Search

Notices

Vacancy 22-04V

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-08-2021 | 04:05 PM
  #21  
Aldo Raine's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
From: Killin' Natsees
Default

Originally Posted by GoCats67
This one should be interesting, but I don't think it will be too crazy. The next one (more narrowbody focused) will be down right ridiculous.
Anyone know why the snapshot would show unfilled CA vacancies? I’m sure there are sufficient bids to fill those vacancies.
Reply
Old 11-08-2021 | 04:11 PM
  #22  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
From: 756
Default

Originally Posted by Aldo Raine
Anyone know why the snapshot would show unfilled CA vacancies? I’m sure there are sufficient bids to fill those vacancies.
Guys are just not willing to jump on it yet or waiting for the final day to put in their stuff. The Captain bid will fill up, and WB FO will be offered in Indoc.
Reply
Old 11-08-2021 | 04:28 PM
  #23  
Banned
 
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 2,012
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Aldo Raine
Anyone know why the snapshot would show unfilled CA vacancies? I’m sure there are sufficient bids to fill those vacancies.
because there are insufficient bids to fill those vacancies
Reply
Old 11-08-2021 | 04:37 PM
  #24  
Aldo Raine's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
From: Killin' Natsees
Default

Originally Posted by ZeroTT
because there are insufficient bids to fill those vacancies
Not so. I know factually someone who bid for one of those vacancies and didn’t get it in the snapshot, but was conceptually “awarded” something lower on their bid list.

There was a reason behind the question.

Last edited by Aldo Raine; 11-08-2021 at 04:49 PM.
Reply
Old 11-08-2021 | 05:14 PM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 3,635
Likes: 210
Default

Originally Posted by Aldo Raine
Not so. I know factually someone who bid for one of those vacancies and didn’t get it in the snapshot, but was conceptually “awarded” something lower on their bid list.

There was a reason behind the question.
Is the system smart enough to preclude people from being awarded a CA bid without 1000 hours? Not sure if that applies to your example.
Reply
Old 11-08-2021 | 05:18 PM
  #26  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,020
Likes: 23
From: It's a plane and it's a seat
Default

Originally Posted by ThumbsUp
Is the system smart enough to preclude people from being awarded a CA bid without 1000 hours? Not sure if that applies to your example.
Why the system is smart enough
Reply
Old 11-08-2021 | 05:22 PM
  #27  
Aldo Raine's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
From: Killin' Natsees
Default

Originally Posted by ThumbsUp
Is the system smart enough to preclude people from being awarded a CA bid without 1000 hours? Not sure if that applies to your example.
Not applicable, as they had long ago completed the self-certify entry.
Reply
Old 11-08-2021 | 05:25 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 3,635
Likes: 210
Default

Originally Posted by flynd94
Why the system is smart enough

Not sure I understand what you’re saying here.
Reply
Old 11-08-2021 | 05:26 PM
  #29  
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
From: 737
Default

Originally Posted by Aldo Raine
Not applicable, as they had long ago completed the self-certify entry.
it’s possible to have a Captain bid in and still not get the award if your percentage isn’t met. Most people who are holding out, are waiting till they can hold weekends off on RSV. I’ve got a bid in to upgrade in lax when I get to 80%. It’s showing 81% as of this Snapshot.
Reply
Old 11-08-2021 | 05:27 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 3,635
Likes: 210
Default

Originally Posted by Aldo Raine
Not applicable, as they had long ago completed the self-certify entry.

Might still want to have your friend ask the question to crew resources if they are a sub-1k UAL FO. Given that this scenario hasn’t happened in decades, I wouldn’t be surprised if it’s only assessing their UAL time (if it even does a check of that)
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sarahswhere
United
64
05-20-2015 12:58 PM
steve0617
United
1
10-03-2014 01:28 PM
C-17 Driver
United
47
07-18-2014 07:08 PM
LeeMat
United
217
02-06-2013 07:04 PM
ERJ135
Regional
44
07-21-2008 06:49 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices