A Problem With 5% Profit Sharing
01-30-2012, 06:14 PM
#51
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: A320 Cap
Posts: 2,282
Originally Posted by beeker
You seem to be confused. They are your 70 seaters. You just chose to out source them to the general practitioners because the brain surgeons thought they were too small.
01-30-2012, 06:15 PM
#52
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: 73 CA EWR
Posts: 514
Originally Posted by dexim
Did that and what did you do? Go to sleep!
Monkey Smells His Ass - YouTube
01-31-2012, 03:57 AM
#54
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Position: 787 Captain
Posts: 1,512
Originally Posted by Regularguy
Dexim:
I'm a UAL pilot but and I want you to know you are losing all of us with your continued harping about the PS and JP. What's done is done and I, like many others, have spent my PS so let's just rejoice that the LCAL guys and gals got theirs.
Now as far as those who keep poking at scope. As far as I know the two Jays are well aware of the issues and I expect that any contract handed to us for ratification will include an acceptable scope clause. If it isn't vote no.
Finally:
I don't see either side having any advantage over the other. The only difficulty is the seniority. LCAL has relatively many more "less senior" pilots flying Capt and WB FOs and it is the way it is. There will be pain in the integration no two ways about it or around it.
What I am really glad bout is the uniform will be blue. Why? It doesn't show cat and dog hairs as easily as black.
I'm a UAL pilot but and I want you to know you are losing all of us with your continued harping about the PS and JP. What's done is done and I, like many others, have spent my PS so let's just rejoice that the LCAL guys and gals got theirs.
Now as far as those who keep poking at scope. As far as I know the two Jays are well aware of the issues and I expect that any contract handed to us for ratification will include an acceptable scope clause. If it isn't vote no.
Finally:
I don't see either side having any advantage over the other. The only difficulty is the seniority. LCAL has relatively many more "less senior" pilots flying Capt and WB FOs and it is the way it is. There will be pain in the integration no two ways about it or around it.
What I am really glad bout is the uniform will be blue. Why? It doesn't show cat and dog hairs as easily as black.
Gee, let me guess... Is your seniority # <3000?
01-31-2012, 04:22 AM
#55
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Position: A Nobody
Posts: 1,559
F16:
"Gee, let me guess... Is your seniority # <3000?"
No "you chose poorly"
My seniority is very high at LUAL and I probably will be effected very little by any SLI agreement, unless the LUAL is stapled at the bottom (as one LCAL Captain suggested to me).
"Gee, let me guess... Is your seniority # <3000?"
No "you chose poorly"
My seniority is very high at LUAL and I probably will be effected very little by any SLI agreement, unless the LUAL is stapled at the bottom (as one LCAL Captain suggested to me).
01-31-2012, 05:56 AM
#56
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 163
Originally Posted by uaav8r
Well Otto, it sucks. Your scope is the envy of the piloting profession, alright? With any luck, OUR airline will have 100 seat jets for you and I to fly. No, I will not "pull your gear".
We all need toss our myopic ALPA influenced vision of what this profession and a well run company can pay.
01-31-2012, 06:14 AM
#57
Line Holder
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: Unqalified
Posts: 93
Originally Posted by EWR73FO
You've already subjugated 1437 and you aren't going to be happy until to add another 4800 to that list. Your arrogance is astounding. It's either bend to your will or suffer. This isn't a merger for you. It's personal. You want nothing more than to inflict the same pain, suffering, and general discontent you've had for the last 10+ years and you aren't going to stop until we are all just as miserable and pathetic as you are. This isn't about JP or PS or the CAL pilot group. You are just ****ed at the world and want to bring us all down with you. I actually feel sorry for you.
01-31-2012, 06:47 AM
#58
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: 737 Captain
Posts: 857
Originally Posted by davessn763
Incorrect, SWA's scope is the envy of the piloting profession, just like their pay for flying a 737-500 for more than Delta pays for flying a 747-400.
We all need toss our myopic ALPA influenced vision of what this profession and a well run company can pay.
We all need toss our myopic ALPA influenced vision of what this profession and a well run company can pay.
and mesa sux.
01-31-2012, 06:40 PM
#60
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 239
Originally Posted by Regularguy
F16:
"Gee, let me guess... Is your seniority # <3000?"
No "you chose poorly"
My seniority is very high at LUAL and I probably will be effected very little by any SLI agreement, unless the LUAL is stapled at the bottom (as one LCAL Captain suggested to me).
"Gee, let me guess... Is your seniority # <3000?"
No "you chose poorly"
My seniority is very high at LUAL and I probably will be effected very little by any SLI agreement, unless the LUAL is stapled at the bottom (as one LCAL Captain suggested to me).
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
