Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
United diversity....... >

United diversity.......

Search
Notices

United diversity.......

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-06-2021, 09:19 PM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Posts: 2,995
Default

As a person who self-identifies as Newmale (it’s a new gender) it kinda makes me wonder if companies are hiring the most qualified people or just hiring people because they feel sorry for a certain group.
Halon1211 is offline  
Old 04-06-2021, 09:59 PM
  #32  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Mar 2013
Posts: 74
Default

Originally Posted by SonicCarhop View Post
Do you believe that men are inherently better pilots than women? I'm guessing (and would agree) the answer is no.

So why are there 10 male pilots at United for every 1 female? Because the pool of candidates to work at a major airline currently only allows for that.

The announcement by United isn't a quota to hire a certain number of female mainline pilots. It's a goal to have a certain percentage of female/minority candidates into their Aviate pipeline program by breaking down barriers to entry and partnering with non-traditional sources for recruiting.

Down the line this will eventually expand and improve the hiring pool for pilots at major airlines, where pilots will continue to be hired based on skills and qualifications.
I think women with equal motivation and work ethic make equal pilots. I unfortunately know too many women that pilots just to say they're pilots and then scream disadvantaged from the rooftops if they're not hired, when they're not the best person for the job.

I think we can all agree that the best pilots should be flying without regard to race or gender. To get the best available candidates we need more candidates.. Start young by going to elementary and middle schools. Do high school career days. Introduce women to successful women in this career and others, but don't blindly make a 50% metric. 50% of aspiring pilots are not female and that is okay. I bet 50% of aspiring cosmetologist are not men and that's fine too. Help those that want in this career and are willing and able to make the sacririfces required. That goes for everyone, not just women and minorities. I will say, women have a much larger opportunity for scholarships and financial assistance, so I don't see that as the issue to entry compared to male counterparts.

These are my thoughts based on my career and experience in aviation. I'm glad I have this career and I'm actually really glad I know I earned this job and my gender didn't play a factor in checking some box.

Don't lower the standards. Keep the best people up front. Period.

SkylaneRG is offline  
Old 04-06-2021, 10:44 PM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
hummingbear's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,315
Default

Not sure exactly how they’re defining “people of color”, but 40% of our country’s population is non-white. Around 50% are women. It shouldn’t be too hard to fill half a class with other than white dudes without sacrificing standards.
hummingbear is offline  
Old 04-06-2021, 10:53 PM
  #34  
Get me outta here...
 
HuggyU2's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: Boeing right seat
Posts: 1,541
Default

Originally Posted by hummingbear View Post
It shouldn’t be too hard to fill half a class with other than white dudes without sacrificing standards.
Glad to know you have the solution that's not too hard! Care to share it with the rest of us?
HuggyU2 is offline  
Old 04-06-2021, 10:55 PM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2020
Posts: 556
Default

Originally Posted by MochaSwirl View Post
So someone please tell me, what the big deal is?

so as long as they’re qualified!

Nobody said anything about lowering standards

Well boom, they’re qualified some more than qualified,and it just so happens airlines are trying to be more diverse.

They have to pass the same checkrides you do, go through the same training as you do and follow procedures as you.
The big issue will be United allowing this “goal” to become a quota - like much of the rest of the corporate world is beginning to lean towards for the sake of “diversity.”

When you hire an individual with multiple check ride busts and half the flight time over a guy with a spotless record and a wealth of experience, you’ve created a problem. That’s inevitably what will happen, and United will not be a better airline for it.

You are doing a disservice to the entire industry by parroting the nonsense about “qualifications.” Hiring candidates who meet minimum standards should never be the goal, and certainly not just because of the demographic they were born into.

Are you the most qualified candidate for the job?

That should be the only metric being used. Anyone arguing for something else is begging for disaster. This is not an industry that can afford to sacrifice quality for the sake of being woke and making sure everyone knows how un-racist/sexist/phobic we are.

Are you the most qualified candidate for the job?

That’s it.
Andy Dufresne is offline  
Old 04-06-2021, 11:12 PM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MacrossJet's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2015
Posts: 278
Default

Originally Posted by StopBeingWhimps View Post
Unbelievable! It's amazing how far we have come as a society. We used to hire based on experience and qualifications.
Scratches head. When was that? Didn't United get sued back in the day by black WWII aviators, in order to finally integrate the cockpit? Hmmm.
MacrossJet is offline  
Old 04-07-2021, 02:17 AM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
hummingbear's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,315
Default

Originally Posted by HuggyU2 View Post
Glad to know you have the solution that's not too hard! Care to share it with the rest of us?
Just to be clear, you’re saying if less than 50% of a pilot training program are white males, it necessarily means selection standards have been lowered?
hummingbear is offline  
Old 04-07-2021, 02:53 AM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 919
Default

Originally Posted by hummingbear View Post
Not sure exactly how they’re defining “people of color”, but 40% of our country’s population is non-white. Around 50% are women. It shouldn’t be too hard to fill half a class with other than white dudes without sacrificing standards.

This is extreme oversimplification. The pilot field is mostly white male, and it's not due to racism. Women dominate certain fields, and minorities are more prevalent in certain fields. Im all for encouraging minorities and women to fly if they so choose, but hiring based on societal demographics instead of applicant pool demographics is just wrong.

To achieve the stated goal of 50%, they'll have to go to extremes to gather that much interest to level the demographic playing field. If not, this hiring practice is dangerous. If women make up 5% of applicants, but 50% of new hires, youre just taking anyone that comes along qualifications be damned.

Women I know are completely against this practice for reasons stated above. They have reached the top of their career through hard work and earned every bit of it. They have no desire to be put in a group of people with special privileges where people question their achievements.
flyguy23 is offline  
Old 04-07-2021, 03:15 AM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2017
Position: 175 CA
Posts: 1,285
Default

Originally Posted by hummingbear View Post
Not sure exactly how they’re defining “people of color”, but 40% of our country’s population is non-white. Around 50% are women. It shouldn’t be too hard to fill half a class with other than white dudes without sacrificing standards.

Not sure what decade you're living in.

Prior to covid, regional airlines couldn't hardly find pilots of any kind, at all. The ones they did find had a history of training failures and lead to deviations, incidents, accidents; Commutair, Envoy, Atlas - crashing a wide body. Imagine if that were a United 767 full of hundreds of innocent people.

Holding the standard during huge turn over is tough enough. Accomplishing some nazi-style genetic social engineering program on top of that is just not in the cards, regardless of how good it sounds on paper.

If you truly value safety over everything else, you'll take the most qualified candidates no matter what they look like or have between their legs.
Varsity is offline  
Old 04-07-2021, 03:22 AM
  #40  
Nonsense Spewer
 
Air Stang 7's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Position: In the corner using a lampshade as a hat.
Posts: 523
Default

Originally Posted by Halon1211 View Post
As a person who self-identifies as Newmale (it’s a new gender) it kinda makes me wonder if companies are hiring the most qualified people or just hiring people because they feel sorry for a certain group.
I am a gray tree frog. It allows me to select the color and gender currently the most in demand by the racist woke people.
Air Stang 7 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Gordon C
Air Wisconsin
10
06-11-2020 03:16 PM
iahflyr
United
117
02-04-2018 04:52 AM
flightmedic01
United
19
08-11-2014 12:16 PM
Rotor2prop
Major
13
07-11-2012 10:55 AM
Freight Dog
Money Talk
20
11-08-2011 01:06 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices