Search

Notices

JFK???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-31-2018 | 04:27 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 5,233
Likes: 66
Default

Originally Posted by webecheck
Nah man, you got it all wrong. Do you think Kirby is going to throw his hands in the air and say United can’t compete since the pilots won’t budge on scope? He’ll immediately be replaced by someone who thinks they can....and then we’ll end up with a 100 seater to upgauge and/or open more markets like delta did.

Besides, I’m happy with my QoL and my contract. Scope is a non issue imo because they don’t have enough ammo to use on pay rates to convince me, or anyone I’ve talked to, that it’s worth it. To think the entire UAL increased profitability gameplan rests on us giving scope relief means our current mgmt won’t be in place for long.
Well thanks for that Captain Obvious

It’s amazing how satire with even a touch of reality can go over people’s heads....

Wall Street won’t accept that excuse. Sometimes they are aligned with our interests.
YMMMV, but Wall St. rarely, IF EVER has labor’s interest at heart.

Doesn’t matter if you’re in a bankruptcy environment or the most lucrative in the history of airlines.
Reply
Old 05-31-2018 | 04:36 PM
  #12  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 670
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by John Carr
Well thanks for that Captain Obvious

It’s amazing how satire with even a touch of reality can go over people’s heads....



YMMMV, but Wall St. rarely, IF EVER has labor’s interest at heart.

Doesn’t matter if you’re in a bankruptcy environment or the most lucrative in the history of airlines.

I’ve read enough of your posts, I think you firmly believe what you wrote about scope, but you can backpedal saying “touch of reality”, which I guess makes my point, and then call me names if that helps feel like you aren’t being attacked by my post.

In this case, WS is aligned with the pilot group. Perhaps they’d like more RJ flying since it could be cheaper, but they won’t accept a business plan dependent on getting something our competitors aren’t.
Reply
Old 05-31-2018 | 04:43 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 5,233
Likes: 66
Default

Originally Posted by webecheck
I’ve read enough of your posts, I think you firmly believe what you wrote about scope, but you can backpedal saying “touch of reality”, which I guess makes my point, and then call me names if that helps feel like you aren’t being attacked by my post.
Really? I called you names?

You read way, WAY too much into it to create your own reality. Triggered much?

In this case, WS is aligned with the pilot group. Perhaps they’d like more RJ flying since it could be cheaper, but they won’t accept a business plan dependent on getting something our competitors aren’t.
PURE COINCIDENCE.

And simply more because of the economic environment than labor’s best interest.

Enjoy the rest of your evening.
Reply
Old 05-31-2018 | 06:43 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 1,255
Likes: 0
From: fifi whisperer
Default

From your friendly Jetblue pilot....



I hope y’all buy us.

That is all.
Reply
Old 05-31-2018 | 11:17 PM
  #15  
Dave Fitzgerald's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 2,209
Likes: 6
From: 777
Default

Originally Posted by seekingblue
From your friendly Jetblue pilot....



I hope y’all buy us.

That is all.
A great wish but, alas, pie in the sky. Too much overlap. DOT will never allow it to happen.
Reply
Old 06-01-2018 | 02:31 AM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Dave Fitzgerald
A great wish but, alas, pie in the sky. Too much overlap. DOT will never allow it to happen.
https://247wallst.com/transportation...acquired-next/

https://www.barrons.com/articles/air...lue-1525356236

Airline M&A: A Bidding War for Alaska, JetBlue?
Reply
Old 06-01-2018 | 05:47 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 1,255
Likes: 0
From: fifi whisperer
Default

Originally Posted by Dave Fitzgerald
A great wish but, alas, pie in the sky. Too much overlap. DOT will never allow it to happen.
Agree there is too much overlap in NYC/EWR. Other than that, our route structures are fairly complimentary.

If this were to be seriously considered, there would need to be several divestures; most notably EWR. SFO is actually a fairly big destination for us now, so that may require a divestiture as well.
Reply
Old 06-01-2018 | 06:21 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 705
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by seekingblue
Agree there is too much overlap in NYC/EWR. Other than that, our route structures are fairly complimentary.

If this were to be seriously considered, there would need to be several divestures; most notably EWR. SFO is actually a fairly big destination for us now, so that may require a divestiture as well.
How quaint it is for the JBLU pilot informing us what would be divested. You know about as much as we do. Which is zilch. Now where's that nb/snb order for organic growth?
Reply
Old 06-01-2018 | 06:24 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 2,032
Likes: 18
Default

Originally Posted by seekingblue
Agree there is too much overlap in NYC/EWR. Other than that, our route structures are fairly complimentary.

If this were to be seriously considered, there would need to be several divestures; most notably EWR. SFO is actually a fairly big destination for us now, so that may require a divestiture as well.
You actually believe they would divest EWR? That’s laughable.
Reply
Old 06-01-2018 | 07:44 AM
  #20  
Dave Fitzgerald's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 2,209
Likes: 6
From: 777
Default

Originally Posted by JoePatroni
You actually believe they would divest EWR? That’s laughable.
More likely a slot sale in JFK, and gate sale. Even though JFK has more runways, and isn't affected nearly as much by a drop of rain. It's all speculation anyway. The Jet Blue guys might have a shinier crystal ball than we do, so maybe they do have better info.

Not really pertinent, it isn't going to happen anyway.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
withthatsaid182
Regional
12
04-01-2010 06:21 PM
AAflyer
Major
34
04-01-2010 09:18 AM
AUS_ATC
Major
14
03-09-2010 06:26 AM
RockBottom
Major
0
06-02-2007 10:09 AM
Sir James
Major
0
07-29-2005 07:02 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices