Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   United (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/united/)
-   -   Section 6 Opening Letters (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/united/111877-section-6-opening-letters.html)

Airhoss 03-04-2018 07:49 PM


Originally Posted by baseball (Post 2543037)
I don't think TK is that easy of a target.

I am not an instructor, nor do I aspire to be, but I must say, I enjoy the experience there, and I feel it adds much value and safety to our product and the profession. I think our pilots would fight for TK and the instructor cadre. I will.

Another thing, by outsourcing instruction to retired pilots please keep in mind that these are not likely to be dues paying members in good-standing. I don't think it has much traction at ALPA. ALPA will want it's dues money.

I hope you’re right. My TK job is neither here nor there. Having worked at two other major airlines that had retired guys as instructors I have to say I think ours is a better system.

Grumble 03-04-2018 08:13 PM


Originally Posted by Airhoss (Post 2543090)
I hope you’re right. My TK job is neither here nor there. Having worked at two other major airlines that had retired guys as instructors I have to say I think ours is a better system.

Having been through IAH TK w/ retired guys who hadn’t touched the airplane in 10+ years, and DEN TK... I would vehemently agree.

Andy 03-04-2018 08:21 PM


Originally Posted by BMEP100 (Post 2542551)
....And let the chest thumping begin..to be followed in a couple years by whining, teeth nashing and recall threats.

Same pattern every decade or so.

The pattern of pattern bargaining. :rolleyes:

LOL! But you need to edit your post to add a comment about all of the posters who pop up with that silly reprieve, 'don't negotiate in public.' No one's negotiating on these forums; people are discussing topics. And if history's proven anything, it's that the posters on these forums are at least two standard deviations outside the mean. Example: on the contract extension, if one were to go by the polling results here, the extension would have gone down in flames instead of passing with ~80% yes votes.

PowderFinger 03-05-2018 03:56 AM


Originally Posted by M5000 (Post 2542680)
I sounds like I may need to review my governing documents. I’m prepared to follow the FOM, WOM, and Flight Manual in exacting detail. Precise, calculated, detail to ensure the safety of our employees and passengers. I will not overlook any detail, no matter how small.

I like these calm little moments before the storm ...

JoePatroni 03-05-2018 04:35 AM


Originally Posted by Grumble (Post 2543106)
Having been through IAH TK w/ retired guys who hadn’t touched the airplane in 10+ years, and DEN TK... I would vehemently agree.

So would I, especially since most of those guys were Abbott’s boys. Hard to envision spots open to retired pilots that would NOT become a favoritism system, just like the L-CAL training department and, my personal favorite, the “flight test” group- ESPECIALLY when those guys kept their “positions” while we furloughed legitimate pilot positions after 9-11. Nothing good is going to come of this.

Dave Fitzgerald 03-05-2018 07:45 AM


Originally Posted by JoePatroni (Post 2543194)
.... and, my personal favorite, the “flight test” group- ESPECIALLY when those guys kept their “positions” while we furloughed legitimate pilot positions after 9-11. Nothing good is going to come of this.

You may be misinformed. The flight test group may fly under our contract, but they do not have seniority positions, and are not allowed to fly in revenue service, or even a generic ferry. They are a totally separate group. If UAL is furloughing, it may or may not affect the flight test group.

Yes, they are legitimate pilots, most with formal flight test school experience, and multiple higher degrees. They have to live in the bay area, and can't commute to a flight test job. Cost of living....

Airhoss 03-05-2018 10:08 AM


Originally Posted by Dave Fitzgerald (Post 2543337)
You may be misinformed. The flight test group may fly under our contract, but they do not have seniority positions, and are not allowed to fly in revenue service, or even a generic ferry. They are a totally separate group. If UAL is furloughing, it may or may not affect the flight test group.

Yes, they are legitimate pilots, most with formal flight test school experience, and multiple higher degrees. They have to live in the bay area, and can't commute to a flight test job. Cost of living....

Guessing he's talking about the test guys from the LCAL side back before the merger?

And yes all of our current test guys are TPS graduates.

untied 03-05-2018 11:40 AM

How much are we paying PI's at TK?

Aren't some guys making $230,000 or more?

What is the "industry standard" pay for a simulator instructor?

I like the current guys, but I can see why the company might get frustrated paying WAY over market value.

worstpilotever 03-05-2018 12:05 PM


Originally Posted by Airhoss (Post 2543449)
Guessing he's talking about the test guys from the LCAL side back before the merger?

And yes all of our current test guys are TPS graduates.

But do they put cover sheets on their TPS reports?

Ni hao 03-05-2018 12:33 PM

$230K I hear more like $350K ++




Originally Posted by untied (Post 2543514)
How much are we paying PI's at TK?

Aren't some guys making $230,000 or more?

What is the "industry standard" pay for a simulator instructor?

I like the current guys, but I can see why the company might get frustrated paying WAY over market value.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:24 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands