Search

Notices

New Bases?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-19-2023 | 06:44 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2022
Posts: 855
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets
unless the company knows they have a location like MCO then I don’t see them ever opening another outstation base.
They fixed the captain problem, but that doesn't fix the where to park planes overnight problem. That (might) prompt a new base.
Reply
Old 12-19-2023 | 07:50 PM
  #12  
hummingbear's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,448
Likes: 6
Default

Originally Posted by Brickfire
They fixed the captain problem, but that doesn't fix the where to park planes overnight problem. That (might) prompt a new base.
I don’t understand how this keeps coming up as a rationale for new bases. On a typical trip I will park airplanes overnight at any number of airports that have no pilot base. Parking a plane overnight doesn’t require a pilot base- it requires tarmac & a hotel.
Reply
Old 12-20-2023 | 09:01 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2022
Posts: 855
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by hummingbear
Parking a plane overnight doesn’t require a pilot base- it requires tarmac & a hotel.
Not incorrect.

But at some scale, it make sense to avoid paying for X thousand hotel nights/year. And to have reserve coverage for all those AM departures. IDK what scale that is - I suspect for narrowbodies it's north of a dozen airplanes staying overnight. Which would mean something like a 5:30 and a 7:30 to every hub. Not many candidates ... the list of large airports/cities that are not already UA bases is Dallas, Philly, Atlanta, Phoenix, Boston, Detroit, Seattle, Minneapolis. Cities that aren't somebodies hub are the St. Louis, Nashville, New Orleans, Portland range. I agree none of those places make sense if you can grow your current bases. Question is how much growth can current bases support and how much it costs to open an outstation.
Reply
Old 12-20-2023 | 03:49 PM
  #14  
Excargodog's Avatar
Perennial Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 14,183
Likes: 238
Default

Originally Posted by Brickfire
Not incorrect.

But at some scale, it make sense to avoid paying for X thousand hotel nights/year. And to have reserve coverage for all those AM departures. IDK what scale that is - I suspect for narrowbodies it's north of a dozen airplanes staying overnight. Which would mean something like a 5:30 and a 7:30 to every hub. Not many candidates ... the list of large airports/cities that are not already UA bases is Dallas, Philly, Atlanta, Phoenix, Boston, Detroit, Seattle, Minneapolis. Cities that aren't somebodies hub are the St. Louis, Nashville, New Orleans, Portland range. I agree none of those places make sense if you can grow your current bases. Question is how much growth can current bases support and how much it costs to open an outstation.
Wouldn't count on Seattle. United HAD a base there for decades, but Alaska and Delta sort of shouldered them out.

https://www.seattletimes.com/busines...20of%20Seattle.
Reply
Old 12-20-2023 | 04:38 PM
  #15  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2021
Posts: 1,164
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
Wouldn't count on Seattle. United HAD a base there for decades, but Alaska and Delta sort of shouldered them out.

https://www.seattletimes.com/busines...20of%20Seattle.
LAS has been a disaster for them. MCO is basically just another CLE. They need EWR to become more efficient badly but that’s unlikely.
Reply
Old 12-20-2023 | 05:08 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2022
Posts: 855
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
Wouldn't count on Seattle. United HAD a base there for decades, but Alaska and Delta sort of shouldered them out.
I don't seen anywhere else becoming a passenger connection hub for united.
But let's say Nashville, for arguments sake, had the following flights at 0600 and 0800

EWR
IAD
IAH
ORD
LAX
SFO
MCO

That's 14 planes parked overnight. That's the sort of operation that _might_ make sense to have a pilot base especially if you need somewhere to park planes at night.
And yes you could also buy 10,220 hotel rooms/year to suppor that operation.
Reply
Old 12-20-2023 | 07:56 PM
  #17  
New Hire
 
Joined: Oct 2023
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by LAXtoDEN
LAS has been a disaster for them. MCO is basically just another CLE. They need EWR to become more efficient badly but that’s unlikely.
Why has LAS been a disaster for UAL? And isn't MCO expanding...making it a little better than CLE.
Reply
Old 12-21-2023 | 05:01 AM
  #18  
Chowdah's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
Default

One of the main objectives of new crew domiciles was a recruitment tool for new pilots. The hiring team knows that the contracts at the big three are similar enough that people will go to the airline that has a domicile where they live. I think that had as much weight as operational reliability, and overnighting cost.

Given that this experiment seems to be on the back-burner at this point, I think that Las Vegas showed that it did not quite pan out the way they had hoped and with the new contract’s forced upgrades, filling CA seats was possibly an even higher objective
Reply
Old 12-21-2023 | 06:17 AM
  #19  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jul 2022
Posts: 71
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Brickfire
Not incorrect.

But at some scale, it make sense to avoid paying for X thousand hotel nights/year. And to have reserve coverage for all those AM departures. IDK what scale that is - I suspect for narrowbodies it's north of a dozen airplanes staying overnight. Which would mean something like a 5:30 and a 7:30 to every hub. Not many candidates ... the list of large airports/cities that are not already UA bases is Dallas, Philly, Atlanta, Phoenix, Boston, Detroit, Seattle, Minneapolis. Cities that aren't somebodies hub are the St. Louis, Nashville, New Orleans, Portland range. I agree none of those places make sense if you can grow your current bases. Question is how much growth can current bases support and how much it costs to open an outstation.
FWIW, it is SUPER cheap to park a 121 plane overnight at MCO. Something like $80.
Reply
Old 12-21-2023 | 06:29 AM
  #20  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,020
Likes: 23
From: It's a plane and it's a seat
Default

Originally Posted by LAXtoDEN
LAS has been a disaster for them. MCO is basically just another CLE. They need EWR to become more efficient badly but that’s unlikely.

Que, the resident UAL hater. Please explain to us UAL guys what makes LAS a disaster? Inquiring minds want to know.

you really should’ve limited the amount of koolaid your consumed while at SKW
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
popNfresh
United
24
08-14-2023 12:09 PM
RiddleEagle18
Regional
30
12-03-2022 01:55 PM
H60 DUSTOFF
JetBlue
1590
07-01-2022 03:10 PM
Shammy
United
116
12-17-2021 06:26 PM
johnson48
Fractional
20
04-15-2008 02:15 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices