Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
United diversity....... >

United diversity.......

Search

Notices

United diversity.......

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-07-2021 | 08:04 AM
  #71  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Varsity
CFI's with ATP's aren't competent jet pilots. One regional has had 4 runway excursions in the last 16 months, with about 1/8th the fleet size of any legacy.
Sounds like that airline has a training program deficiency. Something is wrong with the culture in that school house. There have been major crashes with pilots who had thousands of hours of expertise flying jets...
Old 04-07-2021 | 08:04 AM
  #72  
block30's Avatar
Bracing for Fallacies
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,543
Likes: 0
From: In favor of good things, not in favor of bad things
Default

Originally Posted by Vernon Demerest
Junior high is a good time to warn kids about maintaining a clean record etc. Not necessarily a discussion on academics
Agreed.

Also agreed with your post about who stops by the cockpit to take a look.

I have noticed a more genuine appreciation of the cockpit tour from non white people and its touching.

With that said I can't get behind straight up quotas, especially for just targeting one specific job, not the whole organization.
Old 04-07-2021 | 08:08 AM
  #73  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 3,633
Likes: 209
Default

Originally Posted by Flydafe
What we have is a trade..does not require a college degree. The standards will not go down because of diversity. What makes you think that standards will go down due to Aviate kids learning to fly Cessnas or more women and diverse people flying in the cockpit of passenger jets? They all have completed the training and have an ATP plus years of existence by the time they reach the airline level.

China sends their youth to America to fly then gives them jobs. Mexico the same for the most part. Planes are not falling out of the sky.
I totally agree. My example of medical school was only presented because the data is tracked. Most anyone could do this job with the right training. My point is not in the physical accomplishment of it, but in the acceptance to it. If a goal is set to only select based on race/gender, history has shown that the initial selection will have lower standards to meet that goal.

So you end up with more qualified candidates who do not get selected because they are x race or y gender. In the case of medical school, x would be Asian and y would be female.

Last edited by ThumbsUp; 04-07-2021 at 08:24 AM.
Old 04-07-2021 | 08:34 AM
  #74  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,629
Likes: 0
From: 756 Left Side
Default

I think some of you need to look at the ****** Aviate Website.

It speaks directly about "The Most Direct Path to a ****** Flight Deck"

The purpose of this "school" is to teach flying that should lead to our cockpits (opps.. now I've done it!). And when you set "quotas" there is no way around the fact that some qualified people will not get in due to those quotas while some lower qualified people while get in because of the quotas.

As far as the reason why certain groups decide on a career has already been discussed by numerous individuals on this thread.
But isn't it interesting that less that a year ago people were screaming about 4000+ displacement and potential furloughs...
Months ago they were screaming about multi million dollar losses a day and Cares Act 2 and then 3 needing to be implements...

Now they have us changing the way we are suppose to look at life with regards to hiring.

I wonder, what are the stats on the Hogan test for Pass/Fail for-
Males
Non White Males
Females
Non White Females
Military vs. Civilian

So where does this lead? Do we change the test because we don't like the results?

I'm all for helping people.. it's what we, as human beings should be doing. But when you set a quota, you create more hurt than help. Just my opinion.

FS, FP & FtC
Always
Motch

PS)
3 Yrs 5 Months 19 Days-
Since TI and our union stated they were working with management to get a new UPA (at amendable date)
2 Yrs, 2 Months, 7 Days-
Since our UPA became amendable
1 Yr, 3 Months, 6 Days-
Since 2/3rds of this pilot group saw a pay raise, though about a 3rd does have the opportunity to bid into a higher seat (maybe)
{as of 7 Apr 21}
Old 04-07-2021 | 08:44 AM
  #75  
AAL763's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by SonicCarhop
Your points about being an airline pilot being a questionable/uncertain career are completely accurate, but that doesn't explain why there are 10 times as many men as women in it.
Perhaps because women are, by their nature, prone to want to have children and raise them? A flying career makes that pretty damn hard to do. Hence, why you just won’t find the number of women interested in the job as you will men. It’s not some secret sexist plan to suppress women from the cockpit, it’s just human nature. Last time I checked, there weren’t any barriers to entry into flight schools if you were a certain race/gender. Oh wait.... Now there will be if you are a white male....

Regarding the financial barriers, do minorities/women not have access to loans, or are loans only available to white males? I also can recall the numerous scholarship opportunities at UND/ERAU available ONLY to women and/or POC. Some barrier I tell ya...

Last edited by AAL763; 04-07-2021 at 08:56 AM.
Old 04-07-2021 | 08:59 AM
  #76  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 676
Likes: 6
From: B747 FO
Default

Originally Posted by Flydafe
I’ve had flight control failures and a pitch trim runway..a landing gear issue but nothing life threatening but all with passengers onboard. Thank goodness the airline trained us for emergencies and how to follow a QRH. Can you imagine if the airline didn’t have SOP and emergency procedures?

Thank goodness for all of the prior pilot training from private to ATP and the standards.
WTH would you define life threatening? Wings falling off?
You are talking about some of the more serious problems we face. I'll take engine fire and failure any day of control problems...
Old 04-07-2021 | 09:00 AM
  #77  
oldmako's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 3,076
Likes: 3
From: The GF of FUPM
Default

Originally Posted by Andy Dufresne
........

Men and women are wired differently, and there is absolutely nothing wrong with that.
Ive noticed more differences than just wires! 😏
Old 04-07-2021 | 09:01 AM
  #78  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 407
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by AAL763
Perhaps because women are, by their nature, prone to want to have children and raise them? A flying career makes that pretty damn hard to do. Hence, why you just won’t find the number of women interested in the job as you will men. It’s not some secret sexist plan to suppress women from the cockpit, it’s just human nature. Last time I checked, there weren’t any barriers to entry into flight schools if you were a certain race/gender. Oh wait.... Now there will be if you are a white male....

Regarding the financial barriers, do minorities/women not have access to loans, or are loans only available to white males? I also can recall the numerous scholarship opportunities at UND/ERAU available ONLY to women and/or POC. Some barrier I tell ya...
Explain to me what about having XX chromasomes means you are destined to be more likely a nurse than a pilot. Absent society's influence, it should be much much closer to even.
Old 04-07-2021 | 09:02 AM
  #79  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2020
Posts: 556
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by AAL763
Perhaps because women are, by their nature, prone to want to have children and raise them? A flying career makes that pretty damn hard to do. Hence, why you just won’t find the number of women interested in the job as you will men. It’s not some secret sexist plan to suppress women from the cockpit, it’s just human nature. Last time I checked, there weren’t any barriers to entry into flight schools if you were a certain race/gender. Oh wait.... Now there will be if you are a white male....
Women are also more risk averse, have a completely different type of spatial intelligence, and are more likely to be emotional thinkers.

The same people shouting from the rooftops about "SCIENCE!!1!" really don't like science when it doesn't help them promote their agenda. Women and men are wired differently. There is nothing wrong with that.
Old 04-07-2021 | 09:04 AM
  #80  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 407
Likes: 0
Default

Y'all are making me nuts about this. They are proposing more outreach programs to achieve diversity. As in, encouraging more people to do the jobs, meeting women and people of color who are pilots. You're gonna tell me promoting things like field trips, discovery flights and cockpit tours etc are too woke??

Never ONE TIME has anyone suggested that we should simply waive the performance requirements for being a pilot.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Gordon C
Air Wisconsin
10
06-11-2020 03:16 PM
iahflyr
United
117
02-04-2018 04:52 AM
flightmedic01
United
19
08-11-2014 12:16 PM
Rotor2prop
Major
13
07-11-2012 10:55 AM
Freight Dog
Money Talk
20
11-08-2011 01:06 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices