![]() |
Originally Posted by SoFloFlyer
(Post 4027618)
Safe to say that only ones that want the merger are B6 pilots. No one at UA would want that
|
Originally Posted by 11atsomto
(Post 4027945)
I don’t think that too many jetBlue pilots are hoping for an acquisitio…and I think all United pilots want our JFK slots ...
Most pilots based in EWR either live in PA or NJ or commute. I can't imagine anyone wanting to now have to drive past EWR to get to JFK or commute offline to JFK to start/end a trip unless they live right near the airport. If they aren't on the Airbus it won't matter because that's the plane that going to be flying in and out of there (for now) and nobody is going to give up their WB job just to fly domestic transcons. |
Originally Posted by FriendlyPilot
(Post 4027976)
I have not heard one pilot here say they "want JFK slots". Maybe some legacy United people living in Long Island that are driving to EWR now but other than that its not widely talked about at all. Only thing management has ever said about JFK is bringing back the Premium Service flights and building out existing hubs. The current focus is ORD, DEN and IAH with some increase in WB flights as new 787s are being delivered. Not trying to start a new hub from scratch in super competitive JFK where you are now competing with every airline in the world, including Delta and AA. If anything that's a reason to NOT try and hub there.
Most pilots based in EWR either live in PA or NJ or commute. I can't imagine anyone wanting to now have to drive past EWR to get to JFK or commute offline to JFK to start/end a trip unless they live right near the airport. If they aren't on the Airbus it won't matter because that's the plane that going to be flying in and out of there (for now) and nobody is going to give up their WB job just to fly domestic transcons. |
Originally Posted by JoePatroni
(Post 4027980)
This. If it ever happened, I would imagine those trips would be flown out of the SFO and LAX bases, a trip that started in JFK would be a sick call bonanza in EWR.
Bingo. It would go just like BWI - flown by other base pilots. |
Originally Posted by khergan
(Post 4028014)
Bingo. It would go just like BWI - flown by other base pilots.
|
Originally Posted by ThumbsUp
(Post 4028023)
EWR320 is a little bit of a different animal. I think there are a significant portion of Airbus folks that are happy that we will be flying out of JFK whether that's because they live closer (CT, NY) there or it's an easier commute.
I guess we will see. Who knows. |
Originally Posted by khergan
(Post 4028014)
Bingo. It would go just like BWI - flown by other base pilots.
Those JFK trips will likely be crewed by LAX/SFO Airbus crews |
Originally Posted by Swakid8
(Post 4028117)
BWI trips were desirable by a select few DC pilots (those closer to BWI)…. Company stopped building them in the bid packages to avoid crosstown pay and use PP to fix broken trips that touched BWI..
Those JFK trips will likely be crewed by LAX/SFO Airbus crews |
Originally Posted by Bluediver
(Post 4028191)
Maybe the bar should be set in the CBA where EWR and JFK are separate bases or they must provide DH transportation or in the case of LGA they reimburse transport from JFK, like we have.
These are generally narrowbody problems, since all the WB are in EWR. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:40 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands