More and Earlier 737 MAX orders...
#61
Line Holder
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 741
Likes: 40
Yeah, I heard 757s EWR to Berlin and back was an issue anytime it operated. But I also remember a couple of 757s that had issues going back to EWR from LHR in the winter. All I’m trying to say if a 757 has issues performing, then a Guppious Maximus will DEFINITELY have issues. No Guppious Maximus can fly as far as a 757.
Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk
#62
Line Holder
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 741
Likes: 40
Guppies across the NATs is going to suck huge!!! They are a speed bump!!! Every Boeing crossing the tracks is going at least .81. On the Triple and Sparkie we’re flying much faster than that. Not to mention the 747s that are crossing the NATs. In the 777 we’re usually around .84 and Sparkie is faster than that.
There's rumors that they will be adding tracks or designating tracks for slow aircraft like the airbus and 737.
Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk
#63
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,112
Likes: 0
From: SFO Guppy CA
No different then the 321 will be. And no not every boeing is going .81. The 757 is filed for .78 all the time and if you go .81 you won't be making it back all that often depending on where u come out of. Many times the 767 is filled for less then .80 as well.
There's rumors that they will be adding tracks or designating tracks for slow aircraft like the airbus and 737.
Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk
There's rumors that they will be adding tracks or designating tracks for slow aircraft like the airbus and 737.
Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk
#64
I never flew the 57 at .81.....that’s just ****ing gas. .79 was about Max before you just started wasting gas....it’s been 5 years but has something changed? The 767 we did .80/.81.....
#65
Banned
Joined: Oct 2020
Posts: 345
Likes: 0



