Search

Notices

CAL System Bid

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-05-2010 | 01:06 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,512
Likes: 0
From: 787 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by A320fumes
I hope you are wrong. Having UAL furloughees at the bottom of our list would be good for SLIntegration.

What do you mean?
Reply
Old 09-05-2010 | 01:31 PM
  #22  
Sonny Crockett's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 590
Likes: 3
From: B777
Default

Originally Posted by SUPERfluf
I hope I'm wrong too. For the SLI and it would be nice to see Tilton's victims back in a cockpit.

There is a rumor floating around that some of the senior UAL furloughees have been contacted......

Complete RUMOR!

I know some guys at the top of that list....no call.
Reply
Old 09-05-2010 | 01:59 PM
  #23  
JMD16's Avatar
work nights and weekends
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
From: United SFO B-737
Default

Originally Posted by Sonny Crockett
Complete RUMOR!

I know some guys at the top of that list....no call.
I am near the top of the list and there have been no letters or calls.
Reply
Old 09-06-2010 | 05:20 AM
  #24  
EWRflyr's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,980
Likes: 15
From: 737 CAPT
Default

Originally Posted by JMD16
I am near the top of the list and there have been no letters or calls.
And I wouldn't expect there to be any letters or calls to United pilots until Continental manpower planning finishes the bid, awards the positions, contacts our furloughees to see if they are coming back, and then determines how many positions they have left to fill.

As I said before, just running the combined numbers from this bid and the last bid, IF all our furloughed pilots return, that will leave unfilled vacancies after this bid is awarded. According to those pesky "rumors" again, the company expects only about 70-80 of our furloughed pilots to return (have always questioned why they know this or how they come up with this number, esp. in this economy). If that is true, then there could be more opportunities for more of our furloughed United brothers and sisters.
Reply
Old 09-07-2010 | 08:22 AM
  #25  
luv757's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 534
Likes: 15
From: 18%er but I’ll enforce UPA23 to the last period.
Default

Originally Posted by JMD16
I am near the top of the list and there have been no letters or calls.
Since you are on a voluntary furlough, would that play a part? Obviously this is academic at this point since it is clearly an incorrect rumor that anyone has been contacted. That leads to another question, I assume other UA guys are on a voluntary furlough so are they contacted in seniority order for any vacancies or is it the involuntary guys only?

Originally Posted by EWRflyr
And I wouldn't expect there to be any letters or calls to United pilots until Continental manpower planning finishes the bid, awards the positions, contacts our furloughees to see if they are coming back, and then determines how many positions they have left to fill.

As I said before, just running the combined numbers from this bid and the last bid, IF all our furloughed pilots return, that will leave unfilled vacancies after this bid is awarded. According to those pesky "rumors" again, the company expects only about 70-80 of our furloughed pilots to return (have always questioned why they know this or how they come up with this number, esp. in this economy). If that is true, then there could be more opportunities for more of our furloughed United brothers and sisters.
Even if every one of our guys returns that still means at a minimum 12 UAL guys should be extended the chance to return to work at CAL. 15 vacancies in May, 145 now is 160 total with 148 furloughed. At a minimum the top 12 UA guys on furlough have (or should have) the chance at a training date.
Reply
Old 09-07-2010 | 08:35 AM
  #26  
SUPERfluf's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
From: 737 CA
Default

Originally Posted by luv757
...Even if every one of our guys returns that still means at a minimum 12 UAL guys should be extended the chance to return to work at CAL. 15 vacancies in May, 145 now is 160 total with 148 furloughed. At a minimum the top 12 UA guys on furlough have (or should have) the chance at a training date.
The staffing min numbers set the vacancies on this bid at 133. 133 + 15 = 148.

Strange coincidence? Maybe. While I hope we staff the maximum and return as many pilots to work as possible, CAL mgmt is not magnanimous.

Of course, there is the rumor that they are anticipating 1/2 of the CAL furloughs to bypass. Also swirling around in the mix is how many on COLA will choose to extend (and convert to a more punitive LOA)?

So while we may bring some UAL furloughs over, I'm not sure I would set a 'minimum' number just yet.
Reply
Old 09-10-2010 | 11:31 AM
  #27  
Rocketiii's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by SUPERfluf
That's probably the minimum amount of pilots that we need but CAL mgmt must cringe at having to pay UAL furloughees their last pay rate AND medical benefits for the first 6 months. So the bid was most likely delayed while they figured out how to make things work with 40 less pilots.

I think they will go as long as they possibly can without bringing on any additional pilots.

Even when we get a JCBA, I bet there will be target dates for the implementation of the work rules on the CAL side of the house so that they can stretch out the hiring required to make up for the staffing increase.

I think that is actually a problem. Now the following statement has nothing to do with goodwill, etc. But buy allowing UAL furloughs to be hired on I can see some negative consequences to the CAL bottom line. CAL will pay out of its coffers the last years pay of the UAL pilots, including all during indoc and training while they are not producing, medical, etc, training and providing types if necessary and including them in the pool of profit sharing. Something to think about. Glad they will be part of the combined company, but I see it only as an act of goodwill. I see no return and actually the same pilots that take the offer may still complain that they MAY be integrated below the CAL furloughs that have just been recalled on paper. Flame away
Reply
Old 09-10-2010 | 11:44 AM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,213
Likes: 14
From: guppy CA
Default

Originally Posted by Rocketiii
I think that is actually a problem. Now the following statement has nothing to do with goodwill, etc. But buy allowing UAL furloughs to be hired on I can see some negative consequences to the CAL bottom line. CAL will pay out of its coffers the last years pay of the UAL pilots, including all during indoc and training while they are not producing, medical, etc, training and providing types if necessary and including them in the pool of profit sharing. Something to think about. Glad they will be part of the combined company, but I see it only as an act of goodwill. I see no return and actually the same pilots that take the offer may still complain that they MAY be integrated below the CAL furloughs that have just been recalled on paper. Flame away
A lot of us who have been furloughed twice are very unhappy with UALALPA. If there is any concern among CALALPA of being pushed around by the larger UALALPA after integration, any goodwill shown by CALALPA toward us would result in many of us being more loyal to CALALPA.
A few burning issues:
1) C2003 increased pilot flying hours by ~20%, leaving a lot of us on the streets for an extra couple of years.
2) Unlimited 70 seat RJs.
3) No longevity credit for furlough time.
4) The post-BK bond distribution. Those still on the street at the time of distribution received nothing.
There are more; those are just the ones that come to mind at this time.

I'll refrain from commenting publicly on SLI and what I expect UALALPA to do to those of us still on furlough.
Reply
Old 09-10-2010 | 01:03 PM
  #29  
Coto Pilot's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
Default

I see no return and actually the same pilots that take the offer may still complain that they MAY be integrated below the CAL furloughs that have just been recalled on paper. Flame away [/quote]

So an 11 year United pilot that goes to the bottom of Continentals list should waive his rights to be integrated into the combined list? Really? The new "United" will be paying for any additional cost associated with hiring a furloughed United pilot, not CAL ALPA. I'll self censor and stop there....
Reply
Old 09-10-2010 | 03:07 PM
  #30  
ualratt's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Rocketiii
I think that is actually a problem. Now the following statement has nothing to do with goodwill, etc. But buy allowing UAL furloughs to be hired on I can see some negative consequences to the CAL bottom line. CAL will pay out of its coffers the last years pay of the UAL pilots, including all during indoc and training while they are not producing, medical, etc, training and providing types if necessary and including them in the pool of profit sharing. Something to think about. Glad they will be part of the combined company, but I see it only as an act of goodwill. I see no return and actually the same pilots that take the offer may still complain that they MAY be integrated below the CAL furloughs that have just been recalled on paper. Flame away
Hey Joe Blow quit knocking your scalp to come up with such bullchit. Ever thought to match Smisek's commitment to no base salary until the company turns a profit? Consider it you "sorry self"!! You're probably thinking that somehow you are a burden on the company coffers as well, don't you?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
directgomup
Major
32
01-17-2010 02:54 PM
ERJ Jay
Union Talk
0
10-03-2009 10:36 AM
FlyinPiker
Frontier
40
08-05-2009 07:14 PM
brownie
Cargo
7
05-27-2009 06:50 PM
fr8rcaptain
Cargo
0
05-12-2009 03:20 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices