Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
Realistic Recall for UAL 07/08 Hires >

Realistic Recall for UAL 07/08 Hires

Search
Notices

Realistic Recall for UAL 07/08 Hires

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-01-2010, 09:11 PM
  #21  
Not retiring avatar
 
Monkeyfly's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2010
Position: 777 CAP
Posts: 768
Default Dear Captain Sunshine

Originally Posted by oncea57cap View Post
Kinda thing people said when I said this -http://www.airlinepilotforums.com/cal-ual-merger/52295-new-united-assumes-70-seat-plus-scope-2.html#post845500
Well, we all kind of knew/assumed about the Furloughees being recalled to the CAL side. But can you tell me why it was like pulling teeth just to get this relatively benign TPA? And why you have so much faith in airline management to all of a sudden have this done by Oct. 5? And whether you are willing to take my bet that it will not?
Monkeyfly is offline  
Old 08-02-2010, 03:01 AM
  #22  
Fore!
 
Tony Nelson's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: 756 F/O
Posts: 505
Default

Originally Posted by Thunder1 View Post
Oncea57Cap and Contrail67:

I hope you both are correct on your optimistic timeline for the UA furloughees. I'm a 2008 new-hire furloughee and look forward to returning to the newly merged United.
Do either of you know if longevity/seniority would accrue for a pilot that bypasses recall due to military commitment even though I was still on probation when furloughed and I assume will still be on probation when I return?
Thanks.

Thunder1
Thunder1,
Just semantics, but you don't accrue longevity if you bypass. If you bypass, you are still furloughed. Accept a recall and then go on military leave. You accrue longevity/seniority/B/C fund while on Mil leave.
Tony Nelson is offline  
Old 08-02-2010, 04:02 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
contrail67's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: 737
Posts: 590
Default

Originally Posted by Monkeyfly View Post
Well, we all kind of knew/assumed about the Furloughees being recalled to the CAL side. But can you tell me why it was like pulling teeth just to get this relatively benign TPA? And why you have so much faith in airline management to all of a sudden have this done by Oct. 5? And whether you are willing to take my bet that it will not?

Try and get the merger through without a JCBA and then get the shareholders to agree to that....no way. That is why.
contrail67 is offline  
Old 08-02-2010, 06:05 AM
  #24  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Mar 2010
Posts: 28
Default

Originally Posted by contrail67 View Post
Try and get the merger through without a JCBA and then get the shareholders to agree to that....no way. That is why.
The shareholder's vote is scheduled for late September. So whether we get a JCBA at the end date of the ultra aggresive negotiating timeline in the Transition Agreement or not, the shareholder's vote will have already taken place.

Besides, the shareholder's vote will be controlled by the small group of stakeholders (managers of mutual funds, pension funds, large private equity, etc.). Do you really believe that management has not already had conversations with these individuals and sufficently addressed any concerns they may have had? IMO, you seem to placing a lot of faith in process that I consider to be a mere formality.

The only remote chance of this merger not going through will come from DOT/DOJ rejection. Of course, the only thing they care about is maintaining competition and the resultant low fares for consumers.
2wright is offline  
Old 08-02-2010, 06:21 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Posts: 363
Default

I'm not sure I'd hold my breath on a JCBA anytime soon. Mgmt gets paid regardless of whether we get a JCBA. Signing this TTA makes it appear to Wall Street as though we are on our way to fully integrating, but I think our contract expectations are quite a bit higher than DL/NW (and rightfully so, BTW). Makes it easy for mgmt to walk away and say we are being "unreasonable", after they have already gotten all of their shares and bonuses.

UAL mgmt in particular will not give up a dime for it's employees unless it somehow gets a dollar back. I've been living in this movie scene for far too long. Hope I'm wrong.
kc135driver is offline  
Old 08-02-2010, 07:32 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Position: UAL FO
Posts: 122
Default

Originally Posted by oncea57cap View Post
Yes, longevity and seniority accrue for you while on mil leave, but the point is kinda moot since longevity will be restored for all furloughees when the JCBA is complete this fall.
are you saying that us furloughees will come back at whatever year pay as if we were never furloughed ? (I think DAL got that in their joint contract)
WS01 is offline  
Old 08-02-2010, 07:42 AM
  #27  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: May 2010
Posts: 46
Default

Originally Posted by Monkeyfly View Post
Well, we all kind of knew/assumed about the Furloughees being recalled to the CAL side. But can you tell me why it was like pulling teeth just to get this relatively benign TPA? And why you have so much faith in airline management to all of a sudden have this done by Oct. 5? And whether you are willing to take my bet that it will not?
Well, it's easy for anyone to say now, "yeah I knew that too', but whatever. As for your other question, there are many reasons, but here is the most important. Normally, it is in managements' interest to delay a contract - for obvious reasons. Not in this case. In this case it may be best for us to wait a while. Here are the numbers. Conservative estimates of the net revenue synergy are 4 - 5 billion based on current economic conditions. If management gives the pilots a 25% rasie (not nearly enough or fair by any corporate metric) it is only 6% of that additional revenue. Now if you listen to top economists (not the talking head jackasses on CNBC) we are in a 1983 scenario - the beginning of a roaring economy (which, incidentally, management believes) then that additional revenue could be as much as double. If management waits and delays that would only cost them more as employees start to see the giant profits rolling in and demand more. So the JCBA will be complete unusually fast (that should raise red flags in and of itself), we'll get 25% and a stake in the new company, work rules will be restored, scope will be restored and management will laugh all the way to the bank. Fact!
oncea57cap is offline  
Old 08-02-2010, 08:05 AM
  #28  
Smells like teen spirit
 
scrapdog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Mil and Civ
Posts: 216
Default

Originally Posted by WS01 View Post
are you saying that us furloughees will come back at whatever year pay as if we were never furloughed ? (I think DAL got that in their joint contract)
From my understanding, you come back @ your last pay rate (i.e. a 2000 furloughee would come back to 10 year pay), but your seniority would be in the pecking order based on your recall.
scrapdog is offline  
Old 08-02-2010, 08:06 AM
  #29  
Smells like teen spirit
 
scrapdog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Mil and Civ
Posts: 216
Default

Originally Posted by kc135driver View Post
UAL mgmt in particular will not give up a dime for it's employees unless it somehow gets a dollar back. I've been living in this movie scene for far too long. Hope I'm wrong.
UAL management is not running the show of the merged airline, CAL managment is. There are some UAL folks in management staffing, but CAL management is at the top. FYI
scrapdog is offline  
Old 08-02-2010, 08:09 AM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: Cap. 737
Posts: 293
Default

If you are talking about UAL furloughees, then it is the pay rate at which you left (for instance, a 99' hire would come back at 7th or 8th year pay-adjusted for furlough time, we didn't accrue seniority for pay while furloughed). We can bypass and still keep our seniority, we just wouldn't accrue it for pay purposes until we are back. Been there, got the t-shirt......
SKMarz is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Riddler
Military
959
08-04-2010 09:17 PM
imbroke
Regional
395
08-26-2009 10:32 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices