Search
Notices

737 MAX grounded

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-15-2019, 10:14 PM
  #251  
Stuck Mic
 
Firsttimeflyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,059
Default

I really hope we get additional training on any extra systems associated with the MAX along with hour for hour pay paid for by Boeing. They wanted to skate by on the bare minimum which didn’t even turn out to be remotely close to the minimum and now we are stuck with grounded airplanes, questionable CBT training, reduced flying, reduced hiring, etc.
Firsttimeflyer is offline  
Old 04-16-2019, 01:34 AM
  #252  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 705
Default

Originally Posted by flightmedic01 View Post
Get ready for the SRM opportunities!
Care to explain that one? The same number of pilots but less aircraft mean less flying/SRM opportunities no?
Floyd is offline  
Old 04-16-2019, 03:06 AM
  #253  
Gets Weekends Off
 
APC225's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,866
Default

Originally Posted by Floyd View Post
Care to explain that one? The same number of pilots but less aircraft mean less flying/SRM opportunities no?
General disruption of the schedule. It may not be on just the 737, which will be used differently (more sections, overnights in differently planned locations), but other fleets that will be used to fill the gap, increasing their flying without an increase in pilots.
Originally Posted by cadetdrivr View Post
Looks like UA has pulled a 757 back out of the boneyard. The fleet guys must really be scrambling.
Any time there’s a deviation from the long term steady state plan it causes resources of all kinds to be out of place which will leave scheduling struggling to match what they’ve got with what they need. SRM is one way to do it.
APC225 is offline  
Old 04-16-2019, 03:55 AM
  #254  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 705
Default

Originally Posted by APC225 View Post
General disruption of the schedule. It may not be on just the 737, which will be used differently (more sections, overnights in differently planned locations), but other fleets that will be used to fill the gap, increasing their flying without an increase in pilots.Any time there’s a deviation from the long term steady state plan it causes resources of all kinds to be out of place which will leave scheduling struggling to match what they’ve got with what they need. SRM is one way to do it.
On other fleets I agree. I wonder what the current utilization rates are on the Bus and 57.
Floyd is offline  
Old 04-16-2019, 07:14 AM
  #255  
Gets Weekends Off
 
APC225's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,866
Default

Originally Posted by Floyd View Post
On other fleets I agree. I wonder what the current utilization rates are on the Bus and 57.
I've already experienced it in the 737 fleet. A 900 was listed as 5 hours late the day before the flight because it was covering for Max segment(s) in the prior 24 hours. At least one crew, maybe more, were not within 117 parameters for the dominoe delays of subsequent flights.

The Max flights were built into the schedule many months out, to include the ones not yet on the property. If they plan to continue to fly these flights without the Max...
Originally Posted by flightmedic01 View Post
Get ready for the SRM opportunities!
APC225 is offline  
Old 04-16-2019, 02:24 PM
  #256  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2012
Position: CAP A320
Posts: 300
Default

Originally Posted by Floyd View Post
On other fleets I agree. I wonder what the current utilization rates are on the Bus and 57.
Bus has been covering some max flights for sure, with built pairings having DHs.
fanaticalflyer is offline  
Old 04-16-2019, 05:52 PM
  #257  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,159
Default

Originally Posted by APC225 View Post
Any time there’s a deviation from the long term steady state plan it causes resources of all kinds to be out of place which will leave scheduling struggling to match what they’ve got with what they need. SRM is one way to do it.
Yep.

PLUS THIS: other fleets doing the mission of this aircraft, plus doing our own mission. I am glad for the senior manning pay. Wife very happy. BUT...I have passed on more senior manning due to fatigue and being worn out. You can't burn the candle at both ends for more than a month. As a fleet, as a pilot base, allot of pressure being put on reserves. They are a bit worn out as well. We were thin staffed before the max got grounded. Now, we really humping it. Lots of pilots with 100/672 issues. Don't see the feds granting any waivers on that.
baseball is offline  
Old 04-17-2019, 06:23 AM
  #258  
Gets Weekends Off
 
APC225's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,866
Default

https://theprint.in/world/us-regulat...aining/222614/

"Returning the 737 Max to service will require many more steps than the report. Not only must it receive a technical sign-off by the FAA, but there is also the tricky issue of public acceptance..."

That one's easy. Use the Dynamic Pricing algorithm to float it to the top of Kayak, sorted cheapest fare first.
APC225 is offline  
Old 04-17-2019, 06:31 AM
  #259  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Dave Fitzgerald's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Position: 777
Posts: 2,158
Default

Originally Posted by APC225 View Post
https://theprint.in/world/us-regulat...aining/222614/

"Returning the 737 Max to service will require many more steps than the report. Not only must it receive a technical sign-off by the FAA, but there is also the tricky issue of public acceptance..."

That one's easy. Use the Dynamic Pricing algorithm to float it to the top of Kayak, sorted cheapest fare first.
The collective consciousness of the public is short. Doesn't everyone remember the 787 battery fires? The media and everyone else was saying what a horrible plane that is and would never fly on it. I give it 2 years and no one will even remember the issue.

The 787 actually had far worse problems than the Max will ever have and no one remembers those.....witness a brand new 787 in ANA colors in the Pima air museum.
Dave Fitzgerald is offline  
Old 04-17-2019, 07:32 AM
  #260  
Strike averted!
 
at6d's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Position: B737
Posts: 3,676
Default

The Pima 787 was a test ship and unsellable as such.
at6d is online now  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CLazarus
United
810
04-04-2020 06:58 PM
n606tw
JetBlue
47
10-20-2019 09:29 AM
Sunvox
United
45
03-17-2017 05:56 AM
Raptor
FedEx
132
07-20-2016 05:08 PM
Kapitanleutnant
Foreign
0
04-11-2015 07:32 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices