Search

Notices

7.6379

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-28-2025 | 05:05 AM
  #181  
crewdawg's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,418
Likes: 417
Default

Originally Posted by jerryleber
777/787 CA = 1,576/172 WB = 9.2 CA/WB
777/787 FO = 2,772/172 WB = 16.1 FO/WB
777/787 pilots = 25.3 pilots/WB

330/350 CA = 1,373/109 WB = 12.6 CA/WB
330/350 FO = 2,059/109 WB = 18.9 FO/WB
330/350 pilots = 31.5 Pilot/WB


Originally Posted by KnightNight
Pretty close, you’d have to factor in how many of those WB are domestic only, which is a 1/1 ratio 🤣

I think that's why our staffing ratio is a bit higher, DAL almost never uses the 330/350 on domestic flying with any regularity. Now if we could just get our WB count up close to yours.
Reply
Old 02-28-2025 | 05:24 AM
  #182  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
Default

So, in summation Delta has better manning than UAL(from pilot perspective) by about 20-25% on WB.

If you're a Delta pilot you want more WB with same manning.

If you're a UAL pilot you want Delta's work rules thus increasing manning by about 20-25%.

That about correct for this whizzing contest?
Reply
Old 02-28-2025 | 05:31 AM
  #183  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 378
Likes: 31
Default

Originally Posted by Race Bannon
That about correct for this whizzing contest?
No, this doesn't fit my narrative that my airline is better than everyone else's.
Reply
Old 02-28-2025 | 05:33 AM
  #184  
crewdawg's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,418
Likes: 417
Default

Originally Posted by Race Bannon
So, in summation Delta has better manning than UAL(from pilot perspective) by about 20-25% on WB.

If you're a Delta pilot you want more WB with same manning.

If you're a UAL pilot you want Delta's work rules thus increasing manning by about 20-25%.

That about correct for this whizzing contest?

I don't see it so much as a whizzing contest as it's just some interesting data for both sides. I'd be happy at either airline as long as I could live in base. Certainly not for me, I left WB FO for 717 CA and don't plan on leaving any time soon lol.
Reply
Old 02-28-2025 | 05:54 AM
  #185  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by crewdawg
I don't see it so much as a whizzing contest as it's just some interesting data for both sides.
Oh, I whole heartedly agree. I too thought it was an interesting discussion, and facts were needed. Unfortunately, too many here were intent on stiffling discussion by utilizing the time honored stereotype of "Hey you condescending, egotistical Delta pilots go back to you own forum".

Now that the facts are out there both sided know where to put priorities during next contract negotiations.

UAL holds the upper hand here because pilots(negotiatiors ) can influence the manning formula side of the equation much more readily than they can company purchasing decisions.

Not a jab, just statement of fact from my perspective.
Reply
Old 02-28-2025 | 06:03 AM
  #186  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2024
Posts: 444
Likes: 88
Default

Originally Posted by crewdawg
I don't see it so much as a whizzing contest as it's just some interesting data for both sides. I'd be happy at either airline as long as I could live in base. Certainly not for me, I left WB FO for 717 CA and don't plan on leaving any time soon lol.
More interesting data from the United side is that the IRO positions are separate lines. That means flying guys can get bought off for IOE (not just bumped to IRO), and IRO’s can run out of landings, and get paid for the trip while the do a day of landings sims.

Overall I think it ends up being a wash between the two. I tell new guys to pick the one that has a base they want to live in.
Reply
Old 02-28-2025 | 07:41 AM
  #187  
ClappedOut145's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2020
Posts: 1,124
Likes: 70
From: AOG
Default

Originally Posted by AF OneWire
More interesting data from the United side is that the IRO positions are separate lines. That means flying guys can get bought off for IOE (not just bumped to IRO), and IRO’s can run out of landings, and get paid for the trip while the do a day of landings sims.

Overall I think it ends up being a wash between the two. I tell new guys to pick the one that has a base they want to live in.
I live our bidding for your seat system. I don’t want to go to work having to fight for a landing. I lived that life before and it’s crappy. I know every month how many landings I will get. If you can’t hold the flying seat then I suggest trying to be more senior. ;-)
Reply
Old 02-28-2025 | 07:48 AM
  #188  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Apr 2024
Posts: 154
Likes: 12
Default

Originally Posted by ClappedOut145
I live our bidding for your seat system. I don’t want to go to work having to fight for a landing. I lived that life before and it’s crappy. I know every month how many landings I will get. If you can’t hold the flying seat then I suggest trying to be more senior.
In the world of FAR 117 and regulated inflight rest, how can an airline get away with not having scheduled flying and IRO positions. You're going to blast off on a 12+ hour flight departing around midnight and you don't know if you'll be in the bunk or flying seat for the first half? Crazy that's allowed.
Reply
Old 02-28-2025 | 11:07 AM
  #189  
ClappedOut145's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2020
Posts: 1,124
Likes: 70
From: AOG
Default

Originally Posted by FlyPanAm
In the world of FAR 117 and regulated inflight rest, how can an airline get away with not having scheduled flying and IRO positions. You're going to blast off on a 12+ hour flight departing around midnight and you don't know if you'll be in the bunk or flying seat for the first half? Crazy that's allowed.
You sign in fit for duty. What’s hard about that? Usually crews on the 777/787 talk to each other beforehand and the flying captain will determine how the breaks will be laid out. Plan your rest before duty in advance to work around that plan.
Reply
Old 02-28-2025 | 11:21 AM
  #190  
Line Holder
10M Airline Miles
5 Years
100 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 54
Default

Originally Posted by ClappedOut145
You sign in fit for duty. What’s hard about that? Usually crews on the 777/787 talk to each other beforehand and the flying captain will determine how the breaks will be laid out. Plan your rest before duty in advance to work around that plan.
Crews “usually talking to each other” isn’t required or expected wrt FAR compliance. The fact is if you come to work expecting to get first(or second)break, and have managed your rest accordingly, it shouldn’t be upended by the skipper at the briefing. Picking a flying vs non flying line is a far superior method of bidding to just showing up and hoping it works out.
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices