Other than losing some spots in IAH, really kind of a wash, unless Manpower screws up. Or more likely, changes their mind halfway through the process.

My money is on the latter.
Probe,

I'm not sure how you conclude this will be a non event. I think it's going to cause significant upheaval. Certainly for the IAH guys getting bumped, and everyone junior to them who will be affected as things are pushed downward. (Line-holder to reserve? Nah. ) I don't know how big the 787 base is in IAH, if its tiny that will certainly minimize the hassle.

My guess is a big chunk of them will simply bump to other equipment in IAH as opposed to commuting to IAD. Then what about the 777 peeps in IAD? Why would a 63 year old Capt want to go to school on the 787 for the same pay? Other than the guys who love training and type ratings, I can see a lot of guys trying to avoid the hassle. What are they going to do? We won't know till they come up with the flying for the 777. The FO list on the 777 in DC is pretty big and if they start squashing things on it (pushing more flying to the 787) there will be a lot of sideways movement.

I think this has the potential to be a pretty big deal for the guys on both fleets in both cities.
Reply
Old 04-08-2017 | 10:25 AM
  #26  
cadetdrivr's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,639
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by oldmako
Probe,

I'm not sure how you conclude this will be a non event. I think it's going to cause significant upheaval. Certainly for the IAH guys getting bumped, and everyone junior to them who will be affected as things are pushed downward. (Line-holder to reserve? Nah. ) I don't know how big the 787 base is in IAH, if its tiny that will certainly minimize the hassle.

My guess is a big chunk of them will simply bump to other equipment in IAH as opposed to commuting to IAD. Then what about the 777 peeps in IAD? Why would a 63 year old Capt want to go to school on the 787 for the same pay? Other than the guys who love training and type ratings, I can see a lot of guys trying to avoid the hassle. What are they going to do? We won't know till they come up with the flying for the 777. The FO list on the 777 in DC is pretty big and if they start squashing things on it (pushing more flying to the 787) there will be a lot of sideways movement.

I think this has the potential to be a pretty big deal for the guys on both fleets in both cities.
I think this whole thing will result in lots of sideways movement. It's not like UA is dropping any routes or downsizing the widebody fleet.

The same bases will be flying the same city pairs, just in different equipment.

Considering that the 777-to-787 training footprint is pretty small I'm gonna suspect this is less of an event for IAD. The folks in IAH who will take it up the backside are the ones who will be losing 787 pay for 756 pay.

We'll see.....
Reply
Old 04-08-2017 | 12:10 PM
  #27  
UCH Pilot
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 776
Likes: 1
From: 787
Default

Originally Posted by cadetdrivr
The folks in IAH who will take it up the backside are the ones who will be losing 787 pay for 756 pay.
Yes. IAH 787 was flying DEN-NRT and IAD-CDG and that flying is gone and it was a lot of flying adding in the flights to and from IAH.
Reply
Old 04-08-2017 | 12:12 PM
  #28  
UCH Pilot
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 776
Likes: 1
From: 787
Default

Originally Posted by cadetdrivr
The same bases will be flying the same city pairs, just in different equipment.
Except 787 IAH which loses DEN-NRT and IAD-CDG. I wonder which base will get DEN-NRT?
Reply
Old 04-08-2017 | 01:12 PM
  #29  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 740
Likes: 19
Default

Originally Posted by svergin
Except 787 IAH which loses DEN-NRT and IAD-CDG. I wonder which base will get DEN-NRT?
Hopefully DEN lol!
Reply
Old 04-08-2017 | 06:35 PM
  #30  
Don't say Guppy
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 0
From: Guppy driver
Default

Originally Posted by svergin
Yes. IAH 787 was flying DEN-NRT and IAD-CDG and that flying is gone and it was a lot of flying adding in the flights to and from IAH.
And those trips were fairly inefficient trips for a wide body fleet.

Sorry James, the fact that a 63 year old doesn't WANT to go to training for a week and a half for a similar flying experience is not my problem. It is simply part of the job sometimes. The route is the same. The pay is the same. The flying experience is the same except I heard the cockpit in Sparky is quieter.

IAH can absorb most of the 170 affected pilots getting bumped off Sparky. Some commute, and will probably choose to commute to a different base so the number is even less.

Same pilots, same routes, same pay. Non-event.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ugleeual
United
4
06-21-2016 08:47 AM
jsfBoat
Your Photos and Videos
1
05-31-2013 07:25 AM
fdxdispatchguy
Cargo
14
12-08-2012 01:23 PM
Paws
Regional
32
10-28-2009 04:41 PM
4th Level
Major
7
04-05-2006 07:12 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices