Search

Notices

voting to stay open.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-06-2022 | 06:55 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Default

The argument for the C12 and other LEC no voters to vote yes on this is twofold…

1. there is a threat of company accusation of not “negotiating in good faith” if they torpedo their own deal and pull the TA and it’s vote (even though it’s a turd)…

2. perhaps due to (item 1) they believe that the best case scenario going forward is a resounding and overwhelmingly unified NO VOTE to send a message!

EVERYONE NEEDS TO VOTE NO TO THIS HORRIBLE CONCESSION-FILLED TURD! We must have a record and unified turnout!

They have stopped the town halls pushing it. It needs to die in this vote. Clean house and start over!
Reply
Old 07-06-2022 | 07:22 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Default

This is the MECs Kobayashi Maru. 2 days of secret meetings and all we get is “the vote will go on.” It’s a lose lose.l and they realize this. 2 days of trying to strategize their way out of their nightmare TA and it all reverts back to do nothing. I believe they know the overwhelming negative feedback almost certainly means defeat. Here’s to looking forward to charting our new course forward…with a new MC and NC.
Reply
Old 07-06-2022 | 08:34 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,159
Likes: 1
Default

I have called 5 MEC reps. Only one has returned my call. The one I spoke to said he had over 80 calls and emails to make to his constituents. Limiting his calls to 2 minutes each. Swamped. The MEC Chair hasn't returned my call or my email. Classy guy.
Reply
Old 07-07-2022 | 01:55 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 2,032
Likes: 18
Default

Originally Posted by baseball
I have called 5 MEC reps. Only one has returned my call. The one I spoke to said he had over 80 calls and emails to make to his constituents. Limiting his calls to 2 minutes each. Swamped. The MEC Chair hasn't returned my call or my email. Classy guy.
When someone ******** in the punch bowl, the people at the party usually want answers. Crazy concept isn’t it?
Reply
Old 07-07-2022 | 02:47 AM
  #15  
Bestglide's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 535
Likes: 22
From: 756 left...
Default

Originally Posted by DwightSchrute
The argument for the C12 and other LEC no voters to vote yes on this is twofold…

1. there is a threat of company accusation of not “negotiating in good faith” if they torpedo their own deal and pull the TA and it’s vote (even though it’s a turd)…

2. perhaps due to (item 1) they believe that the best case scenario going forward is a resounding and overwhelmingly unified NO VOTE to send a message!

EVERYONE NEEDS TO VOTE NO TO THIS HORRIBLE CONCESSION-FILLED TURD! We must have a record and unified turnout!

They have stopped the town halls pushing it. It needs to die in this vote. Clean house and start over!
I haven’t flown with or know anyone that voted yes for the tumi-turd. These shysters…..I mean negotiators need to be recalled!
So we get a few pieces of silver thrown at us for massive concessions at a time we have the most leverage as pilots? I was never polled
or asked by any of these shysters what I wanted to see in a contract.
I hope this thing fails miserably and these want to be management sell outs leave in disgrace!
Reply
Old 07-07-2022 | 03:13 AM
  #16  
A320fumes's Avatar
Ben Salley
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
From: Left
Default voting to stay open.

Originally Posted by threeighteen
Nope. They actually did the right thing here. But now the membership needs to shoot it down hard and fire them anyway.

EXACTLY!

This was the wisest, and most legal step the MEC could have taken. The TA horse has left the barn, and now it’s up to the Pilots; if it passes it’s on us. How the TA got past the MEC will remain a problem to be addressed via the recall vehicle. The ratification responsibility rest solely with the Membership at this point.

Of course I’ll be roasted for this, but the MEC gets my respect for this message as they didn’t try to sell the TA; in fact, they actively stopped selling it last week.

Regarding this TA, we are where we are, irregardless of emotion. If it passes, it will be because our Pilot group passed it. If the TA fails, it will be because we rejected it.

Let’s fail this thing simply on its merits, or lack thereof. Once the TA threat is neutralized, then we hold leadership responsible for placing us in this position.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Last edited by A320fumes; 07-07-2022 at 03:41 AM.
Reply
Old 07-07-2022 | 03:17 AM
  #17  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,150
Likes: 9
Default

Originally Posted by A320fumes
EXACTLY!

This was the wisest, and most legal step the MEC could have taken. The TA horse has left the barn, and now it’s up to the Pilots; if it passes it’s on us. How the TA got past the MEC will remain a problem to be addressed via the recall vehicle. The ratification responsibility rest solely with the Membership at this point.

Of course I’ll be roasted for this, but the MEC gets my respect for this message as they didn’t try to sell the TA; in fact, they actively stopped selling it last week.

Regarding this TA, we are where we are, irregardless of emotion. If it passes, it will be because our Pilot group passed it. If the TA fails, it will be because we rejected it.

Let’s fail this thing simply on its merits, or lack thereof.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
it is still too little too late. I am still mesmerized how this TA came to be in the first place.

just amazing.
Reply
Old 07-07-2022 | 03:34 AM
  #18  
A320fumes's Avatar
Ben Salley
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
From: Left
Default voting to stay open.

Originally Posted by TFAYD
it is still too little too late. I am still mesmerized how this TA came to be in the first place.

just amazing.

So am I, but WE have larger issues right now, and it is ABSOLUTELY NOT TOO LATE. The reality of being a soldier is that sometimes Generals make horrible mistakes. When a General makes a mistake, effective soldiers first win the battle, then address the General. Effective soldiers don’t cry about why they were placed in a bad fighting position while the enemy is trying to kill them.

This TA is our primary threat. Kill it. After next week, sack the Generals.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Last edited by A320fumes; 07-07-2022 at 03:59 AM.
Reply
Old 07-07-2022 | 04:47 AM
  #19  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by A320fumes
So am I, but WE have larger issues right now, and it is ABSOLUTELY NOT TOO LATE. The reality of being a soldier is that sometimes Generals make horrible mistakes. When a General makes a mistake, effective soldiers first win the battle, then address the General. Effective soldiers don’t cry about why they were placed in a bad fighting position while the enemy is trying to kill them.

This TA is our primary threat. Kill it. After next week, sack the Generals.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Great post. Our focus right now needs to be on engaging our pilots with FACTS about why this is a bad deal. Sadly, there are many pilot who are still undecided and their only source of information in ALPA. We need to encourage them to read the forums and present them with facts that ALPA is conveniently withholding.

I’ve found that reading the red line document is more shocking than the bullet points. I am truly in shock at why the NC would agree to this deal.
Reply
Old 07-07-2022 | 06:06 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,112
Likes: 0
From: SFO Guppy CA
Default

The MEC did the only thing that they really could do. If you have understanding of the RLA, this shouldn’t surprise you at all. It is very likely that the Company communicated with the MEC and told them they had better continue the voting or they would make a complaint to the NMB. That would not be good for us!!!

So what do we do now? That’s simple…. We do what we’ve been trained to do. Handle the emergency by getting out the vote and voting no!!! If we have a resounding no vote, then that sends a very resounding message to both the Company and our representatives.

As has been stated earlier, if this thing passes, it’s on us!!! So let’s control what we can control!!!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
2dogs
Cargo
43
03-06-2012 11:47 AM
Old Herk GUy
Cargo
61
03-13-2008 02:15 PM
MD11Fr8Dog
Cargo
54
12-30-2007 12:24 AM
Fedex999999
Cargo
12
04-27-2007 05:44 AM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
0
09-28-2005 10:08 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices