Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
UAL MEC message - 11/1/10 >

UAL MEC message - 11/1/10

Search

Notices

UAL MEC message - 11/1/10

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-01-2010 | 10:45 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Default

I just want to get this done so we can all benefit from a better contract asap. We(CAL) need the better work rules in a bad way while we ALL need the hourly wages to return to UAL 2000 rates.
Reply
Old 11-01-2010 | 10:46 AM
  #12  
JMD16's Avatar
work nights and weekends
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
From: United SFO B-737
Default

Banded or unbanded pay rates will, I would think, have very little affect the average pilot during the SLI. Most pilots I know believe the list will go to binding arbitration and they will fall within 1-2% on the new list as they are on their current list. Two MECs fighting over compensation does not bode well for anyone.
Reply
Old 11-01-2010 | 10:58 AM
  #13  
New Hire
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Default

If UAL is saying they will NOT rely on JCBA wage rates as a basis for SLI integration then what is CALs problem...someone explain why CAL MEC "has refused our repeated requests for a similar agreement". Who gives a crap what the 747s make..they will not be used for SLI and will probably be gone before too long anyway. This is insane!
Reply
Old 11-01-2010 | 11:27 AM
  #14  
A320fumes's Avatar
Ben Salley
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
From: Left
Default

Originally Posted by Catfish304
If UAL is saying they will NOT rely on JCBA wage rates as a basis for SLI integration then what is CALs problem...someone explain why CAL MEC "has refused our repeated requests for a similar agreement". Who gives a crap what the 747s make..they will not be used for SLI and will probably be gone before too long anyway. This is insane!
The UAL MEC and the CAL MEC. If each didn't deem it germane to the SLI process, it wouldn't be an issue. Just ask the banded B-747/777 guys @ DAL, vs. the unbanded A-330 top 500 pilots @ USAirways.
Reply
Old 11-01-2010 | 11:53 AM
  #15  
SUPERfluf's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
From: 737 CA
Default

Funny how there's no mention that the JOINT negotiating commitee has come up with a section 3 proposal that they agree on?
Reply
Old 11-01-2010 | 12:30 PM
  #16  
JMD16's Avatar
work nights and weekends
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
From: United SFO B-737
Default

Believe that it was stated in earlier communications that the JNC had passed on to the MECs their section 3 plan.
Reply
Old 11-01-2010 | 12:32 PM
  #17  
dumpcheck's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by SUPERfluf
Funny how there's no mention that the JOINT negotiating commitee has come up with a section 3 proposal that they agree on?
My thoughts as well...though I guess the company could have given us proposals on everything without us actually giving the company a section 3 proposal first?

I would think they could establish a pre-JCBA "snapshot" of our payrates/bands (just like seniority lists) for purposes of the SLI that ignored 747/777 payrates in the JCBA. Then the expectations argument cannot use the new rates.

I would also think separate pay benefits everyone once we get beyond the SLI issues...though, maybe not a whole lot if the whale goes away...
Pay banding is a concessionary era development, is it not?
Reply
Old 11-01-2010 | 12:34 PM
  #18  
dumpcheck's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by JMD16
Believe that it was stated in earlier communications that the JNC had passed on to the MECs their section 3 plan.
So the JNC passed sxn 3 to the MEC's, and the MEC's have received proposals on everything (incl sxn 3) from the company. Have the MEC's agreed on sxn 3? It sounds like not...
Reply
Old 11-01-2010 | 01:26 PM
  #19  
JMD16's Avatar
work nights and weekends
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
From: United SFO B-737
Default

Superfluf asked if the JNC had passed on section 3 to the MECs. I believe I have read they did but the two MECs (apparently) did not agree with whatever they recommended.
Reply
Old 11-01-2010 | 01:41 PM
  #20  
757Driver's Avatar
Need More Callouts
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,143
Likes: 0
From: Unbridled Enthusiasm
Default

I'm all for the 747's being paid the highest as long as there aren't any fences around them.

What that letter doesn't address is that the UAL MEC passed a resolution mandating that it pay the highest, not the other way around. As far as I know the joint NC came up with an agreed upon section 3 and the UAL MEC shot it down, not CAL's.

Facts are a tricky thing as my buddy Coto likes to point out.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
HSLD
Major
25
12-28-2009 06:52 AM
iarapilot
Cargo
7
04-07-2009 02:31 PM
Freighter Captain
Atlas/Polar
0
09-24-2005 08:50 PM
WatchThis!
Major
0
06-16-2005 11:07 PM
WatchThis!
Major
0
05-19-2005 03:22 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices