Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
What to do about Contract Violation >

What to do about Contract Violation

Search

Notices

What to do about Contract Violation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-08-2010 | 01:38 PM
  #61  
250 or point 65's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 999
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by bender
GB

Who knew that the tried and true method of going to a regional and then a major would be kosher prior to 2003 and scabby after! Man I'm getting dizzy trying to think with your logic!
Agreed...plus I don't even fly for Skywest.

I'm just ANOTHER pilot hosed by scope relaxation and age 65. I am excited but not all that optimistic about ALPA's desire to bring all flying in-house.
Reply
Old 11-08-2010 | 04:38 PM
  #62  
Captain Bligh's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 791
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by gettinbumped
Wait! I'm 6'5" and sometimes fly out of IAH too! And soon we'll be wearing the same uniform!
Great! maybe the two of you can share clothes some weekend...
Reply
Old 11-08-2010 | 05:34 PM
  #63  
SONORA PASS's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
From: Left - Dodge Caravan
Default

Originally Posted by bender
GB

Who knew that the tried and true method of going to a regional and then a major would be kosher prior to 2003 and scabby after! Man I'm getting dizzy trying to think with your logic!
UAL gave it away! Nobody took it from us.

50 or 70 seats made no difference with exception to a few grandfathered 146's.

A decade after contract 2000 we have pilots hired during that time going from mainline to express as new hires.

It is my sincere hope that the pilots of UAL and CAL together will draw the line on outsourcing any jet aircraft as the number one contract demand.

SP
Reply
Old 11-08-2010 | 06:01 PM
  #64  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 929
Likes: 0
From: e190
Default

The pilots at skywest are NOT the problem. Management is the problem. While we are bickering over who took our job or how much they get paid the next scumbag move from management is already in motion.

I understand the knee jerk reaction of anger towards skywest but this is exactly what management wants. They want you to have your jumpseat war and to protest and pout. It detracts from our image as professionals and makes us look childish. They can then use this against us in court as an "illegal job action" or as ammunition in arbitration. It is a battle that will be fought and won in a court or at a negotiating table. A jumpseat battle is a mere inconvenience in the grand scheme of things. Who is more at fault the jumpseater or the scumbag in first class on a PS0B pass?

The best way to fight this is to stop negotiating in public, start pushing ALPA to make a safety issue out of regionals, and fly S.A.F.E. (slow and F expensive) until your court date.
Reply
Old 11-08-2010 | 06:20 PM
  #65  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 378
Likes: 0
From: Skeptical
Default

The interesting thing is that the pilots who might end up based out of IAH might just be UAL furloughs hired at SKYW via an agreement with UAL's ALPA: The last two classes hired (the first in over two years) were almost all UAL furloughs.

Kind of makes your head spin.
Reply
Old 11-08-2010 | 06:49 PM
  #66  
Rocketiii's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Default

The way I see this going down is the company backs down then tries to play scope vs jcba compensation. We (cal) had scope that was never challenged until this merger debacle. Now the merger goes through and our livelihoods are immediately attacked. The company is looking to attack something that they can trade. But we are not trading. We HAVE scope. We do not need to negotiate or trade for it. I hope the ual guys who do not have 70 seat protection will not take the 10 percent raise (20 or 30) and keep their current scope at the peril of losing the 50 seat protection cal has now. I see this as the play management is making. Just convince 51% that a pay raise is sufficient as they already have the 70 seaters. It's easy to accept the lack of scope in a new contract when you are on property and you don't have it anyway. Hopefully that doesn't happen on either side.
Reply
Old 11-08-2010 | 06:51 PM
  #67  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From: 777 FO
Default

Just got the letter from the MEC. November 29th SkyWest CRJ class with 20 slots. Looks like IAH will be staffed with furloughed UA pilots, just like it was when they opened an EMB base there in 2003 (for 2 years).
Reply
Old 11-08-2010 | 07:26 PM
  #68  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
From: emb-145 ca
Default

Originally Posted by Rocketiii
The way I see this going down is the company backs down then tries to play scope vs jcba compensation. We (cal) had scope that was never challenged until this merger debacle. Now the merger goes through and our livelihoods are immediately attacked. The company is looking to attack something that they can trade. But we are not trading. We HAVE scope. We do not need to negotiate or trade for it. I hope the ual guys who do not have 70 seat protection will not take the 10 percent raise (20 or 30) and keep their current scope at the peril of losing the 50 seat protection cal has now. I see this as the play management is making. Just convince 51% that a pay raise is sufficient as they already have the 70 seaters. It's easy to accept the lack of scope in a new contract when you are on property and you don't have it anyway. Hopefully that doesn't happen on either side.
This is spot on. For the most part, I think he is an idiot, but there was an eye-opening report published a few months ago by Boyd, the guy who projects the direction of the airline business landscape. If you read his stuff, he makes a very good case that it is going to become far more expensive for majors to run things under the current Major/Regional system because the cost savings are nowhere near as much as they were for the past 20 years. For example, from the perspective of a SCUMBAG AIRLINE MANAGER, would it be cheaper to pay regional carriers who have a growing cancer of 10-15 year employees or to bring those routes back to mainline, re-hire the now unemployed regional pilots as new hires, and have them fly the same routes they were flying before but with a big pay cut and 2-3 weeks less vacation than they have now?

So, SCUMBAG MANAGEMENT is pulling this ruse to get everyone to believe they really want to continue the current set-up as is. What really is going on is the SCUMBAG MANAGEMENT is looking for a lesser JCBA in order to "surrender" something to mainline pilots that they already intend to surrender anyway. They want every mainline pilot to pay a price to head the industry in a direction that they (SCUMBAG MANAGEMENT) already know makes sense for industry to head.

Almost makes your head spin what a mind-**** this actually is.

Last edited by CaptainNameless; 11-08-2010 at 08:17 PM.
Reply
Old 11-08-2010 | 08:29 PM
  #69  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
From: UAL 2172/ 1437
Default

We both serve the same master, and he is a lunatic and ungrateful!
Reply
Old 11-08-2010 | 09:36 PM
  #70  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 943
Likes: 0
From: 747 Captain, retired
Default

Originally Posted by newarkblows
The pilots at skywest are NOT the problem. Management is the problem. While we are bickering over who took our job or how much they get paid the next scumbag move from management is already in motion.

I understand the knee jerk reaction of anger towards skywest but this is exactly what management wants. They want you to have your jumpseat war and to protest and pout. It detracts from our image as professionals and makes us look childish. They can then use this against us in court as an "illegal job action" or as ammunition in arbitration. It is a battle that will be fought and won in a court or at a negotiating table. A jumpseat battle is a mere inconvenience in the grand scheme of things. Who is more at fault the jumpseater or the scumbag in first class on a PS0B pass?

The best way to fight this is to stop negotiating in public, start pushing ALPA to make a safety issue out of regionals, and fly S.A.F.E. (slow and F expensive) until your court date.
I don't get some of these posts from CAL pilots saying they will deny their jumpseats to Skywest Pilots who fly out of IAH.
I can remember a time when I was sitting side-saddle on a tri-motor when Captains at UAL refused to allow CAL pilots their jumpseats because they were all "scabs". This was after Lorenzo's carnage was over and several CAL pilots, who had NOT crossed a picket line, were being recalled. You can't punish the pilots for acts of their management al la Frank Lorenzo. My jumpseat is open to any pilot from any approved CASS airline trying to go to or from work...Anytime. Really guys; denying a jumpseat for these SkyWest Pilots is like punishing a child for the acts of their parents.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vagabond
Aviation Law
4
09-04-2008 12:09 PM
VictorFoxCharli
Foreign
13
07-18-2008 08:43 AM
BoredwLife
Major
1
07-16-2008 01:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices