Search

Notices

CFI to UAL CPP

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-20-2018, 08:00 AM
  #261  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,159
Default

Originally Posted by Itsajob
I If not flying here after completing our training program this person would be at a regional taking United passengers into a shorter runway in the same weather, in a jet, with the same small margin for error. The captain on that flight may or may not have the experience level of those who have been flying as long as a mainline captain. There are plenty of high time applicants out there and we should be hiring them, but I don’t think that a low time pilot has a greater chance of making the news here than somewhere else.

1. The less amount of flight time you have the less experience you have.

2. The less experience you have to base decisions off of, the less judgment you have to bring to bear.

3. The less judgment you have in aeronautical decision making the more you have to rely on other things to guide your process.

4. The United training footprint doesn't substitute for reduced experience and judgement.


5. Aeronautical decision making is a product of, and a sum of; training, experience, and judgement.


6. A pilot can't spend 6 weeks in training and all of a sudden jump out of the phone booth with all the tools he/or she needs to necessarily be all that he or she needs to be. The training footprint is designed for efficiency and cost effectiveness and to cover what needs to be covered in the "time allotted."

7. There isn't enough "OE" to go around for inexperienced new hire pilots to cover a years worth of complex operations in 2 or 3 line trips with a check airman babysitting you.

8. The low time pilot does have a higher instance. If you were to ask an FAA inspector at what some of the institutional markers are that they use to justify increased surveillance or observation one of them is turnover and/or allot of inexperience on the flight deck.

9. A pilot gets his/her seasoning and experience however they can get it. Like all persons pursing advancement in a profession the goal is to spend the least amount of time possible working for peanuts so that they can spend the bulk of their time maximizing the return on their investment (training, education). It's no secret a pilot would like to spend zero time at the regionals if they could. But, since the industry doesn't pay well enough at the regionals and since the same industry killed career progression after 9-11 it is what it is.

10. The profession needs to rebound for a sustained period of time in order for the experience factor to get back to acceptable norms for new hires entering the profession. I see no valid reason to pass on highly experienced candidates and hire a new CFI instead of a 10,000 hour RJ pilot. We need to try and force that new CFI to get invested in the profession and get that experience we all want him or her to have before getting hired by a major.
baseball is offline  
Old 08-20-2018, 08:04 AM
  #262  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 705
Default

I'm sure they are fine people, have the book answers down pat and can fly a beautiful ILS. My question is how are they operating in an extremely busy terminal environment with WX/last minute runway changes, doing the RV19 DCA/Expressway 31 LGA at night with 25kts of wind out of the West? Do they have enough experience to tell a weak captain no or be an asset to the Captain when the cockpit is extremely busy?


..... Beat me to it baseball
Floyd is offline  
Old 08-20-2018, 08:14 AM
  #263  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,159
Default

Originally Posted by Floyd
I'm sure they are fine people, have the book answers down pat and can fly a beautiful ILS. My question is how are they operating in an extremely busy terminal environment with WX/last minute runway changes, doing the RV19 DCA/Expressway 31 LGA at night with 25kts of wind out of the West? Do they have enough experience to tell a weak captain no or be an asset to the Captain when the cockpit is extremely busy?


..... Beat me to it baseball
They don't. Why? Because they can't tell a low time or even a high time Captain anything, because they don't know anything, and more importantly, even if they did, they wouldn't know how to articulate it in a meaningful way. You need more than 3 stripes and an Ipad to be an effective co pilot. If the Captain knows you know nothing, likely you are already blown off and your opinions not highly considered. But, knowing how to say it, is a "learned technique." You don't just pop out of the womb doing advanced calculus, and you don't just pop of the TK super pilot phone booth with being a jedi master in CRM. You need experience to "back up" the great training UAL gave you when you were hired. It's experience plus training that gives you the judgment. It's also that combination that gives you credibility.
baseball is offline  
Old 08-20-2018, 01:39 PM
  #264  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Posts: 294
Default

Originally Posted by Broncofan
Went through training with 2. Both rocked it. Talked to them afterward and they are doing just fine after IOE.
I flew with 2 LCAs and PI all told me their book skills were fine but their flying skills/judgment were very subpar compared to the normal mil/civ new hire. All needed more sims or more paired LCA flying before getting through training. Hiring people without turbine time in the current environment is completely ridiculous.

One of the LCAs also told me that the current head of LCA program has a kid enrolled in this program, and that is why this nothing but CFI program was able to get a CPP with UAL set up.
UALfoLIFE is offline  
Old 08-20-2018, 01:58 PM
  #265  
Need More Callouts
 
757Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: Unbridled Enthusiasm
Posts: 2,143
Default

Originally Posted by UALfoLIFE
I flew with 2 LCAs and PI all told me their book skills were fine but their flying skills/judgment were very subpar compared to the normal mil/civ new hire. All needed more sims or more paired LCA flying before getting through training. Hiring people without turbine time in the current environment is completely ridiculous.

One of the LCAs also told me that the current head of LCA program has a kid enrolled in this program, and that is why this nothing but CFI program was able to get a CPP with UAL set up.
Good thing they'll pay us Captains extra to train these guys and gals out on the line, NOT !!
757Driver is offline  
Old 08-20-2018, 05:29 PM
  #266  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,159
Default

Originally Posted by 757Driver
Good thing they'll pay us Captains extra to train these guys and gals out on the line, NOT !!
Just call the FODM and politely tell them you aren't a baby-sitter. Find another copilot who is ready for prime time.
baseball is offline  
Old 08-20-2018, 05:31 PM
  #267  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,159
Default

Originally Posted by UALfoLIFE
One of the LCAs also told me that the current head of LCA program has a kid enrolled in this program, and that is why this nothing but CFI program was able to get a CPP with UAL set up.
Was it the head of the overall LCA program, or just a particular LCA on a particular fleet type? I would like to see our union look into this particular issue if the facts back up what you stated. It sort of reminds me of how Fred Abbot operated with his "pfriends of pfred" program. Just get done what he wants done via his relationships....
baseball is offline  
Old 08-20-2018, 07:47 PM
  #268  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Posts: 728
Default

Originally Posted by UALfoLIFE
I flew with 2 LCAs and PI all told me their book skills were fine but their flying skills/judgment were very subpar compared to the normal mil/civ new hire. All needed more sims or more paired LCA flying before getting through training. Hiring people without turbine time in the current environment is completely ridiculous.

One of the LCAs also told me that the current head of LCA program has a kid enrolled in this program, and that is why this nothing but CFI program was able to get a CPP with UAL set up.
Well I can personally tell you the extra sims is bull **** for the 2 I went through training with. Absolutely no extra sims. And they were the first ones to go through about 3 months ago. As far as operating in high workload environments? I cant say for sure, but everyone including mil guys have a hard time with that at first
Broncofan is offline  
Old 08-21-2018, 04:00 AM
  #269  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 459
Default

Originally Posted by baseball

10. The profession needs to rebound for a sustained period of time in order for the experience factor to get back to acceptable norms for new hires entering the profession. I see no valid reason to pass on highly experienced candidates and hire a new CFI instead of a 10,000 hour RJ pilot. We need to try and force that new CFI to get invested in the profession and get that experience we all want him or her to have before getting hired by a major.


Excellent points but I can tell you why they are doing this. It’s not to pass up the 10,000hr RJ pilot. Everyone knows he’s going to be better than a CFI. This is an experiment to see if hiring from basically zero time will be viable in the future should the regional applicant pool dry up.
Spicy McHaggis is offline  
Old 08-21-2018, 04:02 AM
  #270  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 459
Default

Originally Posted by Broncofan
Well I can personally tell you the extra sims is bull **** for the 2 I went through training with. Absolutely no extra sims. And they were the first ones to go through about 3 months ago. As far as operating in high workload environments? I cant say for sure, but everyone including mil guys have a hard time with that at first


What pilot from a regional has issues with flying in “high workload environments?” Almost all of them have been flying in and out of the busiest airports in the country for years.
Spicy McHaggis is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ReserveDog
United
46
05-23-2014 07:23 AM
Airhoss
United
210
09-04-2012 06:48 AM
TruthHurts
United
48
04-04-2012 09:07 AM
cons
Flight Schools and Training
8
03-27-2007 07:09 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices