Originally Posted by oldmako (Post 3220013)

UAL introduces a LONG term program that will allow them to groom future unionized employees as they see fit from the get-go. Said employees will have an astonishing amount of enthusiasm for Mother U once they get their "Wings with Elroy".

Todd goes along with it. He has his eyes on a desk in Willis or, HERNDON. (What a joke, but that's another thread)

Pilots on APC wax political and use all their big "woke" words in a fit of PC umbrage. Spittle and snot fly into space! Pilots forget that all they do is fly the shiny machines.

Rush smiles in his grave.

45 pages!

Kirby and the board laugh.

Originally Posted by Bluewaffle (Post 3219696)

why does it have to be anyone’s fault? All I’m saying is you’re never going to have a real impact in motivating the next generation until you hire people that look like them. That’s true for all professions, including the ones you mentioned

Originally Posted by Windshear (Post 3220065)

.

What about mentoring a child of any race or sex, and letting them know they're capable of ANYTHING? Then helping them down their dream path? With the right mentoring/motivation, kids don't need someone that looks like them to look up to!

Originally Posted by Bluewaffle (Post 3219658)

thats cute. It’s not about opportunity. It’s about seeing themselves in a position that historically has been dominated by white men. This profession is accessible to everyone. You wouldn’t know it by peeking in the cockpit the last 30 years.

Originally Posted by OOfff (Post 3220081)

These are the words of someone who had role models that looked like them.

Originally Posted by WhistlePig (Post 3219960)

I curious as to how you think that can be proven without interfering with a Company’s right to hire who the wish based on the “fit” of a candidate for example. How would you prove the violation in your hypothetical?

Originally Posted by CLazarus (Post 3219961)

Amen brutha.


Anywho, sorry to disrupt the race/sex-baiting and schoolyard insults but I just thought I'd point something out.


In the next decade, the announced 50% goal seems to be almost unobtainable considering where we are starting from as of this week. And yet, that might be wholly intentional. For whatever reason, sooner or hopefully much later someone is not going to make it through the Aviate program or reach it to UAL. A lawsuit or several will probably result. If charged with discrimination UAL will have an excellent defense at the ready: "We sincerely wanted this disadvantaged pilot to make it through the program and help meet our publicly announced hiring target... but he/she just didn't meet our uncompromising performance standards." Seems like a good defense to me.


Now, give me time to step out of the way of any renewed mud slinging. I've got to keep my hat and jacket clean another week.

Originally Posted by oldmako (Post 3220013)

UAL introduces a LONG term program that will allow them to groom future unionized employees as they see fit from the get-go. Said employees will have an astonishing amount of enthusiasm for Mother U once they get their "Wings with Elroy".

Todd goes along with it. He has his eyes on a desk in Willis or, HERNDON. (What a joke, but that's another thread)

Pilots on APC wax political and use all their big "woke" words in a fit of PC umbrage. Spittle and snot fly into space! Pilots forget that all they do is fly the shiny machines.

Rush smiles in his grave.

45 pages!

Kirby and the board laugh.

Originally Posted by OOfff (Post 3220094)

Well, we’re done here