Search

Notices

Agreement In Principle

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-15-2022 | 10:20 AM
  #201  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by fadec
American cities are garbage. That's the real reason we commute. High crime. High taxes. Working people are treated as criminals while actual criminals raid. Do you travel? Other cities are nice. Other cities are clean and organized and safe. American cities by comparison are trash. I don't care about scope. I don't care about pay. I don't care about positive space commutes or other carve outs. I only care that we come together as a people to defend our way of life against all domestic enemies. I won't live in a place where a 60 year old woman can't walk home alone at 2 am. It is the role of government to eliminate threats. Safety and happiness are primary goals. Pre-crime is necessary. Weak bureaucrats wax about justice they can't possibly achieve while honest people cheer for threats removed. Only God can do justice against violent criminals. Our only hope in action is to remove threatening individuals before they do more harm. Killing to prevent harm is justified. Killing because of harm is not justified. This is how you are judged by your government and this is how you must judge your government. The death penalty is immoral. Pre-crime is moral. Remove all threats and make our cities safe. When this is done the commuter problem will be solved.
I just want you to know that I appreciate you.
Reply
Old 05-15-2022 | 11:54 AM
  #202  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 564
Likes: 7
Default

Originally Posted by Whiskeyjet1
Thank you for pointing out how illogical that thinking is so perfectly. People get such narrow focus and just don’t seem to to care about helping their fellow pilots who may have a different situation.
Please, that whole argument was just silly. There have to be lineholders, reserves, people on different fleets, instructors, etc. So there have to be provisions for these different groups. There doesn't have to be commuters, that is not a position within the company.
Reply
Old 05-15-2022 | 12:01 PM
  #203  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 381
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Chowdah
Add in there: intentional misreading/straw-manning

It's "straw-peopling", "Persons of Straw" or "Straw-Personning" ....please report for reeducation at the next DEI listening session.
Reply
Old 05-15-2022 | 12:27 PM
  #204  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 5,291
Likes: 114
Default

Originally Posted by EAFF95
I love the old “My situation sucked and now yours should too” mentality of the people who made choices and may now regret them due to potential contractual updates.

Fun times watching from the outside.
Even more fun on the inside!!!!
Reply
Old 05-15-2022 | 12:34 PM
  #205  
Nucflash's Avatar
Orbis Non Sufficit
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 788
Likes: 10
Default

Just because they may provide a PS ticket for commuting doesn’t mean it will take the huge pain-in-the-ass factor out of the “choice”. Far from it.

For most, you will still have to drag yourself out to the commuting jet plenty early in order to fly to work on time. There will still be plenty of times you’ll have to go in the night before or leave the next morning. That still means hotels, hanging around at the hub, etc, etc. Don’t get too excited about this being a paradigm shift for the better in all cases.
Reply
Old 05-15-2022 | 12:54 PM
  #206  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 546
Likes: 0
From: Reverse Cowgirl
Default

Originally Posted by guppie
Good for them. Let the rational commuters buy a ticket if they wanna commute. No special privileges, just seniority. The way it is, baby
The country it rapidly changing. Most of the mega bases at all airlines are becoming unlivable or unlivable with a kid in a public school. Airline management doesn't want to pay a proper airline Captain wage for a person living in New York or LA so a positive space ticket is a win for them going into the future.
Reply
Old 05-15-2022 | 12:59 PM
  #207  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Broncofan
If the positive space commuting actually becomes a thing, I’ll take them up on it. I’ve been wanting to move out of this high cost city for a while, and take that junior base upgrade. Being able to live wherever you want relatively stress free is a huge cost and QOL benefit.
you’re still blowing half a day on each side of a trip. No thanks
Reply
Old 05-15-2022 | 01:06 PM
  #208  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 4,164
Likes: 620
Default

Originally Posted by Knotcher
Please, that whole argument was just silly. There have to be lineholders, reserves, people on different fleets, instructors, etc. So there have to be provisions for these different groups. There doesn't have to be commuters, that is not a position within the company.
So there shouldn't even be a commuter policy in the contract is what you're saying? People like you really have no clue.
Reply
Old 05-15-2022 | 01:47 PM
  #209  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 41
Likes: 1
From: B737 CA
Default

Ignorant question. How does the company avoid a paid commute counting as duty as far as 117 is concerned? How does the FAA discern a paid commute from a DH?
Reply
Old 05-15-2022 | 01:54 PM
  #210  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 1,596
Likes: 378
Default

Originally Posted by HiPlaneDrifter
Break it down into voting groups. Age 61 and older will likely never see another contract. Expect this one to be heavily weighted for them. Commuters are another easy standing subgroup to gain votes from. Reserves are nebulous because it is “usually” a short lived status that people will hold their nose and suffer through. Pay, travel, scope impact everyone….but if you get enough votes from just pleasing a few groups the TA passes. It doesn’t have to come down to carve outs, but that’s been the theme lately.
This is a ridiculous argument. I’ll make it simple. The company wants this to pass. So they are going to put pay raises in the contract. They are doing this to bribe the pilots to pass the agreement. We need to vote the agreement down and demand they remove the pay raises, since they are only in the contract to get us to pass it.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rickair7777
SkyWest
453
04-20-2020 02:36 PM
shoelu
Major
5
09-03-2015 12:16 PM
ERJ135
American
26
02-26-2013 05:54 PM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JungleBus
Major
121
12-20-2008 04:13 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices