TA Considerations: Sections
06-23-2022 | 06:17 AM
#81
Line Holder
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 819
Likes: 2
From: 756 left
Next downturn we're unlikely to to get billions in relief funds and we're unlikely to get the majority of the pilot group to agree to the three tier pay scheme.
06-23-2022 | 06:29 PM
#82
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,738
Likes: 5
From: Sleeping in the black swan’s nest.
Considering I met him over 10 years ago when he was a 777 F/O and senior to me. I’d have to say you’re full of chit, but hey at least you’re not afraid to spout it out loud and proud.
06-23-2022 | 07:02 PM
#83
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 463
Likes: 0
Done deal…
With roughly 1800 literally voting on one section that concerns offline, TK and LCA and how many within 2-3 years of retirement this baby is a done deal regardless. Never been an easier setup for 50+1. Looking forward to seeing it sometime this weekend but smart enough to know the pilot vote is a moot point. It’ll pass regardless.
06-24-2022 | 02:55 AM
#84
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,561
Likes: 0
From: Captain
With roughly 1800 literally voting on one section that concerns offline, TK and LCA and how many within 2-3 years of retirement this baby is a done deal regardless. Never been an easier setup for 50+1. Looking forward to seeing it sometime this weekend but smart enough to know the pilot vote is a moot point. It’ll pass regardless.
61% to 39% passing
06-24-2022 | 04:20 AM
#88
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 463
Likes: 0
This type scenario/vote is exactly why I have always said that if offline and TK should have a separate contract altogether and by being offline or TK should not be able to vote on our contract nor should we vote on their 1-2 sections that are over and above ours. Now notice I did not say LCA cause they actively fly the line with a bid schedule. So only offline does this refer to.
Any position that is not bid with by their hire date seniority and placed in a position by an interview with management should not be voting on our contract. And as long as this practice continues ALPA is simply an Ops group association and not a true union.
Any position that is not bid with by their hire date seniority and placed in a position by an interview with management should not be voting on our contract. And as long as this practice continues ALPA is simply an Ops group association and not a true union.
06-24-2022 | 04:35 AM
#89
Banned
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
One month for the longest. Kirby WANTS a new contract. United is motivated to get this done. If we vote it down they will throw some more money at us to get it done. There is no way Kirby allows this to linger.
06-24-2022 | 04:45 AM
#90
Line Holder
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
benefits United to get it done soon before they have to match or exceed someone else’s bar. Don’t fear timeline. If it’s not a great TA vote No
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
