Search

Notices

Furlough estimate

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-04-2020 | 04:32 PM
  #1061  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 819
Likes: 2
From: 756 left
Default

The 1st round of this furlough will be much larger than the first round of the previous two furloughs. But for those that haven't been through it before, the dust doesn't settle after the initial round. It's just the start. Question is will they announce their aim number from the start or just announce the first round and leave those that are left just hanging on their creeping body dump.
Reply
Old 07-04-2020 | 05:16 PM
  #1062  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,150
Likes: 9
Default

Originally Posted by 89Pistons
The 1st round of this furlough will be much larger than the first round of the previous two furloughs. But for those that haven't been through it before, the dust doesn't settle after the initial round. It's just the start. Question is will they announce their aim number from the start or just announce the first round and leave those that are left just hanging on their creeping body dump.
there is really no incentive to announce anything until they have to.
Reply
Old 07-04-2020 | 05:22 PM
  #1063  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 819
Likes: 2
From: 756 left
Default

Originally Posted by TFAYD
there is really no incentive to announce anything until they have to.
Nope. There isn't. They weren't going to announce until the last minute in 08 until the MC said he would if they didn't come clean. June 23, 2008 is when they announced 1450 if I remember correctly.
Reply
Old 07-04-2020 | 10:17 PM
  #1064  
Nucflash's Avatar
Orbis Non Sufficit
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 788
Likes: 10
Default

Originally Posted by 89Pistons
We had 16 rounds of furloughs after 9/11 to get to 2172. And multiple rounds in 08/09 to get to 1437. Only mention that to say that letters not arriving yesterday don't provide any sense of protection. Every extra day helps though.
We had a somewhat normal schedule operating back then. Now they can slice and dice all they want up front and not risk understaffing.
Reply
Old 07-04-2020 | 11:16 PM
  #1065  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 819
Likes: 2
From: 756 left
Default

Originally Posted by Nucflash
We had a somewhat normal schedule operating back then. Now they can slice and dice all they want up front and not risk understaffing.
No disagreement there. They can go deep without blinking. By deep I mean a couple thousand in the first round.
Reply
Old 07-05-2020 | 03:47 AM
  #1066  
JetBlast77's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 661
Likes: 0
From: A320
Default

The current environment is unprecedented. We are flying 20% of our schedule and the company had a 6 month heads up to start the bids/retraining. They could easily furlough 3000+ in October and not blink an eye. I still don’t understand why people compare this to past furloughs. 9/11 was a sudden unexpected event that they had to react to immediately, while still flying a 50-60%+ schedule. Apples to oranges compared to now. The CARES act provided them a heads up to do this as quickly and efficiently as possible.
Reply
Old 07-05-2020 | 05:51 AM
  #1067  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 741
Likes: 40
Default

Originally Posted by JetBlast77
The current environment is unprecedented. We are flying 20% of our schedule and the company had a 6 month heads up to start the bids/retraining. They could easily furlough 3000+ in October and not blink an eye. I still don’t understand why people compare this to past furloughs. 9/11 was a sudden unexpected event that they had to react to immediately, while still flying a 50-60%+ schedule. Apples to oranges compared to now. The CARES act provided them a heads up to do this as quickly and efficiently as possible.
Numbers are wrong. 30% july, 40% for August. None of this accounts for the 600 cargo flights a month that are going on.

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
Reply
Old 07-05-2020 | 06:20 AM
  #1068  
Dave Fitzgerald's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 2,209
Likes: 6
From: 777
Default

Originally Posted by GPullR
Numbers are wrong. 30% july, 40% for August. None of this accounts for the 600 cargo flights a month that are going on.

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
I wouldn't hang your hat on the cargo flights and a small fraction of what the schedule used to look like. Remember, those are in lieu of the pax flights. The cargo flights will stop once pax flights resume in a more normal schedule. The cargo will go with the pax then. But....I don't think that will happen any time soon as this has turned into a political football. Europe not letting in US passengers, Chinese playing games with required testing, and restrictions only for non-Chinese airlines.
Reply
Old 07-05-2020 | 06:36 AM
  #1069  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 740
Likes: 19
Default

Originally Posted by Dave Fitzgerald
I wouldn't hang your hat on the cargo flights and a small fraction of what the schedule used to look like. Remember, those are in lieu of the pax flights. The cargo flights will stop once pax flights resume in a more normal schedule. The cargo will go with the pax then. But....I don't think that will happen any time soon as this has turned into a political football. Europe not letting in US passengers, Chinese playing games with required testing, and restrictions only for non-Chinese airlines.
I'd "hang my hat on that" to some extent. It's not growth, but seems (hopefully) to be a surprise pocket of stability that bridges a gap in the absence of int'l pax flying to/from the US - which is its own trainwreck of an issue. If nothing else it's definitely helpful for our 787 pilot numbers and therefore overall numbers.

Amongst the many things that will probably begin to be "revealed" in a couple of days, I think that the initial baseline 30% plan may not have accounted for the relative success of cargo-only and other carriers pushing us to up our domestic game (relatively speaking), though on the flip side it also probably didn't account for FL, TX, AZ surges that are "the biggest and best" #somuchwinning
Reply
Old 07-05-2020 | 06:39 AM
  #1070  
duvie's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,246
Likes: 0
From: WB Bunkie
Default

Originally Posted by JetBlast77
The current environment is unprecedented. We are flying 20% of our schedule and the company had a 6 month heads up to start the bids/retraining. They could easily furlough 3000+ in October and not blink an eye. I still don’t understand why people compare this to past furloughs. 9/11 was a sudden unexpected event that they had to react to immediately, while still flying a 50-60%+ schedule. Apples to oranges compared to now. The CARES act provided them a heads up to do this as quickly and efficiently as possible.
totally understandable to be on the skeptical side. However, I think one of the main differences is the uncertainty around the recovery. Some metrics are already back up to 100%, while others are lagging terribly. It is very hard to say what the economy will look like a year from now. I personally think this is what’s driving uncertainty for the company’s staffing projections.

2001 not only saw the terrorist attacks, but a fairly large bursting of the tech bubble, which put us in a recession. 2008 saw one of the biggest drops of the stock market in a century. I am not bullish per se, but while not likely, I don’t think a quick recovery is totally out of the question.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201736
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
3raser
Cargo
21
12-22-2012 10:01 AM
DirectLawOnly
United
45
12-05-2012 05:39 AM
brownie
Cargo
201
03-05-2009 07:55 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices