![]() |
Originally Posted by iahflyr
(Post 896958)
....That comment about all the problem coming from subcontractors is just some union wrench turner who is mad because his overpaid union job got outsourced to someone who can do it cheaper and better.
Labor unions need to be careful to not set their wages outside of what the market will bear, otherwise their jobs will go away. The UAW is a perfect example. Unions should be there to support their employee's, not demand ridiculous wages. They are having to re-work almost every horizontal stab they have received from them. They are planning to bring the manufacture of the horizontal stab in house for the 787-900. While Italy is a bad example of low cost non-union competition (they're just as unionized and unproductive as France), how are workers who live in America (and have the associated higher cost of living) supposed to set their wages to what a global market can bear? The cost of living in China, India, SE Asia.....etc prices American workers out of the market. What then is the answer? Outsource everything? All American workers live in mud huts and eat rice so we can work for the same wages as the Chinese? We now build hardly anything because of this globalization BS. In the end, the entire country is weaker for it. What is the solution? I have no idea, but its not so black and white that unions are exclusively the problem. |
Originally Posted by SUPERfluf
(Post 897035)
how are workers who live in America (and have the associated higher cost of living) supposed to set their wages to what a global market can bear?
Have you ever seen what Boeing assembly workers make? Full on pension... WAY TOO MUCH COMPENSATION to do a non-skilled job. Toyota has no problem using American workers. They are non-union and as a result they get paid what they deserve. What the US market will bear. If the UAW was the union at Toyota's plant, they would ship those jobs overseas in a heartbeat. I don't think unions are horrible. But when unions set their wages outside of what the market will bear, they are asking for trouble. They get NO sympathy from me. |
Originally Posted by iahflyr
(Post 897062)
They don't have to bring their wages down to the level of China, etc... They just have to not set their wages outside of what the US market would bear.
Have you ever seen what Boeing assembly workers make? Full on pension... WAY TOO MUCH COMPENSATION to do a non-skilled job. Toyota has no problem using American workers. They are non-union and as a result they get paid what they deserve. What the US market will bear. If the UAW was the union at Toyota's plant, they would ship those jobs overseas in a heartbeat. I don't think unions are horrible. But when unions set their wages outside of what the market will bear, they are asking for trouble. They get NO sympathy from me. at UAL was too much. :eek: |
Originally Posted by REAL Pilot
(Post 895087)
Did you get that golden AD retirement yet? Defense money is drying up (AFRC anyway) as the social costs are escalating. Go figure.........
"The Chief, Air Force Reserve, under authority granted by SAF/OS, has authorized the continuation of the Reduced Time In Grade (TIG) requirement for Air Force Reserve Lieutenant Colonels and Colonels desiring to retire in FY11." Timing is everything. No big deal; I'm getting paid retirement as an O-5 with a bit more than 23 yrs. I haven't started to look for work yet. My wife (on active duty) said that all AF Reserve mandays were cancelled for FY11 to do an A-10 refurbishment. Nice. Get ready for massive cutbacks in Defense manpower and budgets. |
Originally Posted by Andy
(Post 894653)
Between the two furloughs, I'm over 6 1/2 years furloughed since being hired June 2000.
On the trust issue, I rank ordered my trust prior to the merger: 1 CAL MEC 2 CAL management 3 UAL management 4 UAL MEC I doubt that I'm alone in that assessment. Just don't ask me about: Increasing every pilot's hours to offset paycuts in C2003 (added a couple of years to my first furlough) Unlimited RJs; Whiteford had approval from the rest of UAL's MEC. Age 65 and how that extends our current furloughs The division of the convertible note. Side note for 2172ers - retired pilots received $44M from UALALPA; any chance of starting a lawsuit against UALALPA? United Airlines pilots union to pay $44M to settle lawsuit by some members | Law | Crain's Chicago Business |
Originally Posted by iahflyr
(Post 897062)
They don't have to bring their wages down to the level of China, etc... They just have to not set their wages outside of what the US market would bear.
Have you ever seen what Boeing assembly workers make? Full on pension... WAY TOO MUCH COMPENSATION to do a non-skilled job. Toyota has no problem using American workers. They are non-union and as a result they get paid what they deserve. What the US market will bear. If the UAW was the union at Toyota's plant, they would ship those jobs overseas in a heartbeat. I don't think unions are horrible. But when unions set their wages outside of what the market will bear, they are asking for trouble. They get NO sympathy from me. |
Originally Posted by Shrek
(Post 897129)
Let me guess......you thought that C2000
at UAL was too much. :eek: I think C2000 at UAL is way too much for 2010. |
Serious thread drift. Maybe start another to discuss unions. I am interested in CAL recall classes and thoughts on when or if CAL will bring UAL furloughed pilots to CAL.
|
Originally Posted by JMD16
(Post 897477)
Serious thread drift. Maybe start another to discuss unions. I am interested in CAL recall classes and thoughts on when or if CAL will bring UAL furloughed pilots to CAL.
Thanks to those who have been updating this thread with CAL recall and class information. SP |
I'm about 15 or so from the bottom, I'll let you guys know when I hear something. I'm taking military leave, so I'm not 100% sure they will give me an official training notification, or if I will just have my status updated online. I'm expecting late Feb or March.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:52 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands