You sir, are incorrect. What you're apparently lacking is the context for the aforementioned comment. The intent was to intimate to the masses that whilst "he" (read dexim) my be of a certain opinion, he represents a rapidly growing minority of those within the L-UAL camp. I, like many others imho, intend not to dwell/anchor in the thrash that has occurred as of late amongst our collective "pilot group". While the lessons learned shouldn't be lost going forward, neither should they be the focus of our "collective" attention. Therefore I felt the best methodology to surmise and convey my thoughts/feelings regarding this issue was to simply state "got-it" (translated = message received and understood, but less wordy and stuff). At that point the stage is set to discontinue engaging in discussion regarding related subject matter, no further discussion expected or required.

Your assumption that dexim is "under skin" is a clear miss, this is incorrect. However the resolution to nullify the offender - "Operation ignore" should be fully and completely adopted and implemented, without delay...I concur.

Let the games begin.

Cheers,
Horhay

 

+1 !!!!!!!!!!!

 

+1.........

 

No, I'm not joking. Just what purpose does it serve to beat it to death on this message board?

 

Not beating it to death - Just trying to keep it alive. We can't afford to have it happen again and there is no indication from either MEC that it won't.

 

This character, what's he call himself, Dexim?
Obviously a management plant trying to stir up some angst.
Let's move along, shall we?

 

All you're doing is feeding the beast...copy, ignore and we're all better off

 

Ignore who??

 

As I remember it - Dexim had nothing to do with it. CAL MEC and membership were responsible. Explain how Dexim is responsible and how/why he should be held accountable.

 

The primary reason to hold you accountable: You refer to yourself in the 3rd person, kind of weird.