DHS suspends Global Entry for NY residents
02-11-2020 | 05:26 AM
#21
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,361
Likes: 58
Ummmm.....how is this falling under strict scrutiny? Seems more like a rational basis analysis. I think the more poignant issue will involve those who have already been issued Global Entry/TSA-Pre/NEXUS/SENTRI and seek to renew.
02-11-2020 | 05:22 PM
#22
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
From: A320 FO
You are who you vote for!!!
02-11-2020 | 06:07 PM
#23
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,213
Likes: 14
From: guppy CA
Renewals also won't be permitted if they can't access the state's databases.
02-12-2020 | 10:55 AM
#25
Line Holder
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 488
Likes: 0
From: Ending the Backlog one claim at a time
You can hope. Just because strict scrutiny has traditionally been applied to state action doesn’t mean it has to be. Even Rational basis would take some tortured linguistic gymnastics. But, you never know. Heck, they can simply invoke the Commerce Clause and kill the rule.
02-12-2020 | 03:08 PM
#26
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,159
Likes: 1
I don't think so. It's a continual analysis. Just because it was issued to you doesn't mean anything. The database is a continual scrub. Initial issue is one thing. That's just the first hurdle. But, you can lose your status at anytime. Therefore maintenance is just as important as initial issuance. Naturally, renewal is hard if you can't maintain it as well. having a continual "clean sweep" of required data/law enforcement history helps to maintain that status.
02-12-2020 | 04:00 PM
#27
Nonsense Spewer
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
From: In the corner using a lampshade as a hat.
If a lot of people loved each other, the world would be a better place to live.
02-12-2020 | 04:16 PM
#28
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,361
Likes: 58
You can hope. Just because strict scrutiny has traditionally been applied to state action doesn’t mean it has to be. Even Rational basis would take some tortured linguistic gymnastics. But, you never know. Heck, they can simply invoke the Commerce Clause and kill the rule.
Maybe it will all be resolved after tomorrow's meeting.
02-12-2020 | 04:50 PM
#29
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,361
Likes: 58
I don't think so. It's a continual analysis. Just because it was issued to you doesn't mean anything. The database is a continual scrub. Initial issue is one thing. That's just the first hurdle. But, you can lose your status at anytime. Therefore maintenance is just as important as initial issuance. Naturally, renewal is hard if you can't maintain it as well. having a continual "clean sweep" of required data/law enforcement history helps to maintain that status.
02-12-2020 | 06:52 PM
#30
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,213
Likes: 14
From: guppy CA
I agree with you that there is a scrubbing but I'm not so sure Benito Cuomo prevails on any of this. However, he would be way out on a limb denying access to DHS for those who have already established eligibility for TTPs. There is no need to grant sanctuary to those who have already established they are lawful citizens/aliens which, presumably, is done during your initial application. A denial of access to criminal databases for the renewal individual would run counter to the purpose of their purported sanctuary laws.
If they deny complete access to federal agencies then NYers are SOL for Global Entry. I guess that'll make Global Entry lines short at EWR.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
