UAL MEC message - 11/1/10
#12
Banded or unbanded pay rates will, I would think, have very little affect the average pilot during the SLI. Most pilots I know believe the list will go to binding arbitration and they will fall within 1-2% on the new list as they are on their current list. Two MECs fighting over compensation does not bode well for anyone.
#13
New Hire
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
If UAL is saying they will NOT rely on JCBA wage rates as a basis for SLI integration then what is CALs problem...someone explain why CAL MEC "has refused our repeated requests for a similar agreement". Who gives a crap what the 747s make..they will not be used for SLI and will probably be gone before too long anyway. This is insane!
#14
If UAL is saying they will NOT rely on JCBA wage rates as a basis for SLI integration then what is CALs problem...someone explain why CAL MEC "has refused our repeated requests for a similar agreement". Who gives a crap what the 747s make..they will not be used for SLI and will probably be gone before too long anyway. This is insane!
#17
I would think they could establish a pre-JCBA "snapshot" of our payrates/bands (just like seniority lists) for purposes of the SLI that ignored 747/777 payrates in the JCBA. Then the expectations argument cannot use the new rates.
I would also think separate pay benefits everyone once we get beyond the SLI issues...though, maybe not a whole lot if the whale goes away...
Pay banding is a concessionary era development, is it not?
#18
So the JNC passed sxn 3 to the MEC's, and the MEC's have received proposals on everything (incl sxn 3) from the company. Have the MEC's agreed on sxn 3? It sounds like not...
#20
I'm all for the 747's being paid the highest as long as there aren't any fences around them. 
What that letter doesn't address is that the UAL MEC passed a resolution mandating that it pay the highest, not the other way around. As far as I know the joint NC came up with an agreed upon section 3 and the UAL MEC shot it down, not CAL's.
Facts are a tricky thing as my buddy Coto likes to point out.

What that letter doesn't address is that the UAL MEC passed a resolution mandating that it pay the highest, not the other way around. As far as I know the joint NC came up with an agreed upon section 3 and the UAL MEC shot it down, not CAL's.
Facts are a tricky thing as my buddy Coto likes to point out.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



